Preview

Arizona vs Grant Case

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1824 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arizona vs Grant Case
On August 25, 1999, acting on an anonymous tip that the residence at 2524 North Walnut Avenue was being used to sell drugs Tucson police officers Griffith and Reed knocked on the front door and asked to speak to the owner. Gant answered the door and, after identifying himself stated that he expected the owner to return later. The officers left the residence and conducted a records check, which revealed that Gant’s driver’s license had been suspended and there was an outstanding warrant for his arrest for driving with a suspended license. When the officers returned to the house that evening they found a man near the back of the house and a woman in a car parked in front of it. After a third officer arrived they arrested the man for providing a false name and the woman for possessing drug paraphernalia. Both arrestees were handcuffed and secured in separate patrol cars when Gant arrived. The officers recognized his car as it entered the driveway and Officer Griffith confirmed that Gant was the driver by shining a flashlight into the car as it drove by him. Gant parked at the end of the driveway got out of his car and shut the door. Griffith who was about 30 feet away called to Gant, and they approached each other meeting 10 to 12 feet from Gant’s car. Griffith immediately arrested Gant and handcuffed him. Because the other arrestees were secured in the only patrol cars at the scene Griffith called for backup. When two more officers arrived they locked Gant in the backseat of their vehicle. After Gant had been handcuffed and placed in the back of a patrol car two officers searched his car One of them found a gun and the other discovered a bag of cocaine in the pocket of a jacket on the backseat. Gant was charged with two offenses possession of a narcotic drug for sale and possession of drug paraphernalia the plastic bag in which the cocaine was found He moved to suppress the evidence seized from his car on the ground that the warrantless search violated


References: ^ "Law professor Tomkovicz writes brief for case in upcoming Supreme Court term". The Press-Citizen. 2008-09-29. http://www.google.com http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._Gant

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A confidential informant entered a suspected drug dealer’s apartment in order to purchase crack cocaine. Once the transaction was completed, the confidential informant signaled an undercover officer who then radioed uniformed police to the suspect’s apartment. Once officers responded to the scene, they approached the door of the apartment and encountered a strong odor of burning marijuana. Officers then announced their presence while knocking on the apartment door. Once the announcement of “police” was made, the officers then heard shuffling noises inside of the apartment that were consistent with the sound of evidence being destroyed. Officers then announced their intent to enter the apartment and then kicked in the door. Once inside the apartment, the officers found drugs and drug paraphernalia in plain view. Inside of the apartment, officers apprehended the respondent, King, and others, who were in possession of drugs.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The apprehended suspect was subsequently charged with crimes including but not limited to, Obstructing a Police Officer, PRCS Violation (felony, No-Bail Warrant), Possession of a Controlled Substance (Felony Warrant) and a DUI (felony arrest warrant).…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kyllo Case Study

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page

    The defendant, Kyllo, was arrested for growing marijuana in his home. In order to discover this, the police scanned Kyllo’s house utilizing a device that detects the heat from high intensity lams used to grow the plants inside close environments. The officer was standing on the street, outside of Kyllo’s house, as the scan revealed a part of the house that was significantly hotter than the rest. This information was used by the police to obtain a warrant to search the defendants home where they found more than 100 marijuana plants.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A person was wanted for questioning about a recent bombing; this person was hiding in a two-family dwelling. Mapp, the owner on the top floor, refused to let the officers come in without a search warrant. After Mapp refused to immediately let the officers in they broke the door’s glass open and then unlocked and opened the door from the outside. Mapp’s attorney showed up, but the officers wouldn’t let him see his client or go inside the house. Mapp demanded the search warrant. The officer help up a paper claiming to be the warrant and Mapp put the apper in her bosom. Then the officer struggled to retrieve the paper, which he eventually recovered. Mapp was handcuffed for resisting the officer. The officer searched the entire house but all that was recovered was “lwed and lascivious book and pictures”. She was then convicted for having them in her possession.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arizona v. Gant (2009) SCOTUS rule held that the Belton rule was revised as the justices stated that it did not give authority for the police officers to search an arrestee’s vehicle if the occupant had been arrested and therefore could not access the interior of the car. This implies that the police should only search the arrestee and places that could be reached. Gant could no longer reach the interior of his car, and there was no reasonable ground to suppose that a search would produce evidence to support the offense of driving on a suspended license. Gant v. Arizona established that a search of a vehicle after an arrest is permissible when the arrestee is not confined, and the passenger compartment is within their immediate reach.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Kentucky grand jury charged King with trafficking marijuana and trafficking of a controlled substance. King filed motion to suppress the evidence found in the warrantless search, but the trial court denied the motion. King entered a conditionally guilty plea, under which he reserved the right to appeal the denial of his suppression motion. The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision, saying that “exigent circumstances justified the warrantless entry because the…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chris Finish is a licensed driver who has owned his car for about six months. On the night of his arrest, he picked up Josh Kings at approximately 8:00 p.m. While double parked outside a store 24 police notice an expired inspection sticker on the defendants vehicle. the officer stopped them at approximately 10:30 p.m. After questions them for a bit the officer notices a handgun under the passenger seat. Both men denied any knowledge of the gun. The defendants lawyer moved for a directed verdict, The motion was denied, Chris is now appealing his conviction. John Kings has not been seen sense the night of the arrest.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two police officers, while cruising near noon in a patrol car, observed appellant and another man walking away from one another in an alley in an area with a high incidence of drug traffic. They stopped and asked appellant to identify himself and explain what he was doing.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On 10-09-16 at 2112 hours, Officer Harrell #3441 and I (3A21) were working uniformed patrol driving a marked black and white police vehicle. On the same date and time we were dispatched to a shooting investigation which occurred in front of 101 W. Washington Boulevard. Dispatch advised that an anonymous…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dlk Case Study

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federal agents suspected DLK was growing marijuana in his home and scanned DLK’s home from outside with a thermal imager which is a device that detects warmth within the home. The results were consistent with the use of heat intensive lights used in growing marijuana indoors and based on the scan and other evidence, the agents were able to obtain a warrant which was used to search the home where they found more than 100 marijuana plants. Within the search and seizure case of DLK, the government did not go too far because they had suspicion, did not invade the privacy of the suspect, and there was danger of loss of evidence.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On 10-12-17 at approximately 1749 hours, I saw Sutton standing on the west sidewalk on Raymond Avenue north of Del Mar Boulevard. I recognized Sutton from prior police contacts. I conducted a records check on Sutton via my patrol unit's computer, which revealed an outstanding arrest warrant. I contacted and arrested Sutton for the warrant. The handcuffs were double locked. I then transported Sutton to the Pasadena City Jail for booking.…

    • 71 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On November 12, 1984, Dethorne Graham was starting to recognize the onset of a diabetic reaction. He knew what he needed and he asked one of his friends to drive him to the nearest convenience store. Graham walked away from the car towards the convenience store without noticing the police officer, Connor, that was sitting across the road. Although once Graham got in the store and realized how many people were in the store he quickly walked out thinking it would be faster to go somewhere else. Connor then saw this happen and decided to follow them and pulled them over a little ways down the road. The driver, William Berry tried to tell Connor that Graham was a diabetic but Connor did not want to listen. Graham got out of the car and passed out on the curb. An officer that had arrived on the scene, rolled Graham over and handcuffed him. Four officers then picked him off of the ground and slammed him on the hood of Berry’s car. Graham had tried to tell the officers to get his wallet where he had a card labeling him as a diabetic. One officer told him to “Shut up!” and slammed his head on the car again. Officer Connor then got word that Graham had not done anything wrong at the store. The officers took him home and released him but not before…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On October 18th and 22nd of the year 1990, a Syracuse police officer was working undercover for the DEA and confidential informant Luther Gregory made purchases of cocaine from Morales. While the transaction was going down, Parke was outside the facility conducting surveillance. On October 30, 1990, Wallie Howard (the Syracuse police officer) was shot and killed during a cocaine “buy-bust.” Morales, Stewart, and Lawrence are tried and found guilty in a court of law. They attempted to appeal the conviction based on the defense of self-defense. They were denied but still able to be acquitted.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Riverside police detective Kevin Townsend decided to conduct a probation search on George Roussell’s home. The detective was having a very time trying to figure out where the Roussell lived. The probation agency said that Roussell lived in Moreno Valley, but the court system said that he lived in Corona. Roussells DMV address was on a Gould street in Riverside, but all his recent information like the local utilities and phone company showed that he was living at 8123 Magnolia Avn. Apt. 85 in Riverside. Detective Townsend made the decision that the Magnolia apartments had to be his current residents because of the utility bills. He also believed that was his home because most probationers and parolees give false addresses so that they can avoid warren less arrest. Most probationers and parolees don’t know that the police have access to there utility bills. Police use there utility bills so that they can track the criminals down and find out where they live.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Essay

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the Crown sated the facts, the Accused was arrested in September 13, 2011 for distribution of narcotics and prohibited firearms position. The offender was released on conditional sentence due to the judge was satisfied that the offender did not pose danger to the community. The offender has been on house arrest until the date of his trail and he breached his condition five times. On March 2nd, 2013 the accused was having an argument at home with his family and he decided to leave the house for a walk to cool down and the police spot him and ran his name through…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays