Preview

Aristotle's Argument Essay: To Be A Good Man

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
542 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle's Argument Essay: To Be A Good Man
Book III is worried about the idea of various constitutions, however keeping in mind the end goal is to comprehend urban areas and the constitutions on which they are established. Aristotle starts with an exploration into the idea of citizenship. Aristotle points out that even though citizenship is often reserved for those who are born to already citizen parents, this inherited status becomes insignificant in times of revolution or change within society. To Aristotle this raises concern about who is justly granted citizenship and to those that it is denied. Aristotle next thinks about the criteria for being a decent citizen and those for being a decent man. Even though they might sound similar they are two different scenarios. To be a good citizen is to be one that upholds and honors the constitution. However when it comes to being a good man, it is possible to be a good citizen without being a good man. This entitlement of being a bad man is held upon the moral aspects one may have as a reflection of ones religion or …show more content…
Democrats and oligarchs both base their claim to manage mixed up perspective of justice. Oligarchs trust that in light of the fact that the poor are unequal in riches, they are additionally substandard all in all. Democrats, then again, feel that since all are similarly free, all are equivalent for the most part. Each of the administrations depends on a specific perspective of equity, and in that capacity they all mirror a fractional truth about political life. Justice implies giving equivalent measures to levels with and unequal measures to unequal. Aristotle understands that individuals are awful judges concerning themselves and that as in government and democracy they have a tendency to befuddle a piece of equity with the entire of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Do you find yourself shocked or frustrated right at the end of a good book? Do you end up scratching your head and wonder what just happened? That’s because good writers know how to persuade readers to think a certain way, like the most logic or obvious choice, and add a twist that will leave you saying, “I didn’t see that coming!” After going back and rereading you see hidden clues that lead up to the final conclusion. This is known as “breadcrumbs.” Great author’s love throwing breadcrumbs into their story to show that things aren’t exactly as they appear. One example of a great plot twist is “A Good Man is Hard to Find” by Flannery O’ Connor. When reading, you think it’s about a family vacation gone wrong. The story has many laugh-out-loud humor that we all can relate when it comes to vacations. Rotten little bother’s and sister’s, granny who gets what she wants, dad who is in charge, and mother who is just along for the ride. Then the ending happens. The story takes a dramatic turn from all the humor to…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several Greek city-states had the government form of an oligarchy, where the small group of people wield the ruling power. They were considered the highest class as political power was shared amongst the group (Carr). The groups were formed based off of aristocratic birth or wealth (Carr). Unlike this class, the lower class citizens in the oligarchy did not share the same rights as they lacked full political rights and were not eligible to rule (Carr). They are thus excluded from voting or having any type of say for any political decision for the city-state Furthermore, the right to vote or to be eligible for power was based off of wealth in this government form. In contrast to this government for his city-state lived under, Aristotle explores…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Moral Beliefs

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    My moral beliefs also correspond to the philosophy that is taught by Aristotle. In my opinion, happiness comes from within ourselves, not from our surroundings. I think this is a very important part of Aristotle’s teaching. I believe that in order to accept others and enjoy life, we must first learn to accept ourselves and be proud of who we are. If we are constantly ashamed with who we are, then we are not free to live a happy life. I think this is the main idea in Aristotle’s teaching. He believed that in order for us to be happy we must build our own character by choosing to live virtuously.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The tyrant, who is also the most unjust man, is the least happy, but the aristocrat, the most just man, is the most happy, which shows that it pays to be just. In turn, Socrates comes up with his own definition of justice where, just like the ideal society, the just man has to balance the rational part of his soul, the spirited part of his soul, and the appetitive part of his soul. The problem, though, is that with this definition, the hoi polloi of America is…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle Essay

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A relativist would react to “What makes you happy might be one thing, but what makes another person happy could be entirely different, so do not impose your lifestyle on other people” by agreeing with the statement about not inflicting your lifestyle on someone else. Relativists believe you cannot urge morality on others. Even if it is someone who you share a primary relationship with, you can not make any judgement on what decisions they make. Relativists do not judge others, so if something very immoral makes you happy, a relativist can not impose on your choice of being immoral. Relativism says that all culture is good and all culture is bad; it’s the same thing as happiness, it can be good or bad but you can not judge a persons happiness whether it is good or bad. Overall, a relativist would never impose on someone’s lifestyle even if something totally different makes them happy, or even if what makes one happy is completely wrong and immoral.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A Good Man is Hard to Find,” by Flannery O’Connor, is a detailed account of a family trip to Florida that ends in tragedy. On this journey, the family meets several different characters along the way. No matter how insignificant each character is O’Connor is sure to give the reader a full understanding of their intentions and personality. Although the reader never gets to know some of the characters names, O’Connor is sure to make the reader feel as though he knows each character personally. O’Connor uses characterization techniques such as actions, clothing and family life that allow the reader to…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s argument in virtue ethics is based on an appeal to the notion of an objective account of “the good” for human beings and happiness. “The good” is so important that every good soul takes it as the end. On the other hand, it is also so hard to grasp what are “the good”, so that people seem to be able to intuitively feel it exists but cannot establish a solid belief in it. If one does not know what are “good”, then naturally they will not be able to identify other things that have goodness.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle truly believed that politics was a science that could be understood in the same way as anatomy or physics. Because of that he wrote this book to help people create a better more stable state. He starts by explaining the way in which a household is like a small state and clarifying the rules that must be put into place in regards to women, children and slaves all of which he seen as less than people with purpose. After dealing with this he begins his description of the different types of states, which he divides into six main primary forms. The first three that he would describe as proper states are monarchy, aristocracy and constitutional government. After that he describes the three corrupted forms as tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy. Monarchy is when one person who is the best in the state rules under the law for the sake of his citizens. This government though is often corrupted into tyranny where one person through strength holds his equals or betters below himself for his own benefit. Aristocracy is when the people who are above average join together to wisely run the state so that it might prosper. Often though it degrades into oligarchy where the power is all in the hands of a few who use the power to try maintain their position. Constitutional government is when people willingly submit to wise laws, which are put together to help the state. Democracy is its corrupted form…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of Aristotle’s most prominent teachings in “Politics,” is the interpretation of the state of nature. “It is evident that the state is a creation of nature, and that man is by nature a political animal.” (I. 2. 153a.) From this statement, it is clear that human beings are innately political, regardless of the setting they are in. One example he gives to support his argument is that the hand of a body is similar to an individual of a city. This analogy demonstrates the relation of one functioning part that is attached to the whole and complete functioning system. A functional hand is only used when the entire body is operating correctly. Similarly, the city is comprised of multiple individuals each with specific duties to create a collection of different parts with different functions, all working simultaneously together for the city. The goal is to pursue the common good of the city, even when it conflicts with one’s self-interest. The common good gives people the opportunity to reach the highest form of virtue and requires the whole community. Another example…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    557a To 561e Analysis

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Book VIII, following the description of a just city, i.e. an Aristocracy, in Book VII, explains the birth and structure of the four kinds of unjustified constitutions and the degeneration through them. In order of the least to the most unjust (and therefore in order of “degeneration”), these constitutions are Timocracy, Oligarchy, Democracy and Tyranny. Alongside these, Book VIII describes the corresponding man who would live in each city. The individuals in the latter cities are considered less “just” as their actions are less for the good of the city and more to "gratify… the desire of the moment" as in democracy. This is related to the structure in their education as it becomes less planned and so they are less capable of performing the role they eventually choose, compared to how skilled they would have been if they had been educated for that role their entire lives, as in Plato’s supreme…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democratic egalitarianism is one subject that may be a bit more complex to dissect and justify than the others. It reserves the goal of the justice of the distribution of economic goods and burdens to ascertain and secure the essential social relations entailed by connection in a democratic public. It also pertains to hierarchical and oppressive matters. Although democratic egalitarianism relates to equality, some who believe in the practice turn natural arbitrary aspects into disadvantages that may cripple others. This naturally generates into the lowers of the totem pole to have very little say in any instances of decision making.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many ways, the way political economists, and by extension, many of the rest of us, think about economic inequality today is influenced by what Aristotle wrote about economic inequality almost two and half millenia ago. In and of itself, this is somewhat remarkable. But more importantly, Aristotle’s idea that the problem with economic inequality is that the poor, if they gain power, will soak the rich remains both pervasive and persuasive. On this reading of Aristotle, economic inequality is ‘bad’ because it provides an incentive for the poor to upset the equilibrium of a political community. While this line of thought can certainly be found in the Politics, in the next section I argue that it represents only a part of Aristotle’s thinking.22…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has been argued that morality or virtue are constitutive of self-interest or, as one could put it, ‘its own reward’. By being moral we are benefitted in one way or another, whether that be due to happiness or the result that the action of morality leads to, such as some form of recognition, which in turn usually leads to happiness.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    GOVT 141

    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages

    b.i.2. Aristotle: constitution from various city-state, outlined the constitution of other cities, describe and define different city-state.…

    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle and Plato have debated about the Rule of Law. Barker writes about Aristotle's viewpoint and how being ruled by a constitution & rotation of office provides everyone with the same rights and worth, rather than being ruled by a king judging in accordance with his/her own feelings & thereby, not having a 'neutral' mind when exercising authority.…

    • 2454 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays