Preview

Aristotle Theory of Justice Applied to Modern Society.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1109 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle Theory of Justice Applied to Modern Society.
ARISTOTLE THEORY OF JUSTICE APPLIED TO MODERN SOCIETY.

The problem about justice has been found present throughout history, in this way, Aristotle himself and tried to define it, dividing it into the so-called Private Law, or law of the polis, and the Common Law, that which is present in nature. The main doctrines define justice, as the set of rules and regulations that can regulate conduct between individuals, on the permissiveness avalación, prohibition and restriction of certain behaviors or actions on human actions or institutions, however, is from the science of law, which is quite complex to achieve a single definition on this concept, since it depends on many factors and in addition, there are as many definitions as authors, because justice is due to a particular context, where there are experiences, circumstances and situations quite different.

In the fifth book of the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle presents the single most necessary of all for the conservation of the world, which is the virtue of justice, without which neither the things of war, nor the great treasures acquired, nor live with great care, neither do long mercedes, saving enough to preserve the Republic. Which is readily discernible in the historical context of different civilizations such as Roman, who despite being the greatest monarch the world has seen, since the justice between them began to darkening, he hit big fall that killed the everything. (Aristotle, s.f: 126).

Despite the historical difference of the Aristotelian theory of justice in contemporary society, may suggest prospects for addressing the problem of the establishment of a just civil order in Colombia. If we examine more generally the Judiciary in the country would argue that there is a lingering uncertainty on the part of citizens with respect to access, opportunity, adequate size, effectiveness and efficiency of justice. In this context, several aspects of the works of Aristotle that can be used to overcome great



References: • Aristotle. (S.f), Nicomachean Ethics. Book V, pages 126-158. • SERRANO, Enrique. (2005). Aristotelian theory of justice. Cervantes Virtual Library.Taken from the Web http://descargas.cervantesvirtual.com/servlet/SirveObras/12593391999142639643846/015150.pdf?incr=1. Retrieved on Monday, September 13, 2010.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper we will show that Glaucon and Thrasymachus' positions on justice are entirely different. We argue that Thrasymachus despite his slippage and confusion between a traditional and immoralist definition of justice, is really intending to illustrate a political system ruled by a rational-minded and exploitative tyrant. On the other hand Glaucon clearly presents justice as a necessary evil originating out of a social contract constructed by the weak of society. He then challenges Socrates to prove to him that the life of a just man is better than the life of an unjust man.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle once said, “It is in justice that the ordering of society is centered”. In our society there are theories of justice, which is Retribution, Utilitarianism and Restitution. These forms have similarities and differences and are use in many different social groups every day.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aquinas's political and legal theory is important for three reasons. First, it reasserts the value of politics by drawing on Aristotle to argue that politics and political life are morally positive activities that are in accordance with the intention of God for man. Second, it combines traditional hierarchical and feudal views of the structure of society and politics with emerging community-oriented and incipiently egalitarian views of the proper ordering of society. Third, it develops an integrated and logically coherent theory of natural law that continues to be an important source of legal, political, and moral norms.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his ``Rhetoric of Justice'', Aristotle differentiates between two kinds of law: the particular and the universal. The first, he says, is that which an individual community lays down for itself. The second, the universal law, is what Aristotle refers to as ``a natural and universal notion of right and wrong''. Lewis's novel portrays a community which have instituted the first type of law, but there is no adequate sense of community justice being precise and universally correct. Furthermore, Lewis highlights the nature of Artigues' oblivious justice system which innocently supposes man's law to be inextricable from God's will. Though the nature of the social and legal structure ensure the survival and prosperity of Artigues, to the detriment of…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is justice? Today, where it is common for people to only look out for themselves, justice is an extremely important tool. But what exactly is justice? What is right, what is wrong, and who decides that? To find an accurate definition, we as a society should not just focus on one opinion, but the views of many. Similar to how our society is today, the society in The Republic, lived the same, struggling to determine what the correct definition of justice was, and how to pursue the right answer. In the paper, I will be discussing all aspects of Plato’s Republic, including the Philosopher King and his nature, and justice in that time.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is justice is a question that has plagued philosophers since the time of Plato when he wrote The Republic to present day. In the book, Plato uses the dialectic, between Socrates and other Athenians like Polemarchus, Cephalus, and Glacuon, to try and find the definition of justice. Through the voice of Glaucon, Plato defines justice as a compromise of sorts between advantage and fear, and injustice as the things that we wouldn’t…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: "Aristotle 's Nicomachean Ethics." Ethics: History, Theory, and Contemporary Issues. Trans. W. D. Ross. New York: Oxford UP, 2012. 124-77. Print. Books I-BookX.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice is a concept that has changed and developed throughout history. The foundation of the modern justice system in the western world began in Athens just over two thousand years ago. Many philosophers had their own conceptions about what justice truly is, however, Plato proved to be the most influential. Before Plato, many men shared Polemarchus’ belief that justice meant giving good to friends and evil to enemies. In his book, The Republic, Plato sets out to define the true definition of justice. Plato states that justice is when men to put aside irrational desires for the greater good of society. If civilization were to follow Polemarchus’ view of justice, society would become anarchy. People would punish those that have wronged them…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will attempt to give a detailed breakdown of David Hume 's take on morality, and how some of the other philosophers would critique his stance. I will first speak about why Hume believes reason and passion don 't contradict each other. Then I will give Aristotle’s and Aquinas ' view on this conclusion of his. Next, I will speak on how Hume argues that moral judgments aren 't grounded in reason. Afterwards, I will discuss what he considers that moral judgments are founded on. Finally, I will give a critique of Hume 's theory from Hobbes ' perspective.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    | Aristotle claims, relates to lawfulness. Judges exercise corrective justice when they punish criminals, award damages……

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory of Justice

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Within this essay, the Theory of Justice will be broke down. It will lay out some personal information on John Rawls. It will give the principles of the theory and explain what they mean. It will also explain how the principles of these theories differ from traditional utilitarianism. Lastly it will show how justice is defined by modern criminal justice agencies and other entities involved in the criminal justice system and how it differs from security.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory of Justice

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The theory of justice is a work of political philosophy and ethics by John Rawls. According to Gomez, philosopher John Rawls who lived between 1921- 2002, argued the notion of social justice as fairness in his book "A Theory of Justice." He used foundations of utilitarian and Kantian philosophy to create a possible technique to estimate the ethics of social and political institutions. The principles of justice theories was Rawls 's theory and it is dependent on two important and central principles of social justice that, according to Rawls, assures a just and morally acceptable society. The first principle of social justice states “every person has a right to the most basic liberties, same as any other person who has a right to the same liberties.” The second principle of social justice states “all people should have access to the same social and economic positions and be able to take advantage of them”.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due process perspective, believe that the justice system should be dedicated to providing fair and equitable treatment to those accused of crime. This means providing impartial hearings, competent legal counsel, evenhanded treatment, and reasonable sanctions to ensure that no one suffers from racial, religious, or ethnic discrimination and that their basic constitutional rights are respected…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Aristotle, arguably the most important philosophers of their time, both made attempts to define justice. Being that Aristotle was a student of Plato, their ideas share many similarities. Both viewed justice as the harmonious interaction of people in a society. However, Plato defined his ideal of justice with more usage of metaphysics, invoking his Form of the Good, while Aristotle took a more practical approach, speaking in terms of money and balance. Although Aristotle's ideal of justice may seem superior, upon further inspection, Plato's ideal of justice is the stronger.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American criminal court system plays a major role in our country. Without this system, all of those who violate the law would be entitled to do whatever they want and not held accountable for their actions. Defining the court and its purpose it’s something that will makes us understand the system a little better. The dual court system, also plays a major role in our countries system and will be defined in this paper. Describing the role that early legal codes, the common law, and precedent played in the development of courts will also be defined in depth…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics