Preview

Aristotle's Critique of Plato

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
470 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle's Critique of Plato
Aristotle's Critique of Plato Aristotle took a distinct path verging from the foundation of Plato's philosophy. In order to control society Plato used the noble lie, so people under the state wouldn't question their place in life. Aristotle, on the other hand, used the idea of "civic virtue of friendship" to create a sense of community. "For Aristotle, friendship is a virtue "most necessary for our life." Without friendship, life would be missing a major dimension and in consequence our live would lack real significance." (50) As this quote entails, friendship is important to Aristotle and is a major foundation for his philosophy. Plato's noble lie was a way to patch the giant hole in his theory of an ideal society, and Aristotle, to avoid the problems associated with ideal theories, has a state built on practical intelligence. "Aristotle starts from existing ways of life and finds the bases for a rational order to life contained in the ongoing practices of society." (48) In Plato's theory he is looking for a way to create just people and an orderly society. The polis' well being is more important than the individual. Not to say that Aristotle cared for individual rights, but he viewed the polis as a means to the "good life." The polis is justified then by the peoples desire to achieve happiness. Aristotle and Plato have differing opinion on who should lead the polis. Plato felt "philosopher kings" should rule because they would be trained and have the most knowledge and wisdom to know justice from injustice, and Plato strictly disagrees with democracy saying that it only leads to tyranny. Aristotle was in favor of a Polity which has the middle class rule since the middle class have the least desire to be rich or to have control; however, a Polity is unpractical because the middle class is usually not strong enough to counter the ambitions of the rich or the power crave of the poor, thus leaving either the rich or the poor in charge. Needing a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plato believes that the ideal ruler of the state should be a philosopher. He states that a king concerned with the pursuit of wisdom would undoubtedly be better than a lover of power, wealth or status. To have the majority vote for what is best would be irrelevant as they do not understand what is real and Philosophers are the only ones who can do this and fully understand the forms.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A teacher is talking about how he teaches his class, by naming the different types of literature they read throughout the school year. Then he says “I always have the option and the pleasure of asking a very smart group of students a revealing question: “What would Plato say?’” The author then starts talking about how ungrateful people are during his time. People are able to communicate with people all over the word and people can fly to places saving so much time just to get to their destination. Yet, people are unhappy and just complain about things. He then starts telling about how people hundreds of years ago would have loved to have a cell phone or be able to fly on a plane. After the author explains Plato’s believes, he also explains…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle a Greek philosopher born in Macedonia in 394 BC has different forms of viewing politics. He describes the polis, or city, as a koinonia, or political association, and he proclaims that all relations, like all thoughtful human acts, are shaped with the objective of accomplishing a particular good. He says that being part of a polis is the only way someone can be a part of a great life. Because politics are necessary for this Aristotle says, "Man is by nature a political animal."(Aristotle 90). As part of the books discussion of the economy a city-state needs, Aristotle defends the system of private property and argues against extreme capitalism and says that slavery is necessary in order for society to function and democracy as being…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Politics, Aristotle not only stresses the importance of law but also warns against the assignment of law as the absolute sovereign, since it could end up creating oligarchy or democracy, which in his respective interpretations are less virtuous forms of government. This is due to the facts that these unvirtuous regimes have the wrong political goals in mind. Oligarchy divides up people and devalue them based on wealth and as a result creates a wealth-based society, while democracy puts law at the risk of tyranny of the…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Plato, “Using the written word to give a distorted image of the nature of the gods and heroes, completely fails to capture the likeness of the original,” (Book II, p46). An author or poet cannot simply say whatever he or she likes, rather there needs to be truth in what they are writing. In order to understand why Plato takes this stand, it’s important to have an idea of the time in history he was in. At this time many of the strong leaders were apt on building strong intelligent soldiers who would be able to conquer other nations and empires. To fill the minds of the future generation with fantastical stories of hero’s and distraught God’s, in Plato’s mind, only served to weaken the minds of the people. Stories that filled the minds of people with fear, sadness, or excessive pleasure indulged a part of the mind that did not need to be indulged…“If the young men of our community hear this kind of thing and take it seriously, rather than regarding it as despicable and absurd, they’re hardly going to regard such behavior as despicable in human beings like themselves and feel remorse when they also find themselves saying or doing these or similar things,” (Book III, p54).…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    are right and wrong no matter the content of the act. It should be completely wrong to not treat everyone with respect based on who they are. Race, religion, sex and even medical diagnosis shouldn’t matter. Plato was an absolutist and he thought that as well as things being right and wrong, he thought that goodness itself really exists even after life itself. The highest form, the form of goodness had brought up the question of ‘What is goodness itself?”. Plato thought that goodness itself was the highest form of reality, which is an objective or absolute thing that existed eternally, beyond our limited world. He valued goodness very highly, comparing it to having the same importance that the sun has. We can look at this as having values and realizing that everything is important and good as well as all people. All people have a meaning to our society. We are all different because if we was all the same, we would be complaining of how bored we was. Plato thought that every moral situation was either right or wrong, and that our minds which were “distorted between pleasure and pain” could not perceive circumstances correctly, because we could not…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato insisted change was made up of only two things: a pair of opposite properties and a subject. He argued that change occurs when the subject loses one of the opposing properties in the pair but gains the other in the process. For example, going back to the young versus old analogy, Plato would say that change occurs when a young man (the subject) loses his youth (a property) and gains age (the opposite property). Aristotle revised Plato's theory, and instead insisted that change requires the three aforementioned things: a subject, a form, and a lack of that form.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Platonist

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristotle and Plato were two men with different theories. Although they had some aspects in common, each had their understandings and meanings. Here I will explain what were their beliefs and how these philosophers interpreted each word with its true value. Also with the information, I will try to undercover the meaning of why people used to say people were born either as a Platonist or as a Aristotelian.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato arugment

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Affirmative action is a deliberate effort to provide full and equal opportunities in employment, education, and other areas for women, minorities, and individuals belonging to other traditionally disadvantaged groups. As an issue of today's society,…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato States Decline Essay

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Plato would have seen the Athenian society, in his time, shifting from an Oligarchy to a Democracy. The love of money in the oligarchy leads to the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. The love of money and virtue of self-control cannot co-exist, so as the wealth becomes more concentrated, the wealthy lose their self-control. As the poor grow in numbers, the number of beggars and thieves increases. They hate and conspire against everyone who owns property and are eager for revolution.…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato divided society into three groups. Briefly describe each of these groups Your answer should be at least three full paragraphs (about five sentences each).…

    • 259 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The principle stated at 436c, that the same thing cannot do, be or undergo opposite things in the same respect, in relation to the same thing, at the same time is a basic premise in Plato’s argument. This principle supports the conclusion stated in 439c, that if we are thirsty and rejecting the drink at the same time, there is something in the soul urging us to drink and something different stopping us. At first, I am going to reconstruct the argument, then try to show how the argument works, and why this principle is so important. The argument is: P1 The same thing cannot do, be or undergo opposite things in the same respect, in relation to the same thing, at the same time.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato vs. Socrates

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Politics for these two resembles night and day. Aristotle preached balance. In balance, a stable government can be observed and obtained. Plato's concept of what politics and government should be is a direct result of his belief in the theory of forms. The theory of forms basically states that there is a higher "form" for everything that exists in the world.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Aristotle's Politics, he focuses much on the regimes of an oligarchy and of a democracy. Democracies exists when the free and poor, being a majority, have authority to rule, and have an equal share in the city. Oligarchies exists when the few wealthy and better born have authority and grant benefits in proportion to a person's wealth (1280a:10-30;1290a:5-10).…

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Plato

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two of the greatest and earliest thinkers of our time are Plato, and his most famous pupil, Aristotle. Soon after Plato’s teachings, Aristotle criticized his claims and independently became a thinker on his own. These philosophers viewed metaphysics differently, and they approached the idea of reality in two opposing ways. Plato’s Theory of Forms was a concept that was defined in a different way by Aristotle. They both believed in “forms” but approached this idea differently.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics