Preview

Arguments Against Trophy Hunting

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1575 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against Trophy Hunting
According to a Wall Street Journal article, Africa’s elephant population dropped more than 30% from 2007 to 2014 due to poaching and trophy hunting (Anderson). That means over 100,000 elephants were killed in seven short years. Trophy hunting is when hunters kill animals for money, bragging rights, and their own greed. This can cause drops in population or affect the ways animals survive. Even though it is major and causes so many problems, trophy hunting is looked past as if it is not an issue. Trophy hunting should be illegal because it depletes animal populations, reduces tourism, and is inhumane.
People who oppose this idea believe that hunting helps to raise the population of the species. Former Executive Director and President of the
…show more content…
It makes wildlife an asset to local communities, which secures survival of at-risk species” (Anderson). They say if hunting is done within reason, it shows how valuable the species is and can raise awareness to save them. However, this just makes it more likely for people to want to kill them for their own needs as they now know what it can be used for. For example, according to English Archbishop William Booth, elephant’s ivory can be worth over $200 a kilogram and is in high demand (Booth). Once hunters know this, they will only want to kill the elephants more. Another reason they support trophy hunting is because they think it is inevitable no matter what they do. Teacher and author Terry Hanmer writes, “Humans are not the only enemies animals have and all animals do not always get along” (Hanmer 53). Animals prey on each other more than humans hunt, so the humans believe that their hunting does not matter as much. While this may be true, hunting animals is not a natural process and it can affect their way of life by killing their leaders and ruining their environment. For instance, in a pack of wolves, killing the alpha wolf affects every wolf. In 77% of of cases studied, a pack dissolved because their leader was killed. When a pack …show more content…
In a recent poll 100 people were asked “Should trophy hunting and poaching of all animals be illegal?”. More than ¾ of those people responded with yes. Many said they thought it was cruel to kill animals and some were worried about the extinction of the species (Lundie). There is not a “humane” method of killing… many land animals face fatal injuries causing them to suffer for many days rather than killing them instantly (Gunn). Thinking it is more moral, many hunters only injure the animal to get what they want instead of killing them. That animal will have to learn to survive with any injury they face, but most will not survive. When an animal is injured, it is harder for them to take proper care of their children and make sure they are alive too, meaning they might die as well. Additionally, in a Wall Street Journal article, Terry L. Anderson asks the reader to “picture dozens of elephants with their tusks, ears, and feet dismembered… left to die” (Anderson). These elephants are torn apart for their body parts and are left to die. Elephants grieve very similarly to humans. They shed actual tears, hold funerals, and some have even died from the grief of family or friends dying. When an elephant in their herd dies, they surround it and sway together, crying. The deaths of these elephants affect the other elephants so much.Furthermore, as an expert informs, “Tusks are the elephant’s teeth — it extends into the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “Cecil the Lion Killed By American Dentist” was the headline that rekindled the controversial debate over trophy hunting. This debate is better represented by Goodwell Nzou’s article “In Zimbabwe We Don’t Cry For Lions” than in the passage by Alexis Crosswell “5 Reasons Why Trophy Hunting is Not Conservation.” Trophy hunting is the killing of animals specifically for the purpose of keeping a portion of the animal as a prize. Since the death of Cecil the Lion, the sport has come under significant fire from the media and sparked heated argument. Nzou has the stronger argument than Crosswell’s specifically because: it recognizes that humans personify deadly animals, the writer of “In Zimbabwe We Don’t Cry For Lions” has personal experience with the subject and that Goodwell Nzou explains that American priorities are more concerned with animals than starving people.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctoral student in molecular and cellular biosciences at Wake Forest University and member of the African Nzou clan, Goodwell Nzou, in his opinion contribution to the New York Times, effectively claims that trophy hunting is not as bad as Americans are making it out to be. First, he supports this claim by asserting that lions are considered killers in African villages. Nzou uses cause and effect to appeal to pathos when stating, “When I was 9 years old, a solitary lion prowled villages near my home. After it killed a few chickens, some goats and finally a cow, we were warned to walk to school in groups and stop playing outside. My sisters no longer went alone to the river to collect water or wash dishes; my mother waited for my father and older brothers, armed with machetes, axes and spears, to…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Why Sport Hunting Is Cruel and Unnecessary”. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA): The animal rights organization PETA.org. n.d. Web. 4 October 2012.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although each type of hunting involves the killing of animals; the two are different in many ways. The environmental impact and economic influence could be disturbing in both cases if certain measures fail to protect the animals from being harvested in large quantities through legal or illegal means. Poaching involves the illegal harvesting of animals for some type of personal or professional gain while trophy hunting tends to lean strictly on the side of personal gain for the thrill and adventure the individual hunter has during the hunt. Each category can entail monetary gain. The poacher may gain money through the illegal sale of his kill. The trophy hunter generally does not come out on the positive side when it comes to monetary gain since he or she must often pay a guide or hunting preserve for the opportunity to make the kill. Trophy hunting still provides an economic boost to the person or entity in charge of the…

    • 2298 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To do our part in keeping balance to the populations we’ve offset. As Kristof put it “it’s an abdication of environmental responsibility to eliminate other predators and then refuse to assume the job ourselves. In that case, the collisions with humans will simply get worse.” I also found myself in compliance with Kristof’s assumption that people these days would look at hunting more as a barbaric action rather than a necessary one for ecological balance. Looking at both sides of the opinion of hunting in today’s society the authors makes it clear that he doesn’t expect the idea to make sense to people who may hold an ignorant stance when challenged with his proposal. Kristof was sure to include this when talking about where people may stand on this topic in an everyday life setting “Granted, hunting isn’t advisable in suburban backyards, and I don’t expect many soccer moms to install gun racks in their minivans.” I believe his humorous tone while explaining his opinion of the need to kill animals in to achieve positive environmental results is appropriate in the way he expresses the logical irony of his claim. A Claim made strong by ending it with a real example of how this problem can literally come crashing into our homes of not dealt with in the right way, the way the Author deemed as a logical…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Africa is in the middle of a growing epidemic elephant slaughter. This growing slaughter began in 2002 and is currently happening till this day. Conservation groups share that elephant poachers are killing tens of thousands of elephants every year, which is more than at any time since the “Ivory Wars” has started. Recently in Garamba National park, Paul Onyango says that he has never seen anything like this before. 22 elephants were killed with a single shot to the head, including several young elephants as well. The reasons for the slaughtering is that poachers sell the animals tusks which have ivory in them.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How do you feel about lions? Do you want them to be extinct? If we continue this type of hunting, every lion that you have ever seen will be gone. Also, this includes tigers, elephants, rhinos, and many more. Big Game Trophy Hunting is a danger to the environment due to population. You might say “Hunting provides food for us,” or “This helps keep the populations under control.” All of this might be true, but populations would even rise more if we kept…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are lots of different people in the world that are against hunting and people that think hunting is wrong, but what they don’t realize is that hunting wild game serves many purposes. There are a lot of different reasons why there are hunters that hunt and shoot wild game. One reason why hunters hunt is to support their families by putting food on the table. Being able to control the wildlife population and decrease vehicle accidents and vegetation is another reason why hunting is a good thing. Another good reason to hunt is that there is a large amount of money to be made in the sport of hunting that goes right back into conservation. Hunting is a much needed sport in this world to help maintain and keep a stable good environment.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Many of the animals are so tame that people can walk right up to them. They have no chance.” States Lena Masr. These animals have been have been raised around people knowing nothing about getting shot, so when they actually trust someone the trust gets taken away along with the animals lives. If exotic hunting were to be a thing it should at least be in Africa where the animals can run and attempt to get away from killed and/ or harmed. Lara Logan states “A Texas hunting ranch is not the same as being in a reserve in Sagal.” ”The future for Oryx’s is Africa… not Texas.” Hunters waste so much money paying to hunt animals, however if people were to hunt they should be hunting in Africa where the animals can run away rather than being trapped in a cage. If anything hunting a caged animal is pointless, “People who kill them are cowardly.” Exclaims Lena Mesri, hunting these animals or any animals in general is pointless unless it is for survival purposes or any other logical…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s important to recognize how much of this goes on because animals play an important role in our world. To make them suffer even more than they already have to is outrageous. “Inhumane Suffering One of the most controversial aspects of hunting is the prospect that an animal may be suffering from a long and painful death,” one article says while talking about this specific issue. It comes to show that animals are greatly affected when hunters kill them. Another article heavily discusses Cecil’s death saying, “the killing of Cecil has sparked an international outcry and a backlash against big game trophy hunting.” Cecil was a lion in Zimbabwe who was the hot topic for his death and is the perfect example of the suffering of animals because he was one of many animals who experienced a death from this…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The activity of hunting wild animals for food has long been a practice of man. It is what we as humans survived off for thousands of years. An instinctual need to pursue game is still alive in many of us. Unfortunately, those who choose to fulfill this instinct are generally condemned for their actions. Now this may not seem to be such a serious deal, but I assure you there is much more to this situation than first meets the eye. The topic of hunting is very significant because it not only affects hunter’s rights, but it affects landscape, funding wildlife preservation, and tradition.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many animals endure prolonged, painful deaths when they are injured but not killed by hunters. What the author fails to consider is that most people that hunt are not hunting to just kill most are trying to feed there family or put meat in there fridge. According to peta the delicate balance of ecosystems ensures their survival if they are left unaltered. Natural predators help maintain this balance by killing only the sickest and weakest individuals. Hunters, however, kill any animal whose head they would like to hang over the fireplace including large, healthy animals who are needed to keep the population strong. Although this may be true the ecosystem is going to kill off populations a lot slower than kill animals such as deer are self, killing isn't bad if you using the deer for good causes.On private lands that are set up as for-profit hunting reserves or game ranches, hunters can pay to kill native and exotic species in “canned hunts.” This is true, but people that go out and hunt in canned hunts usually after they kill a deer they give the meat to share your harvest and help families in need.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trophy hunters think killing these big, dangerous animals keeps us safe. Many animals don’t even want to go by humans because they are scared. Most animals will only eat humans when the humans are bleeding and weak. There is a fine line between humans and wild animals. Wild animals will not cross humans territory to harm us, if they are hungry they will eat the animals around…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Hunting Essay

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hunters should hunt for food, not just for the thrill of it. The number of animals in the world has declined by 95 percent in the last century. Some hunters kill just for fun. Hunting for fun is different than hunting for food. If a person is doing it for fun it is just killing an animal that did not do anything to them. Some animals that are extinct are tigers, rare leopards, deer, and a lot of other animals . Hunting just for trophies is wrong. when you hunt you should hunt for food, not just for the trophies or money. There needs to be more protection of endangered animals in Africa from foreign hunters.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Three out of four Americans approve of hunting, partly because hunters are America’s greatest positive force for conservation.” -- Hunting in America: An Economic Force for Conservation. The way of hunting began simple. This sport provides us with food and clothes, but many people oppose hunting. People think the idea of killing animals for sport is cruel and inhumane. Hunting is forbidden in national parks and frowned upon by animal rights groups. Hunting benefits more than people think. Hunting helps habitat conservation, feed families, and is a popular sport around the world.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics