Preview

Argumentative Essay: State Of Washington Vs. Washington

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
583 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay: State Of Washington Vs. Washington
My fellow Americans, I have come to speak to you about the partisanship that we see in our government. We as Americans are witnessing a time where our government corporate with one another in the worst way possible. A time where bipartisanship has torn our government up greatly. A time were the gridlock in Congress ceases our ability to boost the economy and create jobs. A time where our government officials are more concentrated on the needs of their individual party then the needs of the American people. The fact the some in Congress may much rather see their opponents lose than to see America win, is extremely disappointing. People we have many options in this great country we live in. But what is not in option is for us to allow Washington …show more content…
I believe it is our greatest interest to make sure that our country comes first and not some party. To make sure that we allow our children to live in a nation where there needs are given to them and that our needs are given to us and that our needs are not just some pun to a group. We must not allow Washington to continue their poor habitats any longer. The change we want to see does not come from Washington, but much rather it must come to Washington. So lets us make sure that Washington knows that we will not allow them to continue fight with one another any longer. In fact we should make sure they do the opposite and make sure they work together to make policies, to continue serve us as a people and take me sure the nation continues on being the best. It is going to take time my fellow citizens, Washington will try to push us away but we will not be pushed. In the end we may not find all our goals complete but I guarantee that when we exert ourselves in making sure that we are governed by individuals who will make this nation a priority instead of their childish playground games then we have ultimately succeeded. America votes for not distortion but

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brown vs. Texas was a case heard by the Supreme Court in 1979. It determined that the defendant's arrest in El Paso Texas, for refusal to identify himself in a high crime area, was not based on a reasonable suspicion and violated Mr. Brown’s fourth amendment rights. This was an important case for the stop and identifies statutes in the United States.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mules vs. Elephants

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As George Washington retired from his presidential position in 1796, he left a grim reminder to the people of the newly independent United States of America: the independence of states, peace at home and abroad, safety, prosperity, and liberty are all dependent upon the unity between states. To promote the national strength, he urges the people to place their identity as Americans above those of their state, region, and interests. In fear of the impeding sectionalism, Washington included a fair warning to the people of the United States, the dangers of political parties to the government and the country as a whole. The idea of political parties, although warned thoroughly by our very first president, continuously solidified itself into the core of American government until it has become two standing pillars of modern politics: the Democratic Mules and its counterpart, the Republican Elephants. In 21st century politics, these two reigning parties, both having changed and altered their focus over time, have maintained a core value system, ideas beliefs, and key constituencies, which are made apparent throughout political campaigns; no better evidence than the 2012 political party platforms articulates the political position which each party represents.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Gov Outline

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “There’s Too Much Wasteful, Pork-Barrel Spending by Congress” C. “Legislators Just Bicker and Never Get Anything Done” D. “You Can’t Trust What Members of Congress Say” E. “Congress Almost Seems Designed to Promote Total Gridlock” F. “Members of Congress Compromise Too Much” G. “There’s Too Much Money in Politics Today” H. “ Members Are Out of Touch with Their Constituents ” I. “Congress Is Run by Lobbyists and Special Interest” J. Conclusion V. Key Ways Congress Could Work Better A. Declining Civility B. The Importance of Good Process C. Better White House/Congress Consultation D. True Congressional Oversight E. Improving Ethnics…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, a slave named Dred Scott went to the north with his owner. While the two men got to the north the Scott’s owner died. From this Scott looked at himself as a free man. He even sued for freedom. He argued that if is owner died in a free territory that would make him a free man. Scott went to the Supreme Court to defend his freedom. The court ruled seven to two that Dred Scott was not a free man and he had to return to slavery. Scott grew with anger and still believed he should be free. The court’s decision was final and Scott was later forced back into slavery. During the Dred Scott case Chief Justice ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and he decided to abolish it.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapters 10 through 12 in Political Polarization in American Politics explain what causes polarization and who is involved. This reading supports the ideas from chapter four which says that politics has become polarized on more issues than before due to conflict extension. Both Congress and the voters are deeply polarized, driven by two major factors, coming from a change in government and social interactions as well as a “long-term realignment”. Therefore, polarization comes from previous political beliefs and alignments, splitting Republican and Democratic opinions on how much government interaction should be present on policies such as welfare, tax cuts, and Obamacare. Increased competition leads to higher stakes in every political dispute,…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During our class discussion last week, we discussed about the polarization in our society in today’s world. In the reading by Abramowitz, he stated, “That problem was polarization. According to these observers, the sharp divisions between Democratic and Republican leaders were driving a wedge between party supporters in the electorate and alienating many moderate citizens from the political process.” This statement by Abramowitz shows us that Congress is still divided after decades of creating a political system to run America. We as a society need to be able to work together as a whole instead of being divided. There have been leaders in our society that tried to bring us together. However, no matter how hard they try to bring great minds…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalists believe that the government should not have too much power over us as a nation, due to having no desire of a repeat of British Rule, which claimed absolute rights over us as citizens, rather wanting to have additional control over their daily lives, rather than have someone control it for them. While the Federalists wanted a strong government, the Anti-Federalists did not trust British Rule not to happen again. We are opponents of the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, we as Anti-Federalists have diverse factions, such as supporters like the Articles of Confederation supporters, or the opponents to the Constitution.? Confusing thesis…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In American history, we fought long and hard to get there but there has always been a clear line in regards to our politics. We have two sides that have straightforward ideologies, and two sides that are separated for all the good of the people that are involved. In history, we had the Federalist and the Anti-federalist who stood out with different ideologies on how our country’s government should run and the rule of law should be executed. The Federalist wanted a stronger national government, and the Anti-federalist who opposed a stronger federal government.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Steven L. Taylor’s report Americans Want Their Leaders to Stand and Fight he states, “Nearly half of America—including nearly two thirds of Republicans and 53 percent of independents—admires political leaders who refuse to compromise” and, “The survey found 49 percent of all respondents admire political leaders who stick to their positions without compromising.” His report goes on to state how no compromise in a democracy is impossible due to all interests and needs being impossible to fill. Taylor’s report clearly states a lack of any compromise will maintain the status quo and nothing would be accomplished. I agree with Taylor’s report that compromise is sometimes needed or the status que will be what we are left with. But, this is only because of the current process of creating, presenting, and voting Congress is currently using. If Congress is one political party heavy the only way anything can be accomplished in the current system is through compromising. This is not what the voters want based on what was stated by the voters in Taylor’s report. The voters are clearly looking for their representatives to stand up for them and their needs with little to no compromise. The issue with not compromising in today’s system is nothing will occur, so what needs to change is the process so compromising everything is not needed to accomplish…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Choosing between two things can be a difficult decision. Especially if it something you are seeing/ doing for the first time. For example, My brothers and I are going to see a band none of us have seen before, and we cannot choose between two locations for the concert. The two choices are to stay in Michigan or go to Indiana.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One state that should be taken into some serious consideration when it comes to film and television production is Pennsylvania. The incentives this state has to often be more than enough for production companies to take a look into. Pennsylvania has an abundance of locations to offer, rural, suburban, snow, beaches/ocean, mountains, lakes/rivers, forests, and city. As part of Pennsylvania’s incentive program, they do not have a sunset date, meaning that legislation does not vote on whether or not to keep the incentive program in its state. This is already a bonus for production companies to take into major consideration and not have to worry if they can keep or even stay in the state. The incentive from Pennsylvania is that they have a 25%-30%…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With George Washington’s departure from the presidency, the former president made sure to take advantage of his popularity to pass on an important message to his nation. Washington’s took this opportunity to state not only guidelines for which he believed the country should be run, but also the dangers that the republic could face. Washington’s first warning was the danger of allowing regional identities to triumph over the single unifying identity that all members of the Union should be under: American (6). To fortify this warning, Washington reminds his audience that they have “fought and triumphed together” and have created the nation through joint effort that should not be ruined by local interests (7). Later on in the farewell address, Washington draws reference to geographical alignments and warns against the dangers of parties. Washington believes that the “Spirit of Party”, albeit inseparable from human nature, can lead individuals to place their own advancements over the republic (17). Although Washington mentions parties can serve as a check on government, he states that an effort should be made to mitigate excess power of parties in elective governments to insure that men should seek election to progress their nation and not their own…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The State of Texas is known for their strict rules on voting rights for convicts these including those who are currently incarcerated and those individuals who are released, but on parole. However, ex-offenders who have completed their probation and parole regain their voting rights but would have to re-register. I believe the voting rights for prisoners and ex-convicts should be reformed and changed in the State of Texas. The reason I stand by this is because they’re still citizens of the United States of America.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When the Constitution was written, it was not the intent of the authors to assure human rights to its citizenry, it was written in order to set up a federal government that would allow the United States to be a self-governing entity, and to put in place a system of government that would serve the citizens of the country in the way that they saw fit. After the ratification of the Constitution in 1787, “people soon began to notice that it did not list many of the personal liberties (individual rights) that they had come to believe were theirs.”(Cullop, 1999) At the behest of some states the first ten amendments were added to the Constitution that protected the personal rights of the citizens called the…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As many know, Senior Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Ken.) has launched a blockade on Obama's Supreme Court nominee (Merrick Garland) in order to prevent Democratic control of the organization. While many view McConnell's strategy as an ignorant schism, his plan has many policy implications following last night's election results (Liptak). With Republican control over both the Presidency and Congress, the party will be eligible to appoint multiple Supreme Court justices. Thus, changing the entire political spectrum of the country. A Republican dominated Supreme Court means more conservative decisions on controversial issues including gay marriage, abortion, and the second amendment.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays