Preview

Argumentative Essay On Stop And Frisk

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
515 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay On Stop And Frisk
To frisk, or not to frisk? That is the question many may be asking after the first presidential debate on September 26th, 2016. During that debate, the topic of ‘stop and frisk’ came about and Donald Trump strongly advocated the extensive use of it. Lester Holt, the debate’s moderator, interjected himself into the conversation and attempted to fact-check Trump by claiming, erroneously so, that ‘stop and frisk’ is unconstitutional. So, is this policing policy being utilized appropriately? Two days after the debate, previous New York City mayor, Republican Rudolph Giuliani, and current NYC mayor, Democrat Bill de Blasio, both published articles containing their views on the subject of this police tactic. They were titled, “Trump is right about ‘stop and frisk.’ Lester Holt should apologize” and, “Trump is wrong on stop-and-frisk”, …show more content…
Bradshaw ruled 8-1 in favor of ‘stop and frisk’ being constitutional. Giuliani also advocates for the “careful and appropriate” use of ‘stop and frisk’ in preventing crime and lowering crime rates. De Blasio states in his article that Trump is wrong about what quantity is enough, and the overall effectiveness of this practice. He believes that ‘stop and frisk’ can be divisive in communities if used excessively, and is not as effective as other crime-fighting methods. Therefore he is, “combining just enough stop-and-frisk, with precision policing to fight crime effectively and allow police and communities to envision a better future -- together.” Interestingly, these articles both agree that ‘stop and frisk’ is constitutional, and that it should be used in small quantities so as to be most effective. De Blasio is simply making the point that Donald Trump is wrong about the amount of ‘stop and frisk’, while Giuliani makes the statement that Trump is right about ‘stop and frisk’s
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Criminology - Causes of the 2011 London Riots
    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Criminology - Causes of the 2011 London Riots

    Bowling, B. and Phillips C., (2007) “Disproportionate and Discriminatory: Reviewing the Evidence on Police Stop and Search”. Modern Law Review. 70(6)…

    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Study
    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Terry V. Ohio Case Study

    In 1963, a Cleveland detective observed three gentlemen hanging out in front of a store and their behavior was somewhat suspicious. The detective suspected that the two gentlemen were planning to rob the store, so he decided to conduct a pat-down Terry and discovered a revolver in his coat. Subsequently, Terry was charged with carrying a concealed weapon and later found guilty. The petitioner claimed that "stop and frisk" constituted an unreasonable search and seizure. In 1968, the Supreme Court established the standard for allowing police officers to perform a stop and frisk of a suspect in Terry v. Ohio case. Furthermore, a stop and frisk is detaining a person by law enforcement officer for the purpose of an investigation, accompanied by…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Terry Vs Ohio Case Study
    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Terry Vs Ohio Case Study

    The first sentence of Chief Justice Warren's opinion in Terry v Ohio, is as follows: "This case presents serious questions concerning the role of the Fourth Amendment in the confrontation on the street between the citizen and the policeman investigating suspicious circumstances.” According to Chief Justice Warren this issue had never been approached in the Supreme Court. Warren also stated “This case is dealing on the one hand with is frequently argued that in dealing with the rapidly unfolding and often dangerous situations on city streets the police are in need of an escalating set of flexible responses, graduated in relation to the amount of information they possess. For this purpose it is urged that distinctions should be made between a "stop" and an "arrest" (or a "seizure" of a person), and between a "frisk" and a "search." He believed this could be imposed because it was a minor inconvenience to the person being searched and was acceptable in order for effective law enforcement and secure the safety of the…

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Florida Vs Harris Case Study
    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Florida Vs Harris Case Study

    In his article Florida v. Harris: Turning Police Dogs into Search Warrants on a Leash, John Whitehead questions the intentions of both police officers and Supreme Court judges, who seem to be condoning and ruling in favor of unconstitutional searches of American citizens. The criteria for what qualifies as probable cause has now been left up to the judgement of an officer. With variance in why a search should be conducted, Americans are left in the dark when it comes to their own rights. Although the Constitution outlines these rights, their interpretations gets lost when the Supreme Court rules in the favor or those who seem to be abusing their power rather than using it to protect the American people. .…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Analysis
    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Terry V. Ohio Case Analysis

    Is a person's sudden flight from identifiable police officer, patrolling a high crime area, suspicious to justify the officer's stop and frisk of that person? This was the question that the justices of the Supreme Court were asking themselves when they heard the case of Illinois v. Wardlow on the date of November 2, 1999.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Labeling Theory: Floyd Vs. City Of New York
    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Labeling Theory: Floyd Vs. City Of New York

    In April of 2007 an African American man studying to be a doctor, is stopped and frisked by three New York City Police Officers. The man, 33 year old David Floyd said he was not doing anything suspicious. This is the now famous case of Floyd v City of New York which challenged stop and frisks as discriminatory and unconstitutional. The judge ruled stop and frisk cases like Floyd vs New York are discriminatory and police tactics like this must be reformed. Because not only are people being treated unfairly, they become labeled as criminals and often go on to live up to that kind of expectation.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Terry Stop Case Study
    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Terry Stop Case Study

    Justice Harlan wholeheartedly agree with the Court 's ultimate holding in this case, He was constrained to fill in a few gaps, as he saw it because what was said by this Court has serve as initial guidelines for law enforcement authorities and courts throughout the land as this important new field of law develops. A police officer 's right to make an on-the-street "stop" and an accompanying "frisk" for weapons is, of course, bounded by the protections afforded by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court holds and he agrees, that, while the right does not depend upon possession by the officer of a valid warrant, nor upon the existence of probable cause, such activities must be reasonable under the circumstances as the officer credibly relates them in court. Since the question in this and most cases is whether evidence produced by a frisk is admissible, the problem is to determine what makes a frisk reasonable. Concealed weapons create an immediate and severe danger to the public, and though that danger might not warrant routine general weapons checks, it could well warrant action on less than a "probability." In the absence of state authority, policemen have no more right to "pat down" the outer clothing of passers-by, or of persons to whom they address casual questions, than does any other citizen. Consequently, the Ohio courts did not rest the constitutionality of this frisk upon any…

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stop Frisk Case Study
    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stop Frisk Case Study

    I want to speak and elaborate on stop frisk on both parties perception. Both parties I mean as is the police and also the people, I am going to explain the pros, cons and factual and how this could be effective plus how it could be a hassle as well.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stop And Frisk Case Study
    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Stop And Frisk Case Study

    He defends the policy of stop-and-frisk and tries to explain why it is one of the reasons New York City is the safest big city in America. Kelly was planning on defending his views on the situation when he was dropped as a defendant in the stop-and-frisk case. Mayor Bloomberg was dropped as a defendant as well. Kelly devoted a whole chapter to stop-and-frisk in his memoir, “Vigilance: My Life Serving America and Protecting Its Empire City.” In the book he defends stop-and-frisk on the issue of race, Kelly writes,…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling Summary
    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Racial Profiling Summary

    One could also argue that the president of the U.S, Donald Trump, claimed that the use of stop and frisk reduced crime in NYC. However, what Johnson and Trump fail to realize is that the data they are referring to is all inaccurate because it was based on racial profiling. The use of stop and frisk proved that officers focus more on skin color rather than the behavior of an individual, proving that criminological data will mostly always be inaccurate. According to the accurate data presented by Christopher Mathias, nearly 80% of stops were blacks and Latinos and 13% of them were whites yet, “a weapon was found in only 1.8 percent of blacks and Latinos frisked, as compared to a weapon being found in 3.8 percent of whites frisked.” Over 70% of the stops were blacks and Latinos and still whites had a higher percentage of carrying a weapon, which is over 50% of the cause for…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Intrude In The United States
    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Examples Of Intrude In The United States

    Ohio, the Supreme Court of the United States held that police can stop and frisk a person if the officer has suspicion that the person has committed a crime, planning a crime, or about to commit a crime. The officer only has to have a reasonable belief that there is a weapon on their person. This “stop and frisk” is for the safety of the officer and everyone involved. When the law was passed, there was controversy surrounding how the police were choosing who got stopped and not. Many of the officers were taking it upon themselves to use racial profiling in the stop causing a race war against the police.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The concept of stop and frisk
    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The concept of stop and frisk

    In an effort to maximize an individuals rights during search and seizures along with stop-and-frisks, the United States government has developed numerous laws and amendments. The Fourth Amendment states, The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Constitution). This amendment was first used in the court system in the case of Terry vs. Ohio (1968). This case was the case that shaped the stop-and-frisk laws that are found in our country today. In 1942 legislators started to authorize stops-and-frisks on less than probable cause under the Uniform Arrest Act. This act gave an officer the right stop a person in public based upon reasonable ground to suspect that the person is committing has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and then search him for a dangerous weapon if the officer has reasonable ground to believe that he is in danger (Whitebread, 2000). In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Holder's Argument Against Racial Profiling
    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Holder's Argument Against Racial Profiling

    These federal laws don’t apply everywhere, two examples of place that they wouldn’t be applied is border patrols at the country’s southwest boundaries as well as airline security. Twenty states don’t have laws against racial profiling because there is no uniform standard for police departments in communities. Profiling is beginning to cause arguments between law enforcement and pedestrians, one main topic is the new stop-and-frisk program. As the program continually increased the amount of fallouts the judge finally deemed the program to disturb the rights of the minority residents. France, is a highly populated area that also has many profiling concerns most concerning Arabs and blacks. These concerns were brought to court where they were then dismissed by a judge in…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Racial Profiling Wrong
    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is Racial Profiling Wrong

    He states and thinks that the stops they are making are wrong and a form of harassment. When the blacks and Hispanics were stopped they were frightened and they did not know what they were doing wrong. Quotes by Herbert in this article, “Humiliation of black and Hispanic New Yorkers, including children, by the police officers do not feel that they need to treat them the same no matter their age.” The second quote is “Even the official reasons given by the police for the stops are actually laughably bogus.” I think he is still trying to get through to the readers that it is wrong and a form of harassment. In the article “Trayvon Martin shooter told cops teenager went for his gun” by Matt Gutman, blacks and Hispanics were profiled for having a record and not even knowing it, I think the police officers…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Law Enforcement
    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Law Enforcement

    Imagine coming home one day and having to be told that one of your loved ones has died for something as simple as a traffic offense or a fistfight with a friend. Of course these actions are not justified, but are they really deserving of being killed? Recently here in the USA there have been numerous deaths of young African American men by the police for very small offenses, and many say these deaths are fueled by racism. A great example of this is in Milwaukee in which 23 year-old Syville Smith was running from his car at a traffic stop and was shot in the chest and arm, eventually leading to death. This event much like others really brings up the question, how do recent events in Milwaukee impact the law enforcement’s reputation across the country and…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics