Preview

Argumentative Essay On Animal Rights

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
744 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay On Animal Rights
Jocelyn Negrete
Walker
ERWC Period 3
5 November 2014
Animal Rights Essay Throughout the United States, and many other countries, there is debate on whether or not animals should have rights. Some strongly believe animals should be given rights, due to their capability of feeling pain and emotions. Others believe they should not be given rights because the human race is far more superior and cannot be comparable to other species. It is disappointing acknowledging, that there are individuals who under estimate the capabilities of other creatures. Yet, the question remains, should other species be granted rights? Personally, I am torn between the two, but lean more towards the idea that different species should have rights. Jeremy Rifkin, author
…show more content…
Animals are also capable of feeling pain, even though they may not be able to express it. In the article, “Hooked on a Myth” by Victoria Braithwaite, she explains that a study conducted on fish has revealed they have “nerve endings called nociceptors [that alert them] to the damage” when they are hooked by their mouth or have irritating substances in their systems. The same nerve endings are found in humans and serve the same function. Yet, we ignore their sense of pain when they are fished out of their environments. This concept may also be relevant to organisms that are victims of sport hunting. The article “Why Sport Hunting is Cruel and Unnecessary”, published by the PETA organization, stated that animals who become victims of this sport “endure prolonged, painful deaths when they are injured but not killed by hunters”. The most common form of death of these animals is …show more content…
This is true in many countries, including the United States. Animals have been ripped away from their natural environments and kept in captivity for our selfish pleasures. In the film, Frontline: A Whale of a Business, it is documented that marine animals, such as dolphins are caught in dry fisheries in Asian countries. During the process, dolphins are directed into a lagoon, where they are enclosed by surrounding boats. Then trainers, like those at SeaWorld, choose dolphins that have the potential to survive in their enclosures. Those that are not chosen are brutally murdered by the fishermen with weapons. The same brutality occurs in factory farms in the U.S. According to the article, “What is a Factory Farm?” published by the ASPCA organization, farms animals that are used for consumption are raised in tiny enclosures and in large quantities. They experience mutilations to different body parts, like tails, horns, and beaks without anything to eliminate the pain. In these enclosures, they are also “[denied] individualized veterinary care” resulting in poor

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals and humans were created to coexist on this earth and therefore should receive fair treatment. Many cannot fathom the idea of initiating legal rights for animals. Some may even perceive it as absurd to dedicate and focus time on non-human animals. The main problem is that humans have advanced significantly, establishing a complex intellect that other species lack. Humans possess many capabilities that are distinct from those of others.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Evil of Animal ‘Rights’” by Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook addresses the issue of medical testing on animals. The authors describe the dangers of a world without medical testing, as well as the benefits that come of this testing. They discuss the violent nature of protesters, the effect this violence has on the companies and individuals involved in the field, and the ramifications the world would face were these professionals not allowed to further their work. Epstein and Brook strongly support medical testing on animals, however they fail to completely deliver their view due to alienation of their audience.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article “ A change of Heart about Animals” by Rifkin, he states “ They feel pain, suffer, and experiences stress, affection, excitement and even love--and these findings are changing how we view animals.” These characteristics are just like any human being they feel pain just as we feel pain, they suffer just like we do too therefore i agree that they should have the same rights as us humans. Although many other people might say they're just animals but they realize they are species just like us humans.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If humans have been given rights of their own, animals should have rights, too. Animals don’t deserve to be experimented on. They feel pain just as humans. We shouldn’t take animals for granted. They have a huge part in our world’s natural cycle. In Lisa Kemmerer’s article titled “Animal Rights” she asserts the issue of what defines animal rights. She addresses the fact that animals need rights just as humans. Ms. Kemmerer subtopics consist of the challenges that follow animal rights, the importance of animal rights, and the reasons why we need to consider standing up for animal rights. As Lisa Kemmerer states, “Animal rights is a simple idea because, at the most basic level, it means only that animal share a right to be treated with respect. It is a profound idea because its implications are far-reaching” (275). It is very important to acknowledge that animals need to be treated with respect. Animals are unable to voice their own rights. It is our duty to use our own rights to advocate the rights of animals. Without advocates for the rights of animals, our economic system may drop from unlawful standards. As a second writer suggests that as human we have moral obligations to not judge one by their outward appearance, skin colour, and ethical background yet we seem to judge animals without considering their feelings (274). We have such an impact on animals that we must stand up for animals and protect them. If we don’t take a…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is the goal of all evolution. Until we stop harming all other living beings, we are still savages.” This quote about animal abuse is from Thomas Edison, an engineer known for his life changing innovations that continue to impact on our world today. Animal abuse is a long-debated problem, often causing the world’s population to split into two sides over the dispute. On one side, are those who say that humans are far superior to animals and other living beings who have been put here solely to feed or entertain us. On the other hand, there are those of us who recognise that these “inferior life forms” should have the same rights as us, and so they deserve the same treatment.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal rights are a common altercation when looked at from a medical standpoint and from an equality view. Two authors construct essays discussing the opposing views of animal rights. The first author, Cohen, approaches the need of animal rights from a medical standpoint, while Regan addresses the morality of zoos and the equality of animals. Regan and Cohen differentiate animal rights by addressing the value and equality of animals in regards to animals testing and animal captivity. In this essay, Cohen and Regan’s arguments will both be addressed along with differences and similarities between the two arguments.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years, the debate of whether animals have moral rights or not has been thrown around court rooms, social media, and protests. Arguments are made defending animals and suggesting that they should be protected and recognized in human society. Medical researchers are scrutinized and harassed by these supporters for their part in animal testing and medical investigation. Scientific breakthroughs have been made, which has transformed the development of modern medicine. Lifespans have elongated and lives are being saved in every corner of the world, yet somehow, this is still debated as if it is the wrong thing to do. Research animals are pertinent tools of the medical world and humans are entitled to use them as such. As human beings with…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of my life I have had a tremendous amount of passion for all animals, and in most instances I've found that I have felt more comfortable around them than I do people, finding myself drawn to their many personable qualities, such as innocence, loyalty, lack of judgment, and overall cheerful disposition. As I have grown, my care for animals and their well being has as well, and my eyes have been opened to the horrors taking place all throughout the globe involving poor, innocent animals, who are unable to defend themselves, against the very people they are meant to find companionship with. The controversy over the practice of utilizing animals for the purposes of testing has been an issue for the past 30-40 years, and with it, comes the moral debate. However, the topic of ongoing question, whether animal testing is right or wrong, lies within your own personal morals.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why should the rights that were fought for by our late independent heroes and civil right activists be extended to non-human animals that could not socially speak for themselves? Since animals do not have the capacity to personally fight for their rights, granting what humans had put in their blood for to enjoy to non-human animals will be a scenario of robbing Peter to pay Paul and hence an injustice to humans. Therefore animal rights movement is simply a misguided attempt to force people to grant animals the same qualities, needs and desires as human beings. While this movement is born out of kindness and sympathy, I think it is completely misguided because non-human animals are in actual sense, equal to human beings and hence do not deserve equal right as enjoyed by human…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals should not have rights also because animals don’t respect our rights. As humans if one…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Issitt, Micah & Newton, Heather (2011), p2-2, 1p - Animals Deserve the Same Rights as Humans.…

    • 2250 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humans do not own the Earth. Animals are not obligated to provide them any services, despite the objections of many people. Animals are constantly poked, probed, or burned for the benefit of the human race. We are allowed medicines that cure or treat chronic illnesses due to the sacrifices made by animals, yet we treat them with disrespect because we see them as inferior. An Animal Bill of Rights is necessary. Animals should be protected as much as human beings are, because without them we may not even be alive. If an Animal Bill of Rights is the incentive for humans to treat animals with respect, then so be it.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many scientists have done research on how an animal's mind might work in feeling different kinds of pain. In an article entitled “Hooked on a Myth” written by Victoria Braithwaite, she writes about a fish that had been experimented on to see how it might react when being injected with vinegar or bee venom under the skin. “There gills beat faster, and they rub the affected area on the walls of their tank, lose interest in food and have problems making decisions.”(Braithwaite pg36 sec.4). This shows that, yes, the animal is susceptible to feeling pain and reacting towards it. However, later in…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays