Preview

Argumentative Essay: Is John Brown A Terrorist?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
448 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay: Is John Brown A Terrorist?
Is John brown a terrorist or revolutionary. Well lets see, I believe that john brown was a terrorist for 3 reason, my first proof reason is that his initial plan was to take control of the federal armory and after that cease control of all the weapons and use them to arm and free slaves all across the south. My second reason is that John Brown has a long line of insane family members. My third and final proof is that john brown is abolitionist but not antislavery. I believe that John Brown isn't a terrorist because he wanted to free slaves from bondage.
I believe that John brown is a terrorist because he wanted to take a federal armory and use it against citizens and mind you American citizens for a just cause. I believe that even if his plan had actually worked in his favor there would be a mass panick and bounties out everywhere signaling to the people that this man is armed and
…show more content…
Brown was completely insane I mean this guys a nut job. He had multiple family members inside insane asylum including three aunts, two uncles, his only sister, her daughter, and six first cousins., Now this is ultimately the case with John brown here as you can see not a shining image of mental health. John Brown also thought he was following Gods will when he raided and killed and pillaged. When it came time to go to court for John Brown he and his defense attorneys had decided that the only way to save him is that he needed to plead medically insane which I belive he is. My third and final reason that I belive John Brown is a terrorist is that John Brown was Abolitionist not a proponet of anti-slavery. Anti-slavery meant no slaves for the north bu keep the slaves for the southerners. Where abolitionist disagreed and wanted to have all slavery abolished. With that I belive that the abolitionist having this radical point of view would give them the chance to do more drastic things. To get there pint across to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Paddling along in a second-hand canoe saving lives and helping people definitely aren’t the characteristics of terrorist. Yet Zeitoun was the bad guy. Of course the area of New Orleans was in a very fragile state, however, it’s not right to be labeled as a terrorist just because of your origins. To me, it’s wrong and disgusting that people go through things like this daily. I would’ve wanted to fight back with all my might if I was in Zeitoun’s shoes. Being arrested for something that was thrown onto you because of false judgment is unreasonable and…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a terrorist ever did intend on terrorising our country, there would be more plausible methods for them to carry out their action. It would only be natural to assume that they would be associated with a larger organisation, possess large amounts of money and be well-connected to the underground, allowing them to travel more comfortably in a plane rather than travel meaninglessly and unnecessarily on an expensive and unstable boat…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John brown was about…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terrorism is just a general idea. We as individual find very hard to determine who our main enemies are and what we should do against them. As stated on the book, the U.S constitution makes terrorists very closer to us. We can not determine the terrorists since every people around us are the same. Basically, we can not fight the war on terror by ourselves; thus, everyone should cooperate. The best way to fight on this war is cooperating with our government. From the beginning of this war, many people have criticized the government actions which focus too much on the War on Terror. Many people believe that government tries to take away individuals’ Civil Rights and Liberties. In my opinions, I think some of those ideas are wrong. Many said that the government has accessed more on our individuals’ privacy; but I think it is necessary for the government to have such actions. As I stated above, it is difficult to determine who the actual terrorists are, our government should minimize the possible of terrorist’s attacks. Generally, it is more logical to sacrifice our own liberty, rather than sacrifice the lives of our…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He goes on to explain that for an act of terrorism to be considered before an act of war is because of the just war tradition. The just war tradition has two main divisions which help us to understand when a war should happen and what needs to be considered during the…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terrorism is defined in more ways than one, it can also be used in a variety of ways.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “A terrorist is one who sows terror,” says Elshtain. She means that the victims of terrorist attacks are subjected to terror, or great fear. The purpose of subjecting a group of people to such fear varies but usually aims to destroy the morale of a people in its attempt at some religious, political, or ideological goal. Crucial features of inducing terror are its randomness and its attack on civilians as opposed to combatants. This elicits fear in every person because they are afraid for their personal safety in their day to day lives, as opposed to fearing only for our soldiers. To determine who is a terrorist, we must ask who they are attacking. Do they mainly target combatants in the field or bases, do they try to destroy military equipment and are they open to negotiations? If so, we should not label them terrorists for simply being enemy combatants. However, if they are deliberately targeting noncombatants with the intention of killing as many civilians as possible, they are clearly terrorists.…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments about race being the underlining factor to why Brown was killed and Wilson wasn’t convicted cannot be proven and undermines us being in control of our own actions. From the specific circumstances, it doesn’t make logical sense to say that he was killed just because he was black. Why is it that people focus on his race rather that his terrible actions as a human being, which led to his death? This is because we as a country have allowed people to play the race victimization card in order to pass the buck on solving the real problem. Let's pretend that race was the actual problem in America and they are victims of a corrupt system. How do “victims” who account for 12.6 percent of the population commit 52.5 percent of homicides in…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After 9/11, Bush coined the phrase “war on terror.” This war was revengeful and aimed at every country tied to al Qaeda. As a result, the nation stereotyped religions and people as terrorists. Once Obama was in office, he declared the “war on terror” to be over. However, the rifts still exist. While the “war on terror” is over, Trumps actions from deeper and more ignorant prejudices. The new administration could produce a documentary calling Americans to fight against “the others,” but this would add to the pile of propaganda in existence. Also, the sides supporting and rejecting “the war on terror” are so heavily rooted in political difference. Therefore, the government attempting to persuade the war through documentary to continue would create…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many historians believe that the pre-Civil War antislavery activist John Brown would be considered the first American domestic terrorist. Terrorism is defined as using fear through violence to achieve a goal, especially for political purposes. It is obvious that Brown had these qualities. Even before coming into light as an antislavery extremist he had an incident at his home where he barricaded himself and two of his sons with muskets to avoid losing the home. In this example no shots were fired, but this would not be the case in the future. After a string of failures in the work force, Brown began having fantasies about being “God’s messenger, a latter-day Moses who would lead his people from the accursed house of slavery.” (Pg. 355) He began working in the Underground Railroad and giving public sermons about abolishing slavery by any means. But it wasn’t until the Pottawatomie Massacre that Brown could have been dubbed a terrorist. This and Harpers Ferry were the two major acts that history remembers John Brown for. These actions would classify Brown as a domestic terrorist during the pre-Civil War era. But of course he was not the only one, and he diffidently wasn’t the first. There are accounts of American domestic terrorism stretching all the way back to the American Revolution. Even in his own time, John Brown cannot be rightly classified as the Father of American Terrorism. There were others like Nat Turner, Thomas Higginson, and even Preston Brooks could have all been considered American terrorists. Many of these people used their connection with God as reasoning for their actions, just as Brown did. So this would classify Brown as a terrorist, but not necessarily the Father of American Terrorism…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Dictionary.com, the definition of “terrorist” is “a person, usually a member of a group, who advocates terrorism or a person who frightens others.” As for the phase “freedom fighter”, it refers to “a person who battles against established forces of tyranny and dictatorship.”…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being a terrorist or freedom fighter truly depends on which side you are. For example the Austro-Hungarians most likely thought Gavrilo Princip was a terrorist because he disturbed their rein of power, however to the Serbians, Gavrilo was most likely seen as a freedom fighter. Furthermore the best way to decide is to be an un-biased third party. First off looking at the definitions and looking at widely regarded terrorist attack such as 911, we look at why Gavrilo attacked. In 911 terrorists attack another countries citizen in their own country, the key part is that it was in another person’s country. Looking at Gavrilo he attacked the political party that over took his country. He simply wanted his own country back, he was filled with sovereignty. Furthermore it’s who (person) he attacked and the power of that person. As we already know Franz Ferdinand was the next to rule the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Gavrilo and the rest of the Black Hand did not attack any citizens or powerful people to make a point. They attacked to stop the tyranny over their country; they shed the least amount of blood. It wasn’t to tell of the Austro-Hungarians, and say they can kill everyone. It was to say this is our country, we demand sovereignty. They wanted to stop their rule right then and there. To further understand why this was done, we look at for whom it was for, and why Gavrilo joined the Black Hand. Gavrilo was dying of tuberculoses, he wasn’t doing it solely for himself, he looked at how oppressed his people were and wanted to do something meaningful with the remander of his life. In the video we watched it said Gavrilo wanted to be remembered. He knew he was dying but he failed to act the first time because he was scared, he still could have shot even with the commotion that happened earlier. However he did fail to act, now this doesn’t sound like a terrorist or villain. Yes further on he shot Franz because he knew this was what needed to be done. Finally Gavrilo attacked…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * “Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev indicted. Mr Tsarnaev, 19, faces 30 total charges in the 15 April blasts, which killed three and injured more than 260 others. The brothers are from a family of ethnic Chechen Muslims from Russia and had been living in the US for about a decade.” - All Muslims are terrorist.…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defining Terrorism

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Martha Crenshaw said that terrorism means socially and politically unacceptable violence aimed at an innocent target to achieve a psychological effect. She also sited three criteria to make it a terrorist attack. The first is that there must be military methods used. Second there must be a military…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causes Of Being Terrorist

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What are terrorist? terrorist is a person who uses unlawful and intimidation, they are against innocent people, in the political war terrorist believe in justice. Terrorist will find away to get justice when they feel like no one hears them out. Terrorist are really getting out of hand that america wants to declare war on terrorist . but they don’t know what terrorist is. Terrorist are violent, non-combatant people, their intentions are to put fear into those targets. Do you ever wonder what are terrorist? Terrorist…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays