This article was about human cloning. For this article to be a strong argument it has to prove its point and have lots of details. The title of this article is “Human Cloning. The topic of my article is cloning. This article is trying to prove that cloning is the right thing to do. In my opinion this article is strong because it contains a lot of facts and details. This article is trying to prove that human cloning is right. “I argue for cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants”. “There are no problems with identical twins so why should there be a problem with clones”. As a result, human cloning may have advantages but no disadvantages. I believe the argument is strong. The one quote that made me side with this article was “I argue for human cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants. The argument in this article is that cloning is a good thing. I believe this article because it has more facts and details than opinions. The author of this article persuades me to believe the article is true. The author of this article gives lots of facts and details to make me believe it’s true. In closing, it’s easy to say that this article is strong.
Human Cloning
This article was about human cloning. For this article to be a strong argument it has to prove its point and have lots of details. The title of this article is “Human Cloning. The topic of my article is cloning. This article is trying to prove that cloning is the right thing to do. In my opinion this article is strong because it contains a lot of facts and details. This article is trying to prove that human cloning is right. “I argue for cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants”. “There are no problems with identical twins so why should there be a problem with clones”. As a result, human cloning may have advantages but no disadvantages. I believe the argument is strong. The one quote that made me side with this article was “I argue for human cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants. The argument in this article is that cloning is a good thing. I believe this article because it has more facts and details than opinions. The author of this article persuades me to believe the article is true. The author of this article gives lots of facts and details to make me believe it’s true. In closing, it’s easy to say that this article is strong.
Human Cloning
This article was about human cloning. For this article to be a strong argument it has to prove its point and have lots of details. The title of this article is “Human Cloning. The topic of my article is cloning. This article is trying to prove that cloning is the right thing to do. In my opinion this article is strong because it contains a lot of facts and details. This article is trying to prove that human cloning is right. “I argue for cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants”. “There are no problems with identical twins so why should there be a problem with clones”. As a result, human cloning may have advantages but no disadvantages. I believe the argument is strong. The one quote that made me side with this article was “I argue for human cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants. The argument in this article is that cloning is a good thing. I believe this article because it has more facts and details than opinions. The author of this article persuades me to believe the article is true. The author of this article gives lots of facts and details to make me believe it’s true. In closing, it’s easy to say that this article is strong.
Human Cloning
This article was about human cloning. For this article to be a strong argument it has to prove its point and have lots of details. The title of this article is “Human Cloning. The topic of my article is cloning. This article is trying to prove that cloning is the right thing to do. In my opinion this article is strong because it contains a lot of facts and details. This article is trying to prove that human cloning is right. “I argue for cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants”. “There are no problems with identical twins so why should there be a problem with clones”. As a result, human cloning may have advantages but no disadvantages. I believe the argument is strong. The one quote that made me side with this article was “I argue for human cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants. The argument in this article is that cloning is a good thing. I believe this article because it has more facts and details than opinions. The author of this article persuades me to believe the article is true. The author of this article gives lots of facts and details to make me believe it’s true. In closing, it’s easy to say that this article is strong.
Human Cloning
This article was about human cloning. For this article to be a strong argument it has to prove its point and have lots of details. The title of this article is “Human Cloning. The topic of my article is cloning. This article is trying to prove that cloning is the right thing to do. In my opinion this article is strong because it contains a lot of facts and details. This article is trying to prove that human cloning is right. “I argue for cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants”. “There are no problems with identical twins so why should there be a problem with clones”. As a result, human cloning may have advantages but no disadvantages. I believe the argument is strong. The one quote that made me side with this article was “I argue for human cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants. The argument in this article is that cloning is a good thing. I believe this article because it has more facts and details than opinions. The author of this article persuades me to believe the article is true. The author of this article gives lots of facts and details to make me believe it’s true. In closing, it’s easy to say that this article is strong.
Human Cloning
This article was about human cloning. For this article to be a strong argument it has to prove its point and have lots of details. The title of this article is “Human Cloning. The topic of my article is cloning. This article is trying to prove that cloning is the right thing to do. In my opinion this article is strong because it contains a lot of facts and details. This article is trying to prove that human cloning is right. “I argue for cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants”. “There are no problems with identical twins so why should there be a problem with clones”. As a result, human cloning may have advantages but no disadvantages. I believe the argument is strong. The one quote that made me side with this article was “I argue for human cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants. The argument in this article is that cloning is a good thing. I believe this article because it has more facts and details than opinions. The author of this article persuades me to believe the article is true. The author of this article gives lots of facts and details to make me believe it’s true. In closing, it’s easy to say that this article is strong.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Reproductive cloning on the other hand won’t be good as well. In the article's reproductive cloning arguments pro and con it is mentioned that “Reproductive cloning would diminish the uniqueness of an individual.” Reproducing a child is the most beautiful moment you can experience. Mostly because your partner (that you love) and you have created a human being that won’t look similar to any other person. Cloning yourself to have a “child” will ruin the perspective of bearing or raising an actual kid. Having a clone as your “child” wouldn’t be a great idea. Hhaving a kid is a major difference than having a kid that looks exactly like you in every way. Those who can’t bear children because of multiple reasons have the opportunity to adopt a child. Why want more when you can get a kid without going through so much…
- 801 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the main issues that cloning brings about is whether or not people will take advantage of this new technology. For instance, Lewis Thomas wonders if “the rich and powerful but socially objectionable” or the “governments of dumb, docile masses” will misuse the technology. These seemingly important people may be able to give themselves a “version of immortality”. Just because the ability to clone exists does not mean that valuable people should be able to multiply themselves. No one on Earth is exactly the same for a reason, and it should stay that way. If there were to be several hundred Paris Hiltons or Kim Kardashians walking around, the world would be a pretty terrifying place. People should remain unique, separate from the “precise sameness” that Thomas…
- 686 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
What was once thought to be the content of fiction novels and comic books is now being fully explored and realized in the cutting edge world of modern science. Scientists now possess the necessary capabilities and technology to make the process of human cloning a reality. While this is a controversial and rather sensitive topic, cloning is an innovative practice that has the potential to vastly improve the lives of unlimited amounts of people. Although cloning may prove to be a useful remedy for many of today’s issues, there are those in the scientific and medical fields who remain vehemently opposed to its practice. It is for this reason that lawmakers, scientists, and doctors around the world are currently locked in a fierce standoff that will determine what if any, impact that cloning will have upon our ever-changing society. Each side has compiled substantial evidence against the other as to why cloning should or should not be legalized and practiced. It is my strong belief that the curative effects that could be reaped by practicing cloning far outweigh the arguments of anti-cloning advocates; the practice of human cloning should be legalized and practiced. Countless individuals could benefit from its various applications and the future of medicine would be drastically enhanced.…
- 1534 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
"Human Cloning & Bioethics - Reason Why People Object?." HubPages. HubPages, 16 06 2011. Web. 2 Feb 2013. .…
- 1833 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
In the article that I chose there are two opposing viewpoints on the issue of "Should Human Cloning Ever Be Permitted?" John A. Robertson is an attorney who argues that there are many potential benefits of cloning and that a ban on privately funded cloning research is unjustified and that this type of research should only be regulated. On the flip side of this issue Attorney and medical ethicist George J. Annas argues that cloning devalues people by depriving them of their uniqueness and that a ban should be implemented upon it. Both express valid points and I will critique the articles to better understand their points.…
- 1857 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Starting with an explanation of what cloning is and the two main types of the technology: reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning, this paper goes on to explore the ramifications these technologies may have in different areas of our society with respect to government, funding issues for research, religious views, education for our children on cloning issues and lastly the publics response to cloned animal produce.…
- 1913 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
For many years, scientists have been experimenting in the field of cloning. Cloning uses an egg cell and a somatic cell to make a duplicate copy of the organism. It is currently a highly controversial topic in the scientific world. Many people can benefit from cloning. From farmers to patients, not only does cloning help scientists discover more about genetics, it will also help a lot of people. However, there are also ethical issues with cloning, such as the use of embryonic stem cells and cross-species hybrids. For instance, at the Salk institute, a human-pig embryo was recently made and destroyed. The purpose of the experiment was to see if human organs could be grown inside a pig. The authors believe that we are still far off from accomplishing cloning of human organs in animals. I believe that cloning will help this world, but there needs to be restrictions on human cloning and cross-breeding.…
- 586 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In this two-part viewpoint, David A. Prentice and William Saunders discuss the science and the ethics of therapeutic cloning. In the first part, Prentice argues that creating clones for the purpose of embryonic stem cell research, called "therapeutic cloning," is no different from reproductive cloning, which creates a living human child. Also, he points out, therapeutic cloning is not therapeutic for the embryo. In the second part of the viewpoint, Saunders builds on Prentice's argument and goes even…
- 3138 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In conclusion, all of Kass’s objections make valid point on why cloning us unethical in our current society. The objections can be seen as premature thoughts because we are not living in the actual era of cloning. Cloning is still very experimental and we do not know all the benefits and effects of cloning. Therefore, some of Kass’s arguments can be ruled out. Even if cloning is improved and become beneficial one question that will remain is, is it ethical to…
- 671 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In his work from 2002 “Religion and Human Cloning: An Exploratory Analysis of the First Available Opinion Data”, John Evans proudly states a few possible benefits, or advantages, of human ‘therapeutic’ cloning. While talking about embryonic stem cells, he states “these cells can eventually be used to treat diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and kidney failure, to name but a few…”(748). These possibilities have mostly been confirmed since the publishing of Evans’ piece and other more incredible possibilities have come about. The benefits of both reproductive and therapeutic cloning are endless, yet many still disagree. They say that cloning is dangerous and that it would end human evolution and bring disaster to society as we know it (Mautner, 68). Do most people really think this is true? Or is modern society simply scared of the unknown and not ready for change? Many scientists and authors constantly debate the ethics and possibilities of human cloning, both for reproductive use and therapeutic use. A couple of possible risks would accompany the beginning of human cloning, however the benefits are legitimate, and we as a species should reconsider.…
- 1336 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
In order to strongly argue against cloning, there must be an understanding of its process and what exactly it is. Simply stated, a clone is a duplicate just like a photocopy. A good example of such "copies" that occur are identical twins, which are duplicates of each other. "The first step of DNA cloning is to isolate a complete gene and is to chromosomal sequences and then to gradually begin flaking the chromosomal sequences of a single DAN molecule. Then the DNA clone can be electronically labeled and used as a probe to isolate the chromosomal sequences from a collection of different types of genes, which should contain cloned sequences that would represent the whole gene. This action will produce new sets of cloned cells identical to the mother cell. The new set of cells are isolated and likewise the simplified process is repeated all over again until the cells form a complete organ. In order to produce a complete organism the DNA must be altered in a variety of way to come out with the finished product to be the complete organism." In simple terms, a cell is taken from a donor woman. Then an unfertilized egg is taken from a second woman. The DNA from the cell is removed and transferred to the egg. The egg is then implanted into a surrogate mother. The resulting baby is genetically identical to the original donor.…
- 751 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The last paragraph is good because it acknowledges that more research has occurred since the article was written. I think you need to be more specific about what has happened. Also, I don't think you really do anything to refute the points made by people who are against cloning. Instead you just agree with the author Postrel. Maybe you could write about new developments that prove that those "pundits" are…
- 476 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
"Human Cloning? Don't Just Say No," written by Ruth Macklin, a professor of Bioethics, discusses the negative responses people have regarding human cloning. As the title says: "Human Cloning? Don't Just Say No," Macklin believes that cloning deserves a chance to be developed in humans. Though there may not be any substantial benefits to human cloning, nobody has presented a persuasive case that cloning is harmful either.…
- 532 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Thousands of people each year die because of organ shortages. Cloning human organs can eliminate this epidemic. If organs can be specially made for each individual who needs one, organ transplant waiting lists can be eliminated. “...An average of 18 people die each day waiting for transplants that can 't take place because of the shortage of donated organs”(“The Need Is Real: Data”). These deaths can be prevented by cloning. However, many people believe that cloning is very unethical and goes against religion. This hinders the formation of cloning and holds back scientists from imperative research. The lack of support given by the people for cloning research impedes government and local funding and aid. The delay in funding and aid creates a rift in research. Many people support biomedical technology and cloning, but only to a certain extent. Most religious people are concerned about cloning because they believe that only God has the right to give and take life in any form. In reality, fear and the lack of knowledge inhibit many religious and ethical people from supporting the idea of cloning. “If we hope to direct the course of this powerful technology, we should strive to learn as much as we can about these molecular tools and then let scientists and corporations know our wishes. Only then can we truly expect to avoid the risks and enjoy the…
- 1307 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Human cloning involves many social, moral, and ethical controversies. I would like to state my position: no to human cloning, we have made enough mistakes, and I am personally not ready for such trials of my humanity. Human cloning is perverse, abnormal, unhealthy and unnecessary. It is an unjustifiable waste of human and material resources. I’m glad that the scientists have failed because the less attractive the idea may be to those who want to keep attempting such a thing. Human cloning is a controversial issue that is becoming one of the debatable subjects. I have studied websites to find out what people think of a designer human being. The opinions are divided. Some people are for human cloning as an emotional compensation for our lives' naturally ending in deaths; others are horrified with this unhealthy idea. Why would you want a replicate of someone that might possibly hate you? For example if you mother or father passes away, would you want to replace them with a copy that won’t have the exact feelings he or she felt towards you? Why would you want to replace a loved one in the first place? The idea of death shouldn’t be negative, it’s a way to put the mind and body to rest and at one point we all have to do it. I believe the cloning humans is morally incorrect and in the eyes of religious zealots they’ll will argue that God created man in his own image, and that he is the creator of it all. So why would man challenge God in creating something when he shouldn’t have the ability to do…
- 282 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays