Preview

Argument Readings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
732 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argument Readings
In “Who Are You Animal Rights Activists Anyway?” by Tom Regan, he was telling the general public about the views of animal rights activists. Regan has written several essays on animal rights and is recognized as a key intellectual leader of the animal rights movement and has also written several books on the subject which makes him very credible in his writings. Regan’s argument is one of change, he’s trying to get us to change our views and persuade us that not all animal right activists are extremists. He starts his essay by telling us that “the world will have to change once we learn to treat animals with respect”, he goes on to tell us that “being kind to animals is not enough, avoiding cruelty is not enough and that the truth of animal rights requires empty cages, not larger cages.” I found his essay hard to keep my attention by the way he jumped around. In “Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns” by Molly Ivins, she was telling the reader her thoughts on getting rid of guns. Ivans is a nationally syndicated political writer. Ivans argument is one of position. She gives us her views that she supports the Second Amendment and it stating clearly that “guns are for those who form part of a well-regulated militia” means the armed forces, including the National Guard not fourteen year old boys or wacky religious cults and unregulated citizens. Ivans goes on to state her argument by stating that “a well regulated militia implies both long training and long discipline and that should be required of those who are permitted to have guns, because a gum is literally the power to kill”. This essay kept my attention because it is something that I agree with. In “The Last Word on the Last Breath” by Jan Hoffman, she was telling us her views on the right on who should determine when an ill patient should die. Her argument is one on both change and persuasion. She starts her essay by telling us about a 35 year old patient that had been in a vegetative


Cited: Regan, Tom. "Who Are You Animal Rights Activists Anyway?" Wiener, Harvey S. Major Themes for Modern Writers. Custom Publishing, n.d. Ivins, Molly. "Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns." Weiner, Harvey S. Major Themes for Modern Writers. Custom Publishing, n.d. [ Hoffman, Jan. "The Last Word on the Last Breath." Weiner, Harvey S. Major Themes for Modern Writers. Custom Publishing, n.d. ] Allen, Charlotte. "The Return of the Happy Housewife." Wiener, Harvey S. Major Themes for Modern Writers. Custom Publishing, n.d.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Cruelty Behind Your Ballpark Hot dog is an article published by the Los Angeles Times where author Bruce Friedrich voices his concerns with the inactions of the USDA in response to violations of The Humane Slaughter Act made by major “slaughterhouses” across the country. By using several rhetorical devices, Friedrich voices his opinion on the actions taking place in several abattoirs across the country and his disappointment in the responses to them. I generally disagree with the way Friedrich conveys his opinion; however, I understand and support the morality of his message.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Regan begins the essay by stating that “. . . few people regard the animal rights position as…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Americans that support strict weapon control have achieved the conclusion that this change guarantees the benefit of the states to claim guns. Firearm control laws specifically damage this privilege and accordingly should not be under thought. Regardless of the possibility that the issue is ignored, weapon control advocates express that with a specific end goal to diminish gun related viciousness, firearm control laws must be executed to expel the savagery created by guns. In spite of the fact that this may appear to be sensible, the outcomes of such laws are unexpectedly counterproductive; they worsen the issue as opposed to settling it. Other than the way that the Constitution ensures its residents the privilege to remain battle ready, possibly…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The following argument is in favor of Gun Control. Nowadays, we are living in a society where the access to weapons is becoming easier and more available. The image of armed citizens in public places, on the way to their work centers or walking in the streets, is evolving into in a common stamp. One of the great generators of violence in our country is related to the use and circulation of firearms and ammunition. Guns are responsible for roughly 30,000 deaths a year in America; more than half of those deaths are suicides. Despite those devastating facts, many Americans keep questioning if the restriction of the right to bear arms is a good choice.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the United States, gun laws have been a major source of debate from the time when the US Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787. As the second amendment states “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (need source); many people have contended with the original intention. While this debate is important in society, several amendments have been made towards the guarantee surrounding the official wording of “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (need source).…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On one hand, some people believe that the wording “the right of people to keep and bear arms” creates the constitutional right for individuals to possess firearms. On the other hand, some believe that the use of “a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state” only inhibits Congress from enacting legislation that limits a state’s right to self-defense. Clearly, the Second Amendment does grant citizens the right to bear arms, but many people have began to question this due to the increasing gun violence in the…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, public debates have been less focused on the safety and wellbeing of our youth and kids. Instead, the debate has been heavily focused on the meaning of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the proper use of guns by the adults. The Second Amendment reads, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the American political system, gun control has been a debate for many years; however, recent shootings have forced it into a large spotlight. The problem that splits gun control proponents from their opposition is the language of the second amendment of the constitution. The founding fathers of this nation believed that, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution). This multifaceted sentence from the Bill of Rights brings many quarrels to life with its simple diction. It is very open to interpretation, which is what causes both sides of the debate to have “legal stances” on the matter. The National Rifle Association (NRA), which is the nation’s largest gun advocacy organization, is led by the philosophy that it, “[hosts] a wide range of firearms-related public interest activities of the National Rifle Association of America and other organizations that defend and foster the Second…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The right to bear arms is a Constitutional right that should be upheld, without limitations. The passage of laws to limit gun ownership is just a quick fix to a larger problem. The idea to limiting gun ownership is that it will help reduce catastrophes, like school shootings and innocent bystanders being injured or killed in drive-by shootings. However, limiting gun ownership will not change or modify the mentality of the people that commit these crimes, because when guns are taken away people will just find a new weapon. People and politicians may argue that the second amendment does not target every single Americans when it “protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms (2nd amendment),” but only targets militia or national guards, rather than individuals. However, the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess and carry firearms even if the individual is unconnected with service in a militia. Interpretation of the Second Amendment by scholars, courts and legislators, after its ratification through the late 19th century also supports the Supreme Court’s ruling. Also the majority opinion held that the amendment's reference to “the militia” serves to clarify the reference “the people”, because "the militia” in colonial America consisted of a subset of “the people.” Therefore, the 2nd…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States of America, is admittedly going through many low points and difficulties with the infrastructure of the government. One of the most prevalent controversial issues among the government and its citizens is where the hypothetical “line” is drawn with gun control. Gun control presents itself as a point of valuable authority in the government to some, and also continues to be an enormous problem to others. This argument between the government and its people clash over the matters of possession and confiscation of firearms, the Constitution’s content and the position it takes to back up the issue, what the future holds for gun owners, and if the stricter control of firearms by the government actually reduces the amount of crime…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kistler, John M. People Promoting And People Opposing Animal Rights : In Their Own Words. n.p.: Greenwood Press, 2002. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 30 Oct. 2012.…

    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Extended Essay

    • 2172 Words
    • 8 Pages

    For my Extended Essay, I have chosen to write about how People of the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) use language and imagery to persuade its audience’s beliefs about animal rights.…

    • 2172 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Singer, P. (2003). Animal liberation. New York, N.Y.: New York Review of Books :. (Original work published 1973)…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many rhetorical devices are used in the article, “Factory Farming Ignores the Suffering of Animals.” This article contained many innuendos, euphemism, dysphemism, hyperboles, horse laugh, downplayers, and weaselers. A type of innuendo that is used in this article is that Oliver Broudy asks a good amount of loaded questions to Peter Singer about animal rights. For example, Broudy (2009) asks, “And finally, it turns out that a wood chipper is not the best way to dispose of 10,000 spent hens” (p. 1). This question assumes that spent hens are thrown into the wood chipper. In addition, there is sarcasm in this question. Broudy uses euphemism when asking questions to Singer so Broudy can stay neutral and find out more facts than opinions. However, Singer responds to Broudy's questions with tons of dysphemism to show his passion about his argument. Peter Singer uses many hyperboles to exaggerate the feelings and misery of the hens throughout this article. Horse laugh is present in a few parts of this article when Oliver Broudy asks certain questions to Peter Singer. When Oliver Broudy (2006) asks, “But surely there's a significant difference between a Jew, for instance, and a chicken. These are different orders of beings,” Broudy is downplaying the phrase “order of beings” (p. 1). This article also contains weaselers where Peter Singer states that the hens may or may not eat part of the remnants from the slaughterhouse (Broudy, 2009).…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The amazing thing about literature is that it can be interrupted differently by each person who reads it. Which means that while one piece of writing is amazing, creative, and witty to one person to another person it could be the most boring, uninteresting, and redundant piece of literature they have ever read. In this semester of Literature 221, I was given the opportunity to read works from many different genres, time periods, and styles of writing. Some of which, like Emily Dickinson’s Life I and Life XLIII, Joyce Carol Oates’ Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?, and Sherman Alexie’s What You Pawn I Will Redeem I thoroughly enjoyed and learned from. While others such as Ernest Hemingway’s Big Two-Hearted River, Mark Twain’s excerpt When The Buffalo Climbed a Tree from Roughing It, and the excerpt from Sula by Toni Morrison weren’t exactly my cup of tea.…

    • 2418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics