Preview

Argument Paper on Animal Rights

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2401 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argument Paper on Animal Rights
If you had the choice to live or die which would you choose? If you had the alternative to live in a cage or in a house which would you select? If you had the option to have experiments that caused you pain preformed on you would you? The truth is that most of use would rather live, reside in a house and would not be a part of an experiment that caused us pain. However, most people accept the elements of the above conditions for non-human animals. Non-human animals should not be a part of destruction, pain, incarceration and underprivileged conditions that are caused by humans. Animal right's is a movement of individuals that support giving non-human animals life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. "People who support animal rights believe that animals are not ours to use for food, clothing, entertainment, experimentation, or any other purpose" (PETA, FAQ) This movement is different form animal welfare which is what most individuals are aware of "Animal welfare theories accept that animals have interests but allow those interests to be traded away as long as the human benefits are thought to justify the sacrifice, while animal rights theories say that animals, like humans, have interests that cannot be sacrificed or traded away to benefit others." (PETA, FAQ)
The controversial process of how animals are treated has existed for many generations, up to now we have been unsuccessful in reaching an understanding. Even in religion people have different views "Jainism, which enjoins ahimsa ("noninjury") [sic] toward all living things, and Buddhism, which forbids the needless killing of animals […].traditional Judaism and Christianity taught that animals were created by God for human use,." (Encyclopedia Britannica) There are many different opinions some say that "Animals […] lack this capacity for free moral judgment. They are not beings of a kind capable of exercising or responding to moral claims. Animals therefore have no rights, and they can have none."( Cohen,



Cited: "Alternatives To Animal Testing FAQ" 1997-2005 The Johns Hopkins Center. Animal Rights Subject Guide. Rio Hondo College Library, Whittier, CA 19 July, 2005 http://altweb.jhsph.edu "animal rights." Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. 2005. Encyclopædia Britannica Premium Service 19  July  2005 . "FAQ" PETA  (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) Animal Rights Subject Guide Rio Hondo College Library, Whittier, CA 19 July, 2005http://www.peta.org/ Field, Chris "PETA Kills puppies and Kittens"

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The movement for animal rights, which is also known as animal liberation, is the concept that the basic interests of animals should be regarded with an equal eye as with humans. It promotes the fact that animal should not be treated as public property, traded or be made a part of any business transaction, but they should be treated as legal persons, with their own rights. According to the Utilitarianism view, right is what will promote the greatest possible happiness of the greatest possible number happiness.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    century, thousands of children were dying from polio because there was no vaccine to fight…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The truth is out as we finally get a peek behind the curtain that veils our society. In our world are people who believe they are gods, dictating who or what gets to live or die. Humanity no longer values the planet that sustains us or the organisms that coexist with us. Instead, we poke, prod, and experiment on animals to further our technologies. Often times it comes down to the worth of one creature over another. Our actions are justified by the simple concept of “who you would rather choose to die, a rat or a human?” According to Scholz et al. (2013) testing chemicals on vertebrates is essential to determine environmental hazards and to assess the risks. However, these tests are often considered inappropriate and raise ethical and financial concerns. Animal testing is not only unethical, but it is also unnecessary, unreliable and a waste of money.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would like to counter this with the argument that we have a higher obligation to humans. It has been asserted that ‘speciesism’, or thinking of animals as our lessers is the equivalent to racism or sexism (Andre and Velasquez, 4). I will concede that unwarranted suffering of any form of life should be avoided. In this case, however, it is by no means unwarranted, and animals should not be our primary concern. Animals in anguish is a legitimate issue, but so is the suffering of human beings from diseases and disabilities that could be cured. The majority of our focus must be on the latter. 90 percent of these animals are receiving pain killers; scientists aren’t hardened, unjust, and cruel people as a group. Tales such as the drowning of polar bears used in research extraneous to palpable development are used by activists to support their claims. The majority of people would agree that is an issue that should be stopped, but placing heavy restrictions on animal testing as a whole is not the solution. This would put a gratuitous burden on the productive research reaping benefits previously stated. To put this into perspective, “If we had to choose between saving a drowning baby and saving a drowning rat, we would surely save the baby.” (Andre and Velasquez,…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer states, “Nonhuman animals lack certain capacities that human animals possess, and that this may justify different treatment. But it does not justify giving less consideration to their needs and interests (MacKinnon, 398).” His position has merit which causes one to stand behind the same beliefs as he does and feel that animals should have similar rights that people have because they too feel pain and experience emotions and just…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many individuals believe that animals deserve to be treated ethically. This belief spurred the idea of animal rights – the basic idea that even animals, like humans, have certain inalienable rights that should not be infringed upon. Animal rights groups like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA, are the main advocates for animal rights. The idea of animal rights has been in the modern mindset for centuries – ancient Egyptians treated cats like gods!…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With this statement, I don’t believe in most of the Animal Rights beliefs. However, there are a few statements from the Animal Rights side I believe in. I don’t believe animals should be tested on since they go through extreme pain without proper medical treatment. Humans aren’t tested on without consent, so why should animals be tested on? With the entertainment industry, if the animals are treated well and aren’t put through stressful situations, I believe it is fine to use them. Bull fighting, circuses, cock…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal rights protect species from mistreatment by humans. The advocates of this regulation demand that the government establish more laws governing the rights for animals because of their empathy toward animals, similarities to human behavior, moral status, and biomedical research. They mandate equal rights to all species; however, I believe the existing laws are adequate and should not be expanded, but enforced and have minor changes.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This theory is derived from the undisputed fact that human beings are capable of feeling pain, because the body has a nervous system. When nerve cells are destroyed by say, a sharp blade, the brain receives messages that trigger in the consciousness as pain- the more cells that are destroyed at once, the sharper and more unbearable the pain. The nervous systems in most animals, especially mammals, are almost identical to those in human beings, suggesting that animals can feel pain the same way people do. Therefore, if people have no right to cause pain in other people, they have no right to cause pain in animals. Also, there is scientific evidence stating that most animals have emotions, are susceptible to mental stress, and are affected by some of the same things that affect humans emotionally. In a study conducted by Johns Hopkins University in 1997, children of almost every species of mammal down to the smallest rodent suffered and died soon after being untimely separated from their mothers- despite adequate care from scientists. Animals confined in cages for very long periods of time, such as those on farms and those in scientific laboratories, show signs of insanity and neuroticism, often throwing themselves against the walls or tearing flesh from their own bodies in crazed, desperate fits. The obvious signs that animals are like humans in their ability to feel pain and joy, demand that they be granted their inalienable rights against murder, torture, and imprisonment. The only things that stand in the way for animal rights are money and human convenience. Most people do not consider animals worthy of any rights because they are not human, and humans are somehow better, though that is no excuse for cruel treatment. It used to be considered acceptable to enslave Africans because they were not white, and the German people…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When God created man, he also created other living creatures and every living creature has their own right to be on this planet. However , we humans being the superior in power and thoughts, somehow forget these things most of the time. Some people think that animals do deserve the rights as we humans to live; while other thinks that they are more for food and medical research.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cartoon, The Battalion, is an argument showing a member of Peta with a sign defending animal rights. This marketing campaign is targeting those individuals not supportive of animal rights. The artist used a member of Peta with a picket sign and a couple animals in the background design to appeal to the emotions of the audience. A rabbit holding a sign that reads, “I’m with stupid”, suggest that animals are sentient beings.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to animals and their rights, there is a definite line between our needs and our taking advantage of those species that we consider inferior. As long as man has existed he has been carnivorous, and the same holds true for many other species of animals. Animals are a necessity to humans for survival, whether it be for food, clothing, etc. However, the unnecessary torture of animals through testing is not a necessity for human survival. When it comes to the needless torture of animals that we claim to benefit, the animals lives need to be taken into consideration. To start with, animals are not capable of giving their consent to be used as subjects in an experiment. Secondly, experiments can only be performed on an individual who is willing, morally speaking. Therefore it is immoral to use animals in experiments. It would be great if this were a world where our lives were actually governed by morals. The sad truth is that we do not. Until we do, someone is going to have to stand up for the silent majority that is incapable of voicing its opinion. When there is torture and unjust treatment towards humans, people then realize that it is wrong. When it comes to needlessly conducting experiments on animals, no one ever says anything. Humans need to stop thinking about themselves as a superior species to other animals. They have to start thinking about how we can stop the cruelty that they inflict upon animals day after day in experiment after experiment. Tom Regan, a well-known animal rights activist, wrote, "the fundamental wrong is the system that allows us to view animals as our resources, here for us- to be eaten, or surgically manipulated, or exploited for our own purposes." Using Animals for testing is wrong and should be banned. They should be entitled to the rights we have. Every day humans are using defenseless animals for cruel and most often useless tests. The animals cannot fight for themselves therefore we must.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal rights and animal welfare fall at different points on a continuum that runs from animal liberation at one end to animal exploitation at the other. The animal rights viewpoint can be defined as the belief that humans do not have the right to use animals for their own gainin the laboratory, on the farm, in entertainment or in the wild. The degree to which humans may benefit from any use of nonhuman animals is irrelevant to determine how animals should be treated. The animal welfare viewpoint advocates the humane use of animals which involves maintaining animal well-being and prohibiting unnecessary cruelty. Many distinctions can be made within these terms but both connote a concern for the suffering of others.…

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nowadays, animals are not thought of as a significant part of society such as human beings. This is an unfair outlook of the rights in today’s world. Animals do not have many rights but they do have some anti-cruelty statutes which are valid in just about every state (Dudley 16) such statutes include an offense for knowingly torturing or overworking an animal, failing to provide proper food or shelter, making animals fight one another, and using animals as bait or lure. Another includes poisoning an animal except farm animals, which means by law; farm animals are not protected from the grueling…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Rights

    • 1132 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Do non-human animals have rights? Animal rights debates are incredibly controversial. Animal rights activists argue for animal’s rights whereas others argue that animals have no rights. Animals have many rights, which is why there are laws set in place to protect animals. Animals have rights to protect themselves from animal cruelty. When taking into consideration animal rights, humans need to consider animal rights laws, animal abuse (using animals as food and testing), animal rights support groups, and animal cruelty stories.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays