Preview

Argument on the Land Ethic & Tragedy of the Commons

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1137 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argument on the Land Ethic & Tragedy of the Commons
While Leopold discusses The Land Ethic as a community concept as if land is a living-breathing thing, one must remember the natural human behavior of selfishness. He mentioned the community concept of sounding simple when he states “The land ethic simply enlarges the boundaries of the community to include soils, waters, plants, and animals, or collectively: the land.” (2) He continues “This sounds simple: do we not already sing out love for and the obligation to the land of the free and the home of the brave? Yes, but just what and whom do we love?” (2) While we do not love the “actual land or soil”, we love the values of our country, the United States of America. In The Land Ethic, Leopold attempts to explain why people are so selfish in the use of their land. Throughout history, people have been ruthlessly fighting each other for control of the most land possible, including forests, beaches, plains, fields, mountains and so on. But what for? Certainly not to help make use of it to serve the community, or the greater good or the future for that matter. Instead, it is essentially squeezed for all its worth, by people who are only interested in fossil fuels and depleting resources among other things, all without regard to harming the environment, all in the name of big business. To combat the self centered needs of individuals and corporations alike, we must not forget that the government provides subsidies and regulations on land use. Leopold continues “when a private landowner is asked to perform some unprofitable act for the good of the community, he only assents with an outstretched palm.” (7)

He concludes that an economically self-interest society is lopsided and when relegated to government it becomes too complex. He feels that private owners need to be ethically logical to the land. In The Tragedy of the Commons, Hardin talks about the consequences of our selfish nature and attempts to find a technical solution to the land ethnic. He

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Never has a man left the embrace of nature once he found himself enamored by it; this infatuation is found in both John Muir’s and Aldo Leopold’s writing, a sense of wanting to protect this deity they call Mother Nature, a moral and ethical responsibility which every human being has to this Mother. Both John Muir and Aldo Leopold recount their almost romantic encounter with Mother Nature in their books Our National Parks and A Sand County Almanac, respectively. However, in both books it is notable that each man carries instilled in the very fiber of their being a sense of dissatisfaction toward the process of mechanization and industrialization; processes which unfortunately…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The land ethic In Leopold’s view, humans see themselves as conquerors of the environment, and this is the key fault we all begin with in achieving this symbiosis with nature. This can be referred to as the conqueror role- we think we know what makes a community “tick.” We think we can manage it, and be “kings” of the land. But we don’t know as much as we think we do. He persists there is an instrumental value to nature, and this is one of the reasons we have no choice but to preserve it, we cannot survive as a species without its resources.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Colonial Pipeline Tragedy

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In an essay in 1833, William Forster Lloyd outlined a phenomenon called the “tragedy of the commons.” The tragedy of the commons can be defined as individuals acting only for their personal benefit, thus depleting a necessary group resource to the point that it cannot recover (“Tragedy”). This issue reared its head in the state of North Carolina recently due to the gas shortage caused by a damaged pipeline.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading “The Land Ethic” by Aldo Leopold I found that his research and understanding of land ethics is very thorough and he makes valid points that should be read by everyone in our society. He gives a different outlook on land that makes sense and creates a vivid image of the way that we as human should view land. He describes land as not just soil that lies beneath our feet or below the plants that we walk on, cut, or eat, but as the first layer in a community of which each piece is dependent on one another. If one piece of the community were to fall or not do what it is intended, it would in turn make it difficult for the rest of the community the thrive as it should. When thinking of land it makes it easier if it is thought of as…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The tragedy of commons is when people share a common resource they tend to deplete is because of self-interest and for a short term profit.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor, Hardin describes the wealthy population of the world as being in a single lifeboat that is almost filled until buckling while the poor population of the world treads water below. Hardin’s essay gets his readers to feel the natural instinct to survive. The lifeboat metaphor that Hardin uses relieves the wealthy population of their moral obligations to the less fortunate, but in addition, puts all of the blame and cause of the depletion of earth’s resources on the poor. As much as his argument may make sense, there are some flaws in his way of thinking. Alan Durning, who noticed that major flaws with Hardin’s essay, wrote on what he thought about the topic that Hardin has brought to his attention. In Durning’s essay, Asking How Much Is Enough, he argues that it is not overpopulation that is depleting the earth’s resources, but overconsumption of the resources by the wealthy population. The arguments in Durning’s essay makes the reader realize that the way Hardin uses the metaphorical lifeboat to persuade his readers into thinking the same thing as he does and shows that Hardin wrongly places the blame of all of earth’s financial stability problems on the poorer population.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aldo Leopold’s ethics are not only displayed through the book only in past tense, but also apply in a similar way to our ethics today. An author such as Aldo Leopold doesn’t just try to explain what he sees in nature and his surroundings but also tries to send a message to influence the readers. In A Sand County Almanac, Leopold tries to explain and help readers better understand through examples and his own experiences, the importance of our ethics and conservation.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abbey goes on to name several large businesses and universities and charges them with “looting” these public lands, and compares their behavior to that of “gangsters.” His tone in this essay is harsh and accusatory, continuing to name several politicians who in his words would, “sell the graves of their mothers if there’s a quick buck in the deal.” Attacking the integrity of these men based on this opinion alone, and not directly addressing their stance on preserving our ecosystem, is an example of ad hominem, yet another logical fallacy that discredits his arguments. His claim that any person who goes into a field and begins drilling is committing a crime against the human race is barbaric. Human kind has evolved, and our tools and equipment have evolved as well, but the fact that some people make their living by using what is naturally available through plants and animals and even…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The philosophical tragedy of the commons occurs when individuals overuse (for their personal benefit) the commons to the point where it impedes on the use and future use of others and future generations. This overuse also leads to devaluation. Hardin proposed an analogy of a field “open to all,” in which common ownership leads to environmental degradation. In terms of pollution, the problem of the commons deals with adding to the commons rather than taking from the commons.…

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grapes Of Wrath Analysis

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the early chapters of the Grapes of Wrath, John Steinback wasted no time in describing in which way humans can provide for one another. Jim Casey had been roaming the farm lands for quite sometime, a-thinkin’ an’ a-wonderin’ about humans and God. However, over the years he had grown lonely. He…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Garrett Hardin’s essay “The Tragedy of the Commons” is a paper on the logical outcome of rational self interest. Rational self interest is what any person weighing their options would do to gain the most benefit. An example from the text is given about herdsmen. A herdsman would first increase his herd, disregarding the effect the increase number would have on the field the herd grazed on, to increase his profit. Hardin demonstrates that eventually, with every herdsmen acting in this way, the field that is grazed on…

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Sand County Almanac

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most of Leopold’s arguments were in my opinion good arguments. In the third part, Leopold brings to my attention the obvious ironies of conservation. To promote the appreciation of wildlife and gain political support, one encourages recreational usage of wilderness. That same recreational use destroys the very environment that you would be trying to conserve. Leopold talks about how people want to take a trophy from the wilderness to share or always remember their experience. He says that just being there is a trophy enough. I love to hunt and I love to widdle wood. In Leopold’s eyes I would be taking trophies. He goes into such detail describing small creatures; that I usually would shoot for fun, but he really opened my eyes to how just the slightest change can affect so much in an ecosystem that I think twice.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aldo Leopold presents many interesting aspects regarding ecology and conservation within his writing of the Land Ethic, Round River, and “Think like a Mountain”. One statement that stood out among the rest was “Harmony with land is like harmony with a friend; you cannot cherish the right hand and chop off his left". The land is much like the human body—if one part is damaged or sick, the effects can be witnessed elsewhere. Like a cancer that attacks the cells, the effect of pollution, overhunting, and over farming can spread far beyond the site of initial damage. Further, Leopold points out the flaws of solving the conservation dilemma. So little is known about the environment and how it functions, and how each part makes such an impact on other seemingly unrelated parts. We cannot go about tinkering and toying with different aspects and take out species of plants and animals assuming that they will not impact the overall health of the surroundings. No matter how small, each element impacts that around in one way or another. It may provide nourishment, its decay may enrich the soil, or it may provide a vital service to another species. Again like a human body, removing a species is like removing an organ or a gland. We may be able to live without it, but something will be changed, a scar will remain, and the overall being will be weakened. Leopold points out that we have yet to think in terms of the seemingly unimportant pieces and only focus on those species and habitats in which we see value and beauty. We spend time preserving the species that are economically valuable to the population and don’t worry about the ones that are costing us economically. Like the wolves in “Think like a Mountain,” species causing economic damage (through things like slow growth, crop damage, or killing of livestock) are viewed as more expendable, less important pieces in the puzzle. We must have some responsibility for those species as well because they provide vital services to…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    5. Gowdy, J (ed.), Limited Wants, Unlimited Means: a reader on hunter-gatherer economics and the environment (Island Press : US : 1997)…

    • 3271 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his work, Tragedy of the Commons, Garrett Hardin address a section termed Tragedy of Freedom in a Commons.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics