Preview

Are Ceo's Overpaid?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
905 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Are Ceo's Overpaid?
Steve Marshall

Are American corporate CEO's overpaid?

I believe that CEO’s are paid to much because it does not seem to matter just how well the company does while they are running it they still seem to make a ridiculous amount of money. This is wrong because they are supposed to be paid according to how well that the company does but even when it does poorly they are still paid exceedingly well. While this is not a surprise on top of being paid exceedingly well they are also given stock options which essentially increase there earnings even more. It used to be that the lowest paid employee in the company earned one tenth of the CEO. Now CEOs expect to earn at least 100 times as much as the lowest employee. The average pay of company CEO's was almost 13 million in 2011. CEOs do not produce anything and, if their value were compensated by how well the company did under their leadership, they often would get pay cuts. If every company looks through their top leadership, pay difference is ridiculous. It is the way it is because corporate America rules the country. If you have political connections and/or client connection and you can bring tons of new business then you can be CEO any day. Now if you start your own business - you can be CEO from day one (don't require a special talent) just common business sense. Base salaries of corporate CEO's should be on par with federal job grades just like for other employees. If they bring in all this money solely because of there new million dollar business and make profit out of it. They get a fix cut of it for that year. Paying CEO's 100x, 300x, 500x more money then the rest is basically saying rest of the employees are suckers, looser and bottom feeders. Its a shame.
CEO's have become merely managers, or caretakers of their shareholders’ property. Yet they, inexplicably, are compensated as if they were visionaries. This is wrong. This is what the Occupy Wall Street crowd should be railing against. Though, I can’t

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    I do not think that payment based solely on similar salaries in the industry is fair. I believe that executive pay should be based on experience and performance on an individual. The size and financial strength of the company should also be considered.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because much of this gross compensation is tied to the performance of the company and the company’s stock, the CEOs’ chase after the rainbow brings benefits that spillover to many. And while CEO compensation can often seem obscene, at least there is tangible productivity, in contrast to the spoiled celebrity or government-lobbying lawyer or the regulation-skirting financier. Regardless, the essential question is what has each of us done with the talents and resources God has entrusted to us?” (Stapleford, 2009, p. 136).…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Is it ethical for CEO’s and upper management to accept large pay increases when their company’s profitability is declining and/or the company is facing bankruptcy?…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The average Fortune 500 CEO in the United States makes more than $12 million per year, which is nearly five million dollars more than the amount for top CEOs in Switzerland, where the second highest paid CEOs live, more than twice that for those in Germany, where the third highest paid CEOs live, and more than…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 5

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think that it is dissappointing when it comes to how much an executive managers' salary is versus what the average employees' salary is. I get that some people should be paid well if they are the owners of the company or if they are the person that has developed the company but other than that I feel that the executives' pay should be in some what comparison as an average employee. I feel that it is the regular employees are the ones that keep the executives to be paid what they are being paid. I think that the average employees are the ones that do all of the hard work to keep the executives on top. The text states "The social groups contend that the increasein compensation recieved by the U.S. executives are far out of line with those provided to the remainder of the workforce. To substantiate their claim of pay injustice, they note that in the 1990's the CEO's of large companies recieved a 36% raise in compensation, whereas white-collar workers had a 3.9% raise, and blue-collar workers recieved a 2.47% raise. The AFL-CIO stated that a worker making $25,000/year in 1994 would in 1999 be recieving annual pay of $138,350 if his or her pay would have increased at the same rate as that of the average CEO" (Henderson, 2006). This to me is crazy. It is crazy that if the average worker was to actually get that kind of a raise. Could you imagine getting that great of a raise each year? I know I sure could not imagine getting a 36% raise each year. I think that knowing that the executives make a substancial amount of money more than the average worker can sometimes bringe down the morale of the employees. "Those that are defending the compensation of the U.S. executives focus their defenses on the continuous rise in the success and the worth of the U.S. corporations.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    www.epi.org - a non-profit, non-partisan think tank focused on giving voice to the needs of low- and middle-income…

    • 3280 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pummeled by the bind of a painful recession and furious over oversized executive compensation packages at the very Wall Street firms widely blamed for the economic chaos, they gradually distrust key establishments and individual leaders. Americans are angered at the financial services region. They believe that these institutions have rigged the game so that top level executives are rewarded substantially even when they fail. Americans want action to restore fairness to the system and get pay back in line. The variety of experts and activists of political leaders and ordinary citizens, there is a belief that executive incentives have exaggerated short-term perfor¬mance, supported unnecessary risk-taking, and failed to discipline poor performance. Many believe that incentive plans have tempted some CEOs to put personal financial interests in front of good stewardship that provides the long-term interests of their organizations (Ethics Resource Center,…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    They feel like they have no power. They feel like they deserve the pay they are getting from their job. While CEOs are making millions of dollars for running a company. Many of these CEO don’t need to work at all, but they make millions. People who are the “working poor “according to Reich feel like these CEOs are “worth” their pay.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an article published in The Washington Post, Roberto A. Ferdman states that a study by Harvard Business School found that CEOs make over 350 times the amount of an average worker (Ferdman). That is more than twice the amount of Switzerland, the country with the second largest CEO-to-worker pay gap, coming in at 148 to 1 (Ferdman). “What Americans share with the rest of the world is a collective disdain for pay inequality” says Ferdman, “People of all ages, education levels, and income brackets, the study found, believe that low-skilled workers are getting paid too little and high-skilled workers are getting paid too much” (Ferdman).…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A proper pay ratio is one that is fair. I cannot accurately put a number to a proper pay ratio, but a CEO should understand that of the entire company is making money, then he makes money too. A person making a minimum wage can afford the bare necessities, and a slight bump can help the employee afford more, inadvertently helping the economy. A CEO making 25 times that of the employee would only use that bump for indulgences.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wages for the working class have remained nearly stagnant since the late 1970’s. Worker productivity has increased roughly 74% and wages have risen only 9.6%. Income inequality affects the majority of the working class. I have noticed more and more people discussing a guaranteed “Basic” income for all Americans. If you had $1000 given to you every month, you would be free to pursue an education or whatever your heart desired. Our freedom to pursue employment, education or not working at all is one of the guarantees of our Constitution. If CEO’s pay is too high, how do you propose to reduce it? I would tie any compensation for CEO’s to an increase in profits and customer satisfaction surveys.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “It is precisely this fiction-that the singular and primary purpose of the firm is to create value (in the form of a rising stock price) for its shareholders, who are problematically conceptualized as “the owners” - that has allowed corporate America to be shorn from? its job-creating potential and commitment to employment and other stakeholders and to be mined as a collection of financial assets for elite and private gain” (Ho 2). This argument by Ho brings up many points. Over the last few decades, companies have come under more pressure to deliver quarterly results that are pleasing to investors. In placating investors, however, employees can get hurt. When inflation rises or a company must cut costs, companies typically fire employees. CEOs are incentivized to appease Wall Street because they benefit from a rise in their company’s stocks, and their fiduciary duty pushes them to generate returns. They aren’t rewarded for retaining employees even if it is morally right, and management is far more concerned about the company’s performance than the economy’s performance. Also, poor people often do not own stocks. Even with the rallying of the market with Trump’s win in the polls, Trump’s base likely did not benefit much. Wealthy people are more likely to own stocks than poor people. Trump’s wealthy supporters enjoyed lower taxes and higher stock prices.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Are Athletes Overpaid?

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Wouldn’t it be great to make over $100,000,000 a year? Michael Vick and other sports stars think so. But is that really a reasonable amount to be paying someone? These contracts are absolutely unequivocally unreasonable in comparison to the salaries of regular working people who contribute to our society more than an athlete ever will. Teachers are the most important part of our economies future as they are preparing our youth to step out and take on the world. These teachers are the backbone of our future society and yet our government does not give them enough money. Mihir Bhagat says, “the most important man in our nation, the president, who makes critical decisions that affect the entire world every day, only makes $400,000 a year. While President Obama is hard at work reviving the economy, the unproven rookie in the MLB is earning way over that figure.”…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First and foremost, let us take a look at the blessed few that constitute the .01%, .1% or even the 1% in American society. The majority of these individuals are the top corporate officials of multi-national, multi-billion dollar companies, such as General Motors, General Electric, MasterCard, Bank of America, American Express, and International Business Machines to name a few. During the last several decades, executive compensation has reached scandalous levels at certain corporations. Originally, during the 1950s and 1960s, the pay of top executives remained steady with an increase of less than 1% annually, according to economists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. However, over the next three decades, the earnings of the top 1% increased threefold (Inequality). According to a study done by the Congressional Budget Office, “after adjusting for inflation, the after-tax income of the top 1% jumped 139% from 1979 to 2001, whereas the income of the middle fifth rose by just 17%, to $43,700, and the income of the poorest fifth rose…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The salaries for the top people in businesses like CEO 's and chief executive 's in Japan get paid a small amount compared to the top employees in the United States of America. According to the economist.com blogs, in 2010, “Nissan 's boss, Ccarlos Ghosn, earned around $9.5m last year-- on hundred times the pay of Masamoto Yashiro, the departing boss of Shinsei Bank, who took home just $95,000. Sir Howard Stringer of Sony received more than $8m if stock options are included. His counterpart at Panasonic earned a modest $1.2m. Takeda Pharmaceutical paid its America-based global sales chief $6m, twice as much as its chief executive back in Japan.” That to me sounds fishy, in that they can get paid THAT much more than others in their same positions, why can 't they pay for more employees or for their grunts to have a higher ay raise to be able to live without working two jobs.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays