Preview

Arbitration Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1582 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arbitration Law
Arbitration is a form of alternate dispute resolution, and is an informal proceeding which, as it pertains to administrative agency law, is the preferred method of conflict resolution. It occurs outside the courts and is presided over by an arbitrator, or unbiased third party. It is a settlement technique in which the arbitrator reviews the case and imposes a decision that is legally binding
When parties are unable to negotiate an agreement, they enter into arbitration. Arbitration can be voluntary and involuntary, and the decisions are binding. In a voluntary arbitration hearing, the parties agree on procedures that may be formal or informal discussions, negotiations, hearings, or the options of trial-like discovery and sworn witnesses. In mandatory arbitration, the agency imposes the procedures on the parties and the resultant resolution. (1)
It is not known exactly when formal non-judicial arbitration first began but it can be said with some certainty that arbitration, as a way of resolving disputes predates formal courts. Records from ancient Egypt attest to its use especially with high priests and their interaction with the public. Arbitration was popular both in ancient Greece and in Rome.
Under English law, the first law on arbitration was the Arbitration Act 1697, but when it was passed arbitration was already common. The first recorded judicial decision relating to arbitration was in England in 1610. The noted Elizabethan English legal scholar Sir Edward Coke refers to an earlier decision dating from the reign of Edward IV (which ended in 1483). Early arbitrations at common law suffered from the fatal weakness that either party to the dispute could withdraw the arbitrator's mandate right up until the delivery of the award if things appeared to be going against them (this was rectified in the 1697 Act).
The Jay Treaty of 1794 between Britain and the United States sent unresolved issues regarding debts and boundaries to arbitration, which took 7

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The arbitrator decides the rules, weighs the facts and arguments of both parties, and then decides the dispute. Arbitration may be voluntary or mandatory. ( naca.net)…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ISSUE: Hooters management filed a lawsuit to compel Phillips to arbitrate a sexual claim that she threatened to take to court. According to Arbitration Act 9 U. S. C. §4, Phillips signed an agreement showing her acceptance to resolve all employment-related disagreement through arbitration. Should the courts compel Annette Phillips to consider arbitration?…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arbitration is a relatively fast way to arrive upon a decision when two parties are in a dispute. Arbitration has definite benefits such as being flexible and not as formal as a traditional courthouse. Usually, arbitration can be scheduled quicker and with less working parts than a trial. In rare instances, if all parties involved come to an agreement, arbitrators can sometimes create rulings that judges are not allowed to decide. In arbitration, both sides present all evidence to an arbitrator in efforts to prove each side’s case. The arbitrator reaches a final verdict and decides whom the winners and losers are. An arbitrator does the job that a traditional judge or jury would normally do in court if the matter escalated to that point (Hill…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mgt441 Assignment 4

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Arbitration is a quasi-judicial process in which parties agree to submit unresolved disputes to a neutral third party for binding settlement”(Fossum, 2015, p. 509). The topics of arbitration are the interest and rights of each party. Understanding the contract or the terms of the contract seems to always be a subject when arbitration is involved. One party views a matter one way while another understands it another. Both mediation and arbitration have the same goal at hand, to bring a settlement to the disruptive…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In general, U.S. courts have long favored enforcement of arbitration awards. As the Second Circuit noted in Diapulse Corp. of America v. Carba, Ltd. 37 a case decided under the Federal Arbitration Act, [t]he purpose of arbitration is to permit a relatively quick and inexpensive resolution of contractual disputes by avoiding the expense and delay of extended court proceedings.... Accordingly, it is a well-settled proposition that judicial review of an arbitration award should be, and is, very narrowly limited. 38 As another court has expressed this view, "[lt is not the function of a district court to review the record of an arbitration proceeding for mere errors of law or fact."'39 These public policy concerns apply with even greater strength…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Whereas both parties have agreed to enter the Alternative Dispute Resolution process, the process of Non-binding mediation will be administered by a neutral third party.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    - In 1904 the Australian parliament established the commonwealth court of conciliation and arbitration to conciliate and if, that failed arbitrate between unionists and employers in dispute.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mediators do not give a final verdict on the case, but only serve as a resource of understanding between both parties. In the case that there is not an agreement, the parties can look to other avenues to resolve the legal issue, whether that be another ADR option, or court. In the same manner, Arbitration also uses a third party to handle disputes. When each party agrees to arbitration, usually an expert in the field is called to facilitate the process. Their responsibility is to listen to what each side has to present, and based on the evidence and information, provide a verdict for the case. Some of these cases can be binding meaning that a decision made by the arbitrator is final. In any other instances, if the case is not binding, then either party has the right to go to court if the verdict is not satisfactory (Arbitration and mediation, n.d.). Sometimes I hybrid version of these two processes, known as Med-Arb, may be the best approach. At the beginning of the process a mediator is established, but if an agreement cannot be reached through mediation, then the mediator takes position as an arbitrator and imposes a binding decision for…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Jay Treaty – Ended all tension between Britain and America, and formed a trade agreement among the two countries for ten years.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    arbitration

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Luna case that involved the companies DGG and Global Service, DGG was trying to receive payment for trademark infringement of a pen that Global Service was currently producing. In the negotiation, Erika did not have a very strong BATNA, which was getting another company to manufacture the Luna pen after a potential lawsuit that would likely only force Global Service to cease production. DGG's interest was simply to receive money for the use of the trademark because they had no intentions of resuming the Luna pen part of their business but still wanted the payment for its use or a potential partnership that would benefit both parties. However, Global Service's interest was simply to keep manufacturing and distributing the Luna pen as it represented 25% of the company's revenue. If Global Service could not negotiate with DGG and possibly be forced to stop producing the pen in a lawsuit, Global Service would have only one BATNA, which is to find another pen to manufacture instead of the Luna pen.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Roman Calendars

    • 4165 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The first time was during and after the Second Punic War. It led to the reform of the Lex Acilia in 191 BC. The details of this reform are unclear, but it appears to have successfully regulated intercalation for over a century.…

    • 4165 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States, a traditional litigation refers to the process of bringing, defending and maintaining a lawsuit (Cheeseman, 2010). Traditional litigation goes through a structured process of answer, discovery trial and jury. Whereas the nontraditional litigation process, alternative dispute resolution, known as ADR is a more flexible, less expensive, not as time consuming, and confidential process. There are several forms of alternative dispute resolution, mediation, arbitration, negotiation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding and utilizing a judicial referee. Arbitration and mediation are similar to where it is a form of negotiation and a neutral party settles the dispute. Negotiation is where the two parties negotiate to settle the dispute. A mini-trial is a shortened version of a traditional litigation trial. Fact-finding situations call for the parties to employ a third party to investigate the facts to come to a resolution. Lastly, a judicial referee is much like a mini-trial but both parties reserve the right to appeal. Ninety percent of cases are resolved through alternative dispute resolution (Harms, 2011). The next several paragraphs will identify risks associated with traditional litigation and the advantages of the alternative dispute resolution in reducing those risks.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arbitration is a simplified version of a trial involving limited discovery and simplified rules of evidence. The arbitration is headed and decided by an arbitral panel. To comprise a panel, either both sides agree on one arbitrator, or each side selects one arbitrator and the two arbitrators elect the third. Arbitration hearings usually last between a few days to a week, and the panel only meets for a few hours per day. The panel then deliberates and issues a written decision, or arbitral award. Opinions are not public record. Arbitration has long been used in labor, construction, and securities…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ENV320Final

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Briefly describe two alternatives to civil litigation indicating how they are used (one sentence for each alternative). Mediation allows two parties in to utilize a neutral third party to resolve their dispute. Arbitration is a little like court and mediation because again a neutral third party is used, but this time the third party makes a ruling on the case that is upheld by the court.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics