Response Paper #3 In Thomas Aquinas’s On Law, Morality, and Politics, Aquinas agrees completely with Aristotle’s notion of natural law. Like Aristotle, he believes that everything has a purpose, which is determined and fulfilled by natural law. However, he makes a very clear contradiction to Aristotle’s beliefs when it comes to the issue of what the purpose of justice is. Aristotle believes that justice is the presence of all virtue, while Thomas believes that Justice is one thing on its own, he believes that it is specifically the virtue of a good citizen. This idea is one that Aristotle could not have understood, because in his time, being a good citizen is all that really mattered to people, there was no distinction between a good person and a good citizen. However, in the context of modern thought, Aquinas’s idea makes much more sense. To be a good citizen is clearly one virtue all on its own, because it is entirely possible to be a good citizen that obeys all laws but still be a bad person despite this. Likewise, someone can be a less than perfect citizen but still be in general a good person, which Aristotle would not have grasped. If someone does not pay their taxes, drives without a license, and does not vote, but donates to charity, goes out of their way to help people, and volunteers at homeless shelters, Aristotle would not say that they are a good person, but Thomas would say that they just do not have the virtue of being a good citizen, but they are otherwise good. Aquinas’s idea is one that makes much more sense in modernity. Thomas says that the virtue of a good citizen is justice in general, which directs one toward the common good, therefore, justice in general is different from virtue in general, which means that it’s entirely possible to have one without the other.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Aristotle’s definition of virtue has been modified multiple times throughout book two; however, by (1107a) he comes to a true definition of virtue. Aristotle refers to virtue as what enables a person to live a truly happy life. Virtues work in accordance with the soul to enable people to make the right decisions about how to act in the given circumstances. According to Aristotle’s definition of virtue in (1107a-1107a30) “Virtue is an active condition that makes one apt at choosing, consisting in a mean condition in relation to us, which is determined by a proportion and by the means by which a person with practical judgment would determine it. It is a mean condition between two vices.”…
- 657 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Aquinas developed the Natural law Theory, with which he proposed five ‘telos’ that he believed were our duty to follow. His 5 primary precepts- ‘Worship God Ordered society, Reproduction, Learning and Defend the innocent’ are deontological. However, whilst being deontological, Natural Law does have some flexibility with the more teleological, secondary precepts.…
- 1013 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Aristotle accepts the individual choices and experiences of people and was more concerned with virtue ethics. He doesn't have an idea of free will. Along with Socrates, Aristotle believes that someone may know what the best outcome is and still do wrong, but draws the line between happiness and moral virtue. This includes depression and unhappiness. The world has moral meaning. He explains that moral virtue does not mean the end of life. His theory is that happiness is the end of life, which comes together with reason. Virtue is a state of personality that has to do with someone’s choice.…
- 101 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The original concept of Natural law was thought of by Aristotle and was then adapted by Thomas Aquinas to fit the teachings and views of the Roman Catholic Church. Who was concerned with moral law of how human beings should behave .It is understood by reflecting on human nature and by rationally working what will lead to fulfilling your purpose. According to natural law “good” can only be achieved when the subject has fulfilled its end purpose, the end purpose of human beings is to be rational and achieve Eudemonia. Eudemonia is human flourishing, when they achieve happiness. Aquinas also believed natural law was in everyone, so everyone is good. Human’s unconsciously aim for perfection, to avoid evil and aim for god. Because we are made in god’s image, we are unable to knowingly go for evil. As Animals and humans share desires and wishes it’s only the ability to be rational that separates the human beings from the beasts. Aquinas also believed that the only way to discover divine design in nature, would be through human reason. The divine design was created to the essence/the idea before its actual existence. So the only way reason discovers what is right, is by interpreting nature.…
- 1069 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Aristotle’s argument in virtue ethics is based on an appeal to the notion of an objective account of “the good” for human beings and happiness. “The good” is so important that every good soul takes it as the end. On the other hand, it is also so hard to grasp what are “the good”, so that people seem to be able to intuitively feel it exists but cannot establish a solid belief in it. If one does not know what are “good”, then naturally they will not be able to identify other things that have goodness.…
- 96 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
As a theologian, Aquinas believes the supreme good derives from the eternal God, rather than a worldview good. The Natural Law theory is central to his work because it connects Aristotle’s argument and harmonizes it with the Church teachings. Unlike Aristotle, Aquinas believed the city was a mean to reach the ultimate end, which is God’s will. In his broad conception of explaining laws human beings should obey, the most virtuous ones are derived from God, not from man. He articulates the principle of obedience and how each person is obligated to perform their duties to society. This also is a slight critic from Aristotle’s teaching. Aquinas stressed the significance of duties, rather than performing deeds. Even though both words are relative to preserving and protecting the city, the teaching of obligations solidity the expectations of moral…
- 1535 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Once the assertion is made that God is everything, Aquinas explains his feelings on natural law, which is derived from eternal law. Aquinas believed natural law is the human conscience which is controlled by reason telling us what is right and wrong. However, Aquinas also believes that the supernatural world was of the highest importance to man and if a person is commanded by God, it is not a violation of natural law. He believed that there were three distinct types of law given to us by Him: divine/eternal law, natural law, and positive/human law. He felt that these laws should be obeyed in that…
- 1307 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
| Aristotle claims, relates to lawfulness. Judges exercise corrective justice when they punish criminals, award damages……
- 811 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Aristotle bases his idea of just and unjust law on society’s understanding of why the law exists. Ideal democracy, as we discussed in class, consists of citizens in a society being almost completely informed, educated, and involved in politics and the lawmaking process. As also stated, Democracy can pose a problem to leaders, since the public is knowledgeable. The ignorant are easier to manipulate and hide unjust law from, like in Martin Luther King, Jr’s current segregated society.…
- 619 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
A married couple, both addicted to drugs, is unable to care for their infant daughter. She is taken from them by court order and placed in a foster home. The years passed. She comes to regard her foster parents as her real parents. They love her as they would their own daughter. When the child is 9 years old, the natural parents, rehabilitated from drugs, begin court action to regain custody. The case is decided in their favor. The child is returned to them, against her will. Do ethics support the law in this case? Discuss.…
- 834 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The virtue of justice is “to establish the parts of the soul in a relation of mastering, and being mastered by, one another that is according to nature, while to produce injustice is to establish a relation of ruling, and being ruled by” . Justice is a virtue contained in the soul, and a soul that is deprived of justice is deprived of excellence. Justice is necessary in a ruling society if flourishing is sought, but it needs to be done in moderation and on a fair…
- 1821 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Examine the Key Features of Natural Moral Law & Dicuss Whether Its Strengths Outweigh Its Weaknesses
Aquinas also believed that we can use our rationality to know Natural Law. It is inherent within our human nature, God reveals specific commands but these do not go against natural law but rather, further develop it. Aquinas said that a moral life is a life entirely followed ‘according to reason’.…
- 922 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Plato and Aristotle, arguably the most important philosophers of their time, both made attempts to define justice. Being that Aristotle was a student of Plato, their ideas share many similarities. Both viewed justice as the harmonious interaction of people in a society. However, Plato defined his ideal of justice with more usage of metaphysics, invoking his Form of the Good, while Aristotle took a more practical approach, speaking in terms of money and balance. Although Aristotle's ideal of justice may seem superior, upon further inspection, Plato's ideal of justice is the stronger.…
- 1027 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Although Aristotle did not use the term ‘natural law’ many medieval philosophers considered him as one of the first exponents of the fundamentals of natural law. Stoic philosophy was the first to introduce the term ‘natural law’ with the Stoics emphasising nature and the moral requirement to accept and conform to what is given in nature. This Greek philosophy spanned several centuries and greatly influenced the Roman philosopher Cicero. Cicero (d. 43BC) was a strong advocate of natural law and spoke of natural law as the innate power of reason to direct action. Catholic natural law theory was formulated by St. Thomas Aquinas over seven centuries ago. He identified one fundamental norm of natural law: do good and avoid evil. Doing good in this context is following reason’s lead to actualise human…
- 2320 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
Virtue is the moral character of a person. A virtuous person will try to live up to a high moral standard. A person of virtue is who thought to be kind they we would expect this person to be kind in all different situations. This ethical theory is different from other theories because virtue does not focus on duties and rules or the consequences of an action of helping…
- 503 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays