Preview

APUSH Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
298 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
APUSH Essay
Farboad Rahmatipour T-4
How did state rights and major political personalities contribute to the reemerging of a two party system in the period 1820 to 1840?
Between 1820 and 1840 there were many contributes to the reemergence of a two party system in America. Major political personalities and states’ rights were among the major contributors. Using their influence in the government and people, many major political personalities were able to remerge the two different parties and influence the view of each party. Conflicts and arguments over state rights also ultimately helped the two party system reemerge by creating contrast in the views of states and their people.
States’ rights was a major issue that contributed to the reemergence of a political parties. Jackson proposed that once the federal debt had been paid off, the government would be able to distribute the extra money among the states. This angered the westerners because if the government gave the extra money to the states then it would not be able to lower the price of public land. The west proposed an alliance with the south based on this idea. Daniel Webster was able to prevent this from happening with a speech showing the position of states right to treason. This incident helped in the division of political ideas that led to a separation of political parties.
Both Jackson and Calhoun were not very different in the ideas about America except in the idea of a states right to overrule federal authority. The two of them became almost enemies and there were many times they each would attack the others personal character to try and gain what they wanted. In the end the different views of the two men influenced the views and stances of the political parties and created issues, which further divided the nation.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jacksonian Democrats

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Politically, Jackson's domestic policy was about the people and a better government as shown through his veto of the National Bank and the institution of the Spoils system. Jackson's veto of the Bank of the United States however showed that he wanted to abide by the regulations laid out by the Constitution. In his Bank Veto message, Jackson said that the Bank was unauthorized by the Constitution…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Andrew Jackson can be credited for being either one of the best presidents or one of the worst. It can go either way depending on the ideals of the viewer. Many historians believe that Andrew Jackson abused and overstepped the rights to his presidency, whereas others believe that he expanded and enhanced political power. Jackson greatly influenced and enhanced the power of the presidency. Jackson once declared that while each member of Congress represented a specific regional group, only the president represented all the people of the United States. During Jackson 's term he greatly increased the power of the presidency but believed that it was subject to the will of the people. Jackson carried through an unprecedented program of domestic reform, moving toward a hard-money currency policy, and checking the program of federal internal improvements. Although Jackson 's presidency was subject to many changes, he disapproved of many actions by Congress and vetoed twelve bills, more then all the previous presidents combined. Many of these bills sought to increase federal spending on domestic improvements. The democrats believed that the states, not the national government, should pay for such projects. Overall Jackson 's strong actions won him much praise from the people and in the election of 1828 and 1832 he won a lot of popular votes. He believed himself to be the people 's man and established during his presidency many goals for the expansion and benefit of America. One goal that Jackson believed to be very important was the termination of the Bank of the United States, the "monster bank", which he viewed as a tool for the elitists; he attacked the bank and was successful in destroying it. But aside from that he also accomplished many other things during his presidency. He successfully resolved the nullification crisis in which South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union. He also strengthened the Democratic Party and institutionalized the party system in…

    • 1286 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps the three most influential men in the pre-Civil War era were Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster. These men all died nearly a decade before the civil war began, but they didn't know how much they would effect it. States' rights was a very controversial issue, and one which had strong opposition and radical proposals coming from both sides. John C. Calhoun was in favor of giving states the power to nullify laws that they saw unconstitutional, and he presented this theory in his "Doctrine of Nullification". Daniel Webster strongly disagreed with this proposal and showed this by giving powerful support to President Jackson in resisting the attempt by South Carolina to nullify the ‘tariff of abominations', as they called it; a shipping tax passed in 1828 that they saw as unfairly favoring the industrial North. Henry Clay, the Great Compromiser, didn't seem to be partisan either way, and, although he was a Whig, always came up with a way to please both sides of any argument.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout history the two main parties or the Two Party System in the United States…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Van Buren believed that political parties and that partisan competition could be a good thing, and political parties can help save and preserve the union. People are going to disagree it is important that partisan divisions not be based on sectionalism (north, south). Buren hoped to bring together northerners and southerners in political parties. If they came together in a political party then they could not talk about slavery. Parties could help keep their opponents honest. Keeping the public informed which was vital to the republic.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A major factor in the creation of political parties came through the influence of Alexander Hamilton. During his time as Secretary of the Treasury to George Washington, Hamilton devised five economic programs as a result of his Nation Government ideology. Eric Foner argues that: ‘Political divisions first surfaced over the financial plan developed... in 1790 and 1791’[1]. Hamilton’s financial models won strong support from the American financiers and manufacturers, and the models would only work if America created close links with Great Britain. This ideology sparked resistance from Jefferson and Madison, as they both believed that ‘the future lay in Westward expansion’[2] and thus, the foundations for political divisions were in place due to the ideological differences between Jefferson and Hamilton. Therefore, it can be argued that Hamilton was the main initial influence to instigate political thought in America.…

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the beginning of the nineteenth century, the Republicans and Federalists had developed into two distinct political parties. The controversy over the constitutionality of the First Bank of the United States gave rise to two different interpretations of the Constitution. While the Jeffersonian Republicans held a strict-constructionist view of the Constitution, the Federalists took on a broad-constructionist view of the Constitution. These became defining characteristics of the two political parties. However, during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, the desire of one party to dominate over the other caused both parties to stray away from their original philosophies of government and resort to the other party’s principles. Although the Republicans and Federalists largely stayed true to their respective interpretations of the Constitution, they increasingly embraced the other party’s principles to achieve their goals between 1801 to 1817.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSH Long Essay

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Support, Modify, or Refute: The Monroe Doctrine ushered in a new era of US foreign policy…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many of things lead to the start of the two party system and they were highly influenced by Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. People that lived in different areas had different views about different issues because of this it lead to the two party system some people believed in one and the other people believed in another. People that owned land and grew crops tended to side with Jefferson or the Republicans and people that didn’t own land tended to side with Hamilton or the Federalists. Washington was strongly against the two party system because of the reason that the country might split.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tariff Crisis

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The crisis over the Tariff of 1828 continued into the 1830s and highlighted one of the currents of democracy in the Age of Jackson: namely, that many southerners believed a democratic majority could be harmful to their interests. These southerners saw themselves as an embattled minority and claimed the right of states to nullify federal laws that appeared to threaten state sovereignty.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "There is nothing I dread so much as a division of the Republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader and converting measures in opposition to each other. This...is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution."1 This view, expressed by John Adams, was not shared by all, namely Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. As the early American government began to form, so did the two major political parties. Alexander Hamilton was the founder of the Federalist Party, while Thomas Jefferson led the Anti-Federalists in response.2 Both men used their prominence in each party to their advantage to influence the public and their disputes created controversy and discordance between the parties and the American people. Hamilton and Jefferson had many disagreements throughout their careers and had radically different opinions on what their new country should be like.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Party System Essay

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The emergence of the second party system in the United States is a dynamic piece of our political history. This term was used as a way of stating the political party systems during the time period of the early/middle 1800’s. Due to separate views and rapidly rising voting interest, this is where the United States ultimately split into the Democratic and Whig Party. Although both parties were still growing at the time, both devised many major philosophies and had very important political figures as their leader.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American? Write an essay in which you assess the causes of the two party system and its…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    huge effect on the separation of Political support as they tried to involve states rights. All…

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When the United States was still an infant, George Washington, who was not affiliated with any political party, warned his countrymen against amassing too many political parties. He feared that the electoral fractures wouldn’t be sustained well by a nation that had just begun to unite. In the years following Washington’s inaugural presidency, a two-party system was initiated with John Adams’ Federalists opposing Thomas Jefferson’s Democratic-Republicans. The Whigs came next, followed by the now-familiar Democrats and Republicans, but there were never more than two dominant parties in this country at any one time. Our current configuration of Democrats and Republicans has been in place since the 1860s.…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays