Preview

Antitrust Investigation on Google

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
647 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Antitrust Investigation on Google
Google’s Antitrust Investigation
Amy Wargo
Chamberlain College of Nursing

Google’s Antitrust Investigation

Antitrust is defined as a policy of government to regulate or break up monopolies in order to promote free competition and attain the benefits that such competition can provide to the economy. Monopoly is when there is a single provided product with no close substitutions. As apposed, to a monopoly, a free competition market is the situation in which multiple companies offer identical or close to the same products, which will compete with price and quality, and in some case costumer service. Natural monopolies are markets in which “only one firm finds it profitable to produce” (Masca). They occur in economies where the scale exists over the entire range of the markets demand. It can be difficult to create antitrust legislation because governments have a hard time establishing and enforcing the legislations they created because of the political powers of monopolies.
Google was involved with an antitrust investigation in 2012-2013. Googles original business model was to let everyone get what they wanted and needed by the use of the internet. People want to find how to go around the internet and publishers wanted to reach more readers and users of the information and products. Conflicts didn’t surface until the search engine market became concentrated on Google. It became to be the only search engine people were using and wanted to use, and therefore became a monopoly in the market. Google always wanted it users to get the benefits from the search engine and not have to both seeing advertisements on the side bar, like other search engines were doing at that time. They were bothersome and made the site more confusing and less to the point. There was an antitrust investigation concerning Google for over twenty months, ending in the summer of 2013. The Federal



References: Hoppner, T. (2013). Google: Friend of Doe of Ad-Financed Content Providers?. Journal of Media Law, 5(1), 14-30. Mosca, M. (2008). On the origins of the concept of natural monopoly: Economics of scale competition. European Journal of History of Economic Thought, 15(2), 317-353: Percha, J. (2013, January 3). FTC Settles Antitrust Investigation of Google. Retrieved September 23, 2014, from http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/ftc-settles-google-antitrust-investigation/story?id=18126143

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Google 2014

    • 1208 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Google’s competitive advantage prior to 2004 was based on exploiting their capabilities. Through their company culture, core values, and skilled work force Google created an environment that fostered and generated constant innovation in technology. This innovation allowed their highly skilled engineers to continually capitalize on what was happening/missing in the marketplace by improving based on unmet consumer needs. Due to Google’s capabilities, they were able to add value to technologies already in the marketplace by observing what wasn’t being delivered by the competition. Below is on outline of the innovations launched prior to 2004 that placed Google ahead of the competition:…

    • 1208 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Google vs. Jarg

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Google has found itself in a pickle. The giant internet search engine has been sued for using patented technology. The search technology Google uses was patented back in 1997 by Jarg, Corp. This was one year before Google became incorporated. Jarg was created by Michael Belanger and Dr. Kenneth Baclawski. Baclawski, an assistant professor of computer sciences at Northeastern University, began work on the patented technology in 1994. He later patented the technology under U.S. Patent Number 5,694,593. Belanger claims the company has been aware of the copyright infringement for some time now. Jarg had put off filing the law suit because they had no legal representation and had not been able to find the resources to fund one . Now that legal representation has been found, Northeastern University has joined the lawsuit and Vinson & Elkins, the law firm taking the case, has agreed to do so on a contingency basis, meaning Vinson & Elkins will not receive any payment for their services unless Jarg wins the lawsuit. Vinson & Elkins will provide lawyers to fight the case. They will also be assisted by local counsel where the lawsuit was filed. Though Google was incorporated in 1998, Belanger said he and Baclawski had no idea the company might be infringing the patent, until about 2 1/2 years ago. A representative of a Boston-area law firm told Belanger of seeing a presentation by Google that described the company's Web search technology. The database search technology described in the presentation resembled Northeastern's patented technology.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. "Economics Basics: Monopolies, Oligopolies and Perfect Competition." Investopedia – Educating the World about Finance. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Nov. 2012. <http://www.investopedia.com/university/economics/economics6.asp>.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    micro 1

    • 665 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The purpose of antitrust policy is to promote competition, which leads to lower prices. If a company had the power of price control that comes with being a monopoly, they would profit by picking the quantity/price that equals the highest revenue for their company. This would be likely a lower quantity and higher price than would prevail if there was competition.…

    • 665 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antitrust behaviors tend to create a barrier to market entry and hence creating a natural monopoly or oligopoly. The firms in the oligopoly are then able to undertake price fixing whenever they want and increase their economic profits (Macgregor, 2012). Monopoly pricing is quite significant in antitrust activities, where the price curve is slopped upwards while trying to maintain or increase the demand curve. The firms were investigated for antitrust behaviors under the Sherman Act which is aimed at preserving unfettered and free competition in any trade activity. The antitrust laws under the Sherman Act proscribes any unlawful business and mergers practices in any industry where the act leave it upon the court to make the decision on which mergers or businesses are legal or illegal all based on the current facts (Macgregor,…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    TU100 - TMA02

    • 2168 Words
    • 9 Pages

    While I totally appreciate the slight negative opinions of others here in my personal opinion it all comes down to the fact that Google is actually a business and so has to make money. I appreciate that some of its dealings are a little 'shady' but show me a Global corporation that doesn’t come across this way in some elements of what it does. (Think Apple and its over priced media services.)…

    • 2168 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural Monopoly Examples

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As per Wikipedia, "natural monopoly" is defined as "an industry is said to be a natural monopoly if one firm can produce a desired output at a lower social cost than two or more firms—that is, there are economies of scale in social costs. Unlike in the ordinary understanding of a monopoly, a natural monopoly situation does not mean that only one firm is providing a particular kind of good or service. Rather it is the assertion about an industry, that multiple firms providing a good or service is less efficient (more costly to a nation or economy) than would be the case if a single firm provided a good or service. There may, or may not be, a single supplier in such an industry. This is a normative claim which is used to justify the creation of statutory monopolies, where government prohibits competition by law. Examples of claimed natural monopolies include…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The direct competitive company of Google is Apple. Apple is second to Google in which they are the largest companies in the world. Google had to deal with a antitrust lawsuit in which it was settled. The space along with privacy are some the main problems that Google has to handle. There aren’t many advertisers including Google that has been circling across the default privacy power on Apple’s cell including desktops browsers known as Safari depositing cookies that keep up with the browsing habits. Cookies by default are blocked by Safari there are big issues that are being establish, Google had a written code from it. Google removed the block from its sites to handle the problem, by this time they were already damaged done that were very clear. The centralized agency with U.S. consisting of France’s Commission Nationale de I’Informatique et des Libertes(CNIL) are searching into Google privacy mistakes. The organization that is looking into to see if there were any repetitions that are against the settlement was done through the Federal Trade Commission. “Terms of the agreement prevent Google from falsifying its privacy policy. Google got through this by removing the code form its site to settle the problematic. Yet, today it remains a problem that is very obvious they will likely pay a large…

    • 2942 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tatiana Nikolaevna Kalashnikova/Getty Images CHAPTER 9: MONOPOLY COREECONOMICS, 3RD EDITION BY ERIC CHIANG Slides by Debbie Evercloud © 2013 Worth Publishers CoreEconomics ▪ Chiang/Stone 1 of 48 CHAPTER OUTLINE • Monopoly Markets • Comparing Monopoly and Competition • Regulation and Antitrust © 2013 Worth Publishers CoreEconomics ▪…

    • 2380 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Monopoly- firms that have great control over the price of the goods they sell. In the extreme case, a monopoly is the only seller of a good or service. Reduction in the power of monopolies is the direct aim of antitrust…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Natural Monopolies are companies that provide a service to an area. It increases the setup costs, it lays all the required cables, and it procures the hardware and software that’s required to operate such an enterprise. Companies hire groups of personnel from numerous industries to keep the service running. Nevertheless, it is not the establishment that is a natural monopoly but the service itself. (Beggs, 2005)…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mgt 448 Google in China

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Google is the fastest growing Internet search engine company. Google’s mission is “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.”(International Business: Competing in the Global marketplace, pg 148-149) They have a mantra of “Don’t be Evil.” Google started this mantra to be the main message to show consumers they would not compromise the integrity of its search results. This case reviews the situation under which Google was required to censor its content and chose to launch its new search engine site. The case explains the role of the Chinese government and its regulations in the Internet market which had a negative effect on Google 's operations in China.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Google Case Analysis

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In looking at the issue of whether or not Google’s “filter bubble” conflicts with one of their key corporate values of “don’t be evil,” it is necessary to understand why the company is filtering search results and who is meant to ultimately benefit from the practice. As part of their strategy they promised to preserve the integrity of search results and to never manipulate the rankings to give their partners an unfair advantage or let somebody “buy” a better PageRank. If the purpose of filtering results were meant to solely increase profits or give certain companies an unfair advantage it would most certainly seem to conflict with the values that Page and Brin instilled when Google was a younger company. However, I believe that while Google’s filter bubble is far from perfect, it is not evil and does not conflict with their strategy because it benefits consumers by producing relevant results which improves the service.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Telecommunications Law

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A natural monopoly is said to exist in any market where the costs of production are such that it is less expensive for demand to be met by one firm than it would be for that same demand to be met by more than one firm (Benjamin et al., 2005).…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Google Alliances

    • 4432 Words
    • 18 Pages

    June 5, 2003 - Google and Lycos Europe today announced an agreement whereby Google will provide relevant content-targeted ads to the member pages of Europe's largest homepage building community, Lycos Tripod. This agreement extends the reach for Google advertisers to a potential of four million member pages of Lycos Tripod, while enabling Lycos Europe to generate revenue from one of its…

    • 4432 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics