Preview

ANTI ROWLATT AGITATION

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7412 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ANTI ROWLATT AGITATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Background
Satyagraha Movement & Rowlatt Act (1919)
Rowlatt committee
Committee members
War Ends, Emergency Powers Continue
Events
In Delhi
In the presidency of Bombay
In the Punjab
Anti-Rowlatt Satyagrha intended to mobilize public opinion against the act
Jallianwala bagh massacre
Reaction
In Lahore
The hunter commission
Assassination of Michael O’ Dwyer
Some facts about Rowlatt act
Conclusion
References

ANTI ROWLATT AGITATION
Introduction
In 1919 Justice Rowlatt looked at the situation and recommended tough new laws to deal with those who stirred up protests. In 1919 his proposals became law, known as the Rowlatt Act. Some salient features of the Rowlatt act are that the people could be tried in private by three High Court Judges. There was no right of appeal. People could be ordered to live in a particular place or could be stopped from attending meetings. Moreover, there was also a chance that people could be arrested without warrant and kept in prison without trial. Indians were furious with the new laws. They caused uproar in India, Gandhi started the hartal against it and Jinnah resigned from the Imperial Legislative Council in protest.
The Rowlatt Act, passed by the Imperial Legislative Council in London on March 10, 1919, indefinitely extending "emergency measures" (of the Defence of India Regulations Act) enacted during the First World War in order to control public unrest and root out conspiracy in India. Passed on the recommendations of the Rowlatt Committee and named after its president, British judge Sir Sidney Rowlatt, this act effectively authorized the government to imprison any person suspected of terrorism living in the Raj for up to two years without a trial, and gave the imperial authorities power to deal with all revolutionary activities. The unpopular legislation provided for stricter control of the press, arrests without warrant, indefinite detention without trial, and juryless in camera trials



References: Satyagraha Movement & Rowlatt Act (1919) “Towards the end of the First World War the British decided that firm action was needed to keep a grip on India, especially with the threat of renewed violence Events in the Presidency of Bombay In Bombay the Satyagraha Sabha proclaimed Sunday, April 6 to be a day of humiliation and prayer throughout India (London Times, 1919 April 11, p Events in the Punjab A Gurkha general once remarked that "every revolutionary eruption in India endeavors to establish itself in the Punjab (Woodyatt, 1922, p It was first countrywide agitation by Gandhi. He founded Satyagraha Sabha at Bombay on 24 Feb, 1919. It marked the foundation of Non-Cooperation Movement.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of the main ways the national government was responsible for the failure of political extremism in the 1930s was through direct action. The government introduced two acts, the Public order act of 1936 and the Incitement of Disaffection Act of 1934. The law introduced in 1936 stopped the extremists from wearing uniforms and gave the police power to stop political demonstrations and meetings. The other law introduced in 1934 enabled the police to arrest anyone who showed signs of extreme violence. Both of these direct actions from the government made political extremism fail because the people in the party were being arrested before they could protest and express their parties policies fully.…

    • 647 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believe that in the 1940’s most of India’s problems involving independence was to do with divisions within India rather than British imperialism. In this essay I will be looking at both points of view and finally giving my opinion. I will be using three sources also to help me show both sides of the story. I will also be using my further knowledge to add a wider range of knowledge.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    We find out much about British rule in India from the outbreak of fighting of the mutiny before 1857 as it tells us about how the East India Company forced strict rules and intervened upon the Hindu society such as ignoring their religious beliefs, which was one of the key factors leading up to the Indian ‘mutiny’. We see that although some changes did benefit from the Indians, the general attitude was negative, since all Indians were heavily taxed as discriminated. The way Britain changed from a trader to a ruler reveals to us how greedy Britain were at the time and how powerful as they could gain control of such a big country like India. We also can see how the British abused their power as they treated the Indians unfairly, as, in an account written by Vishnubhat Godse, an Indian who was living in the city of Jhansi in 1857, described how they British took…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sources 10, 11 and 12 suggest that the Amritsar Massacre, the incident in which British troops under the order of General Dyer fired at a crowd of Indian protesters on the 13th April 1919, did create widespread and long-lasting hostility among Indians towards the British. Creating the British government to be portrayed as repressive and irresponsible. However, the alternative view presented by the sources is that Indians were not hostile towards the British, but they were in fact appreciative of their help and did not feel that they were repressive.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bryant Huang, Mrs. Sjol, AP Lang, 1 March 2024, 2019 Rhetorical Analysis Rewrite. Before the outbreak of the Second World War in the mid-20th century, India had been subjected to nearly a century of colonial rule by Great Britain leading to the Salt March and eventual Indian independence in 1947. In 1930 Mohandas “Mahatma” Gandhi, an Indian lawyer often regarded as the father of his country, sent a handwritten letter to the representative of the British crown in India, Viceroy Lord Irwin, which aimed to end Indian oppression through nonviolent means. Through his use of charged language and repetition, Gandhi conveys his desire for peace and justice along with the Indian people’s resentment of British colonial rule and longing for independence.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘The law for the removal of Distress of People and State’ or more commonly known as the enabling act was another factor that…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Movie Gandhi Imperialism

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Causes of the social unrest of India was not only caused by Britain, but also by…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amritsar Massacre or “Jallianwala Bagh massacre’’, as it took place in on the 13th of April 1919 in Jallianwala Bagh garden in Amritsar, a city located in the north of India. General Reginald Edward Dyer had announced before 13 April that ‘’ any processions or gatherings of four men will be looked upon and treated as an unlawful assembly and dispersed by force of arms if necessary’’ (Cavendish, R., 2009). In the enclosed compound were about 5000 to 20 000 Indians according to different sources(Bose, P., & Lyons, L.,1999) They were in fact protesting peacefully against the “Rowlatt act” concerning the right of appeal for the people involved in seditious activities. Dyer placed the military vehicles in front of the only door of the garden and ordered the shooting of all the unarmed civilians. The shooting lasted until the British armed men ran out of ammunition. In fact, the military used approximately 1650 rounds of ammunition, killing 379 civilians and wounding 1136 others (Bose, P., & Lyons, L., 1999). The Amritsar Massacre is considered as a major turning point that led the British government to consider the possible independence of the Indian State as the massacre became source of controversies between the British officials and the Indian nationalists. All sources state clearly that the British government condemned the massacre and qualified it as ‘’unbritish’’. Churchill declared that the massacre was 'an extraordinary event, a monstrous event, an event which stands in singular and sinister isolation'. Dyer, standing before the commission charged of investigating the massacre, declared that he acted according to the rule of law, by engaging more precisely the ‘’minimum force’’ policy of public-order (Doyle, 2011). Subsequently, he also justified his action by the fact that the Indian nationals were defying the British authorities, and his action…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The chance of revolution was reduced by the repressive policies put in place by Pitt as it subdued the radicals, as he adopted and introduced laws to extinguish the growth and spread of radical ideas. Habeas corpus (a legal action, through which a prisoner can be released from unlawful detention)was suspended by Pitt, allowing people to be imprisoned without trial for as long as it is wished. The suspension of Habeas corpus gave Pitt the right to have suspected radicals imprisoned to prevent them spreading their ideas or taking action. Another law that came into action during Pitts time in office was the 1793 Aliens Act, which prevented foreigners from entering the United Kingdom without permission, this was a precaution taken to stop the influx of French revolutionaries entering the country bringing with them radical ideas. The 1795 Public Meetings Act made meetings of more than 50 people illegal, this was a measure also to prevent radicals meeting and spreading their ideas. All these measures were introduced to dampen the spread and popularity of the radical movement, these policies however were not the only ones that help do this.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gandhis Impact

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the early 1930’s, Gandhi’s movement for India's independence took a new form when he introduced the civil disobedience movement. During the 1920’s when Gandhi had first introduced a sense of nationalism among his fellow Indians, he did so with great passion yet there was still much to be done to gain respect from the British. His campaign for Swaraj took a new form when his demands were ignored, and he introduced the Civil Disobedience movement in the early 1930’s.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    India, throughout history, has been subject to numerous cases of persecution, subjugation, conquest and oppression. Successful conquest of India is a difficult yet lucrative investment and can easily help supplement and revitalise an economy through the trade of its bountiful natural resources. Despite India’s monetary value, the Official British policy stated there were ulterior motives for its conquest of India, such as the fulfilment of the British policy of ‘White Man’s Burden’; with the eventual aim of establishing an Indian self-government. It can however be suggested, that such seemingly sincere claims were merely fabricated as a means of providing a stable source of trade for the British economy or as a means of further imposing British imperialist dominance across Europe.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Menon, P. (1997, Jan 10). A History of Modern India: the civil disobedience movement in 1920-22. India Abroad. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/362707119?accountid=40965…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    These repressive measures taken by the British Government basically aimed at combatting the revolutionary activities of revolutanires like Bhagat Singh. In response to this, the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association planned to explode a bomb in the Central Legislative Assembly where the ordinance was going to be passed. This idea was originated in the mind of Bhagat Singh, who was influenced by a similar bombing by a martyr anarchist Auguste Vaillant in the French Assembly. Tha plan was to send Bhagat Singh off to Russia, while Batukeshwar Dutt should carry on the bombing with Sukhdev. Sukhdev then forced Bhagat Singh to call for another meeting and here it was decided, against the initial agreement, that Batukeshwar Dutt and Bhagat Singh would carry on the bombing. Bhagat Singh also disapproved that the two should be escorted after the bombing by the rest of the party.…

    • 4843 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There were massive protests and demonstrations by the Indian people against this measure of the government. Gandhi also took very active part in this. He started a Satyagrah Sabha which campaigned against this act asking people to disobey it and court arrest. He also gave a call for country-wide hartal which was observed in various places on different dates. But it was generally a success. The government responded with depression. In the Punjab, this repression took its worst form and in the Jallianwala Bagh the military under General Dyer shot at unarmed people without warning. Hundreds of persons – men, women and children – died. This Jallianwala Bagh massacre and the subsequent imposition of martial law in the Punjab horrified the whole country and generated anger against the British rule.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Shadow Lines

    • 2624 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The characters in this novel – except that of Tridib – are realistically portrayed and are not larger than life. Each one is portrayed with all the weaknesses that make them endearing. Each one is believable . But Tridib does not seem to belong to this world. He comes across as a ‘seer’, someone endowed with extra-sensory and extra-visionary abilities.…

    • 2624 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays