Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Anti-Globalization Movement: A Call for Global Integration?

Good Essays
749 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anti-Globalization Movement: A Call for Global Integration?
Anti-Globalization Movement presentation
Definition:
Anti-globalization Movement is a disputed term referring to the international social movement network that gained widespread media attention after protests against the World Trade Organization in Seattle, WA in late November and early December 1999. Activists and scholars debate whether it constitutes a single social movement or represents a collection of allied groups. Including diverse constituencies with a range of ideological orientations, the global movement is broadly critical of the policies of economic neoliberalism, or “corporate globalization,” that has guided international trade and development since the closing decades of the 20th century. Varied communities organizing against the local and national consequences of neoliberal policies, especially in the global South, connect their actions with this wider effort. Movement constituents include trade unionists, environmentalists, anarchists, land rights activists, organizations promoting human rights and sustainable development, opponents of privatization, and anti-sweatshop campaigners. These groups charge that the policies of corporate globalization have exacerbated global poverty and increased inequality.
Participants base their criticisms on a number of related ideas. What is shared is that participants oppose what they see as large, multi-national corporations having unregulated political power, exercised through trade agreements and deregulated financial markets. Specifically, corporations are accused of seeking to maximize profit at the expense of work safety conditions and standards, labor hiring and compensation standards, environmental conservation principles, and the integrity of national legislative authority, independence and sovereignty.
Many anti-globalization activists call for forms of global integration that better provide democratic representation, advancement of human rights, fair trade and sustainable development and therefore feel the term "anti-globalization" is misleading.

Ideology:
Supporters believe that by the late 20th century those they characterized as "ruling elites" seek to control the expansion of world markets for their own interests; this combination of the Bretton Woods institutions, states, and multinational corporations has been called globalization. In reaction, various social movements emerged to challenge their influence; these movements have been called anti-globalization.

Causes:
People opposing globalization believe that international agreements and global financial institutions, such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization, undermine local decision-making. Corporations that use these institutions to support their own corporate and financial interests, can exercise privileges that individuals and small businesses cannot,[10] including the ability to: move freely across borders, extract desired natural resources, and use a wide variety of human resources.
The movement aims for an end to the legal status of "corporate personhood" and the dissolution of free market fundamentalism and the radical economic privatization measures of the World Bank, the IMF, and the World Trade Organization.
Activists are especially opposed to the various abuses which they think are perpetuated by globalization and the international institutions that, they say, promote neoliberalism without regard to ethical standards or environmental protection. Common targets include theWorld Bank (WB), International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and theWorld Trade Organization (WTO) and free trade treaties like the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), the Trans Pacific Trade Agreement (TPPA), the Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) and the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). In light of the economic gap between rich and poor countries, adherents of the movement claim that free trade without measures to protect the environment and the health and wellbeing of workers will merely increase the power of industrialized nations. Proponents of this line of thought refer to the process as polarization and argue that current neo-liberal economic policies have given wealthier states an advantage over developing nations, enabling their exploitation and leading to a widening of the global wealth gap.
A report by Jean Ziegler, UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food, notes that "millions of farmers are losing their livelihoods in the developing countries, but small farmers in the northern countries are also suffering" and concludes that "the current inequities of the global trading system are being perpetuated rather than resolved under the WTO, given the unequal balance of power between member countries." [13] Activists point to the unequal footing and power between developed and developing nations within the WTO and with respect to global trade, most specifically in relation to the protectionist policies towards agriculture enacted in many developed countries. These activists also point out that heavy subsidization of developed nations' agriculture and the aggressive use of export subsidies by some developed nations to make their agricultural products more attractive on the international market are major causes of declines in the agricultural sectors of many developing nations.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The anti-globalization movement does have some additional success that have made an impact for reasons of leading the way for branches that are an extension of the anti-globalization movement to bring about change such as biotechnology, human rights and media reform, often demonstrating its wide-reaching influence on policy issues. In addition there have been new organizations and movements within the movement, such as the street medic and medicine movement, which have grown in numbers and organizations (BALM, Black Cross, DC Action Medical Network, etc.). Another success occurred through protest when campus groups have persuaded university administrators at numerous universities around the country to refuse to buy school apparel from companies…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This allows corporations to indirectly support political leaders, but ultimately they cannot voice their concerns. The essay also argues that corporations do in fact deserve to have the same protections since they are not technically able to vote, but must pay taxes. Without the ability to have free political speech, these corporations technically do not have any way to influence any decision that may affect their businesses or trades. The essay…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term "globalization" has been appropriated by the powerful to refer to a specific form of international economic integration, one based on investor rights, with the interests of people incidental. That is why the business press, in its more honest moments, refers to the "free trade agreements" as "free investment agreements" (Wall St. Journal). Accordingly, advocates of other forms of globalization are described as "anti-globalization"; and some, unfortunately, even accept this term, though it is a term of propaganda that should be dismissed with ridicule. No sane person is opposed to globalization, that is, international integration. Surely not the left and the workers movements, which were founded on the principle of international solidarity—that is, globalization in a form that attends to the rights of people, not private power…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    APA 1

    • 1340 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ayres, J. M., Caniglia, B. S., Chabot, S., Giugni, M. G., Hanagan, M., Lewis, T. L., ... & Tarrow, S. (2002). Globalization and resistance: Transnational dimensions of social movements. J. Smith, & H. Johnston (Eds.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through personal and deep rooted ideals, Naomi Klein provides a chronological account on two and a half years of various protests and speeches all over the world that revolve around the issue of globalization. "Fences and Windows" is a tightly bound compilation of newspaper articles and speeches packed together to encompass basic themes of a dwindling democracy caused by the "...internationalization..." of a neo-liberalist ideology. (p.78)…

    • 560 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aff Ld Case

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The results of the 2010 election bore out progressive fears as corporate-front groups flooded the electoral zone with massive contributions to reactionary Tea Party candidates. In fact, as Leonard's film makes clear, the kind of independent groups that corporations are now allowed to support spent $300 million to influence the 2010 midterm elections, more than every midterm election since 1990 combined.CONTENTION II: CORPORATIONS ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVE BODIESDavid Kairys, “Money Isn’t Speech and Corporations Aren’t People,” Slate Magazine, January 22, 2010.In Citizens United, Justice Kennedy discusses business corporations as if they were clubs or political associations with political viewpoints and elected leaders. But corporate managers don't function as representatives or employees of shareholders, who have no say, no shared political views, and no expectation that their investments will be used for political ends …. Increasing the constitutional rights of corporations beyond their business purposes is really about increasing the rights and power of corporate managers. Government has enabled corporate managers to control huge accumulations of wealth without any personal risk—an arrangement that contributes to wild, bubble-producing economic swings and collapses. Citizens United invites that arrangement directly into politics and elections.CONTENTION III: FOREIGN ACCESSJason Linkins, “The Supreme Court’s Citizens United Decision is Terrifying,” Huffington Post, March 23, 2010.A very large percentage of U.S. corporations are owned by foreign persons or entities. In 2006, USA Today reported: "Nearly one in five U.S. oil refineries is owned by foreign companies. Foreign companies…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the process of globalization, the world that we live in today has become more preoccupied with the notion of consumption. Exploitation of the vast majority has led to movements like Occupy Wall Street. The Occupy Wall Street movement was a movement that pinpointed and spoke out against some of the injustices that the working class faces from day to day.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Rise of Big Business

    • 2971 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Today, the Big Business is one of the main features of the modern economic environment. Big Business refers mainly to corporations, huge economic entities operating for profit and distributing the ownership by the means of stocks. The Big Business started to grow in America after the Civil War, in the 1860s and already reached its peak of strengths by the “roaring” 1920s. Although Big Business faces much social and governmental control nowadays, its power is still enormous. Large business corporations provide most of economic output, employment places, financial investments, and production output. Politics is also very much influenced by the large corporations and is often forced into pursuing businesses’ strategic interests. Even average citizens get much of Big Business influence through employment, and corporations’ PR campaigns, marketing strategies, and other public policies. David Korten, in his book When Corporations Rule The World, points out that often corporations have more power than a state. Korten argues that, “Corporations have emerged as the dominant governance institutions on the planet, with the largest among them reaching into virtually every country of the world and exceeding most governments in size and power. Increasingly, it is the corporate interest more than the human interest that defines the policy agendas of states and international bodies… ”. The impact of the corporations on the society is so great that the economic analytics have even labeled the modern political and economic system as corporate capitalism. Thus, the contemporary economic environment can be without much doubt considered the world of “Big Business”.…

    • 2971 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before going in depth about the article, it is important to know from where the idea of anti-globalization comes from and how the movement came into being. Some argue that is all started from Seattle, but a lot of them are unaware of the fact that AGM has gone through three waves. The first wave was back in 1970, when oil prices skyrocketed due to economic downturn, which lead to strikes, protests and demonstrations. The second wave erupted with the end of the cold war, during the early 1990’s and the third wave democracy spread like wild fire. The third and most important wave was during the 50th anniversary of Bretton Woods when the WTO emerged from the GATT. The third wave lead to many activist groups to rise and this lead to overlapping emphasis on various issues like; anti-capitalist groups, women’s rights groups, global inequality groups, and many others.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The book is broken up into four major sections. The first section of the book explains today’s globalization system and how it functions. The second section explains how countries, communities, companies, and individuals interact with the system. The third section is dedicated to those who are against globalization, or the “backlashers.” Finally, the fourth section explains the role of the US and how we should be functioning and…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Globalization101.org follows the second approach: viewing globalization as a process of interaction and integration. A focus on the spread of American ideas or products that ignores the counterbalancing impact of the access to the international arena of ideas and products formerly kept out of it, promotes an impoverished and unbalanced understanding of the process. Thus, Globalization101.org defines globalization as follows: Globalization is the acceleration and intensification of interaction and integration among the people, companies, and governments…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Globalization Myths

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In today’s world, there are so many things that get overlooked or don’t even come into conversation. With incidents and worldwide transactions that happen every second and factors that influence our everyday decisions, Globalization is not something one talks about everyday. Peter Dicken, author of Global shift introduced the book by 5 myths of globalization per other contradictions of other authors, business strategist, globalists and anti globalists. Dicken, (2011) mentioned, “Globalization is not always good (contra the neo-liberal hyper-globalizers)” and “Globalization is not always bad (contra the anti-globalizers)” (p. 8). I agree with Dickens point on Globalization not always being a bad thing, contra the anti-globalizers.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canadian Globalization

    • 3233 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Canadian scholar Marshall McLuhan once said that the world is becoming more and more like a “global village,” each nation part of an increasingly interconnected society that stretches across national boundaries (6). Although he was talking about the role of new media in this change, he also was probably talking about the growing economic links that come with globalization. Globalization is a process that offers both the opportunity for a better world and the risk of destroying local communities, regional cultures, and entire natural environments. Over the last century, globalization has become a major issue in politics, environmental studies, and economics, touching every corner of earth as corporations spread. But Globalization is a broad term that does not necessarily mean one single thing. It usually describes the increasing interconnectedness of economies, political institutions, and individuals as the result of communication, transportation, and goods provided by multinational corporations. As Justin Ervin and Zachary Smith define it, “Globalization can now be seen as a process that ‘shrinks’ the world as human interaction ‘thickens’” (4). The effects of globalization are neither good nor bad; there are costs and benefits as with most things in life. What is certain is that no nation on earth has not yet felt the effects of globalization.…

    • 3233 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many theorists, by contrast, have argued that one of the trends of globalization is depoliticization of publics, the decline of the nation-state, and end of traditional politics (Boggs 2000). While I would agree that globalization is promoted by tremendously powerful economic forces and that it often undermines democratic movements and decisionmaking, I would also argue that there are openings and possibilities for a globalization from below, and that globalization can thus help promote as well as undermine democracy.11 As noted, however, globalization from below can implement and inflect globalization both for positive and progressive ends like democracy and social justice, as well as destructive ones like terrorism. In general, globalization involves both a disorganization and reorganization of capitalism, a tremendous restructuring process, which creates openings for progressive social change and intervention. In a more fluid and open economic and political system, oppositional forces can gain concessions, win victories, and effect progressive changes. During the 1970s, new social movements, new non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and new forms of struggle and solidarity emerged that have been expanding to the present day (Hardt and Negri 2000; Burbach 2001; and Foran 2003). And, as noted, destructive forces are also unleashed like terrorism and the sorts of civil war apparent in Africa and other parts of the developing world. The present conjuncture, I would suggest, is marked by a conflict between growing centralization and organization of power and wealth in the hands of the few contrasted with opposing processes exhibiting a fragmentation of power that is more plural, multiple, and open to contestation. As the following analysis will suggest, both tendencies are observable and…

    • 16051 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No Logo Critique

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Naomi Klein’s No Logo states that corporations have been championing globalization using the reasons that globalization allows U.S. consumers to benefit from cheaper products produced abroad, while developing nations benefit from the economic growth stimulated by foreign investments. The generally accepted belief is that governmental policies should be established in favor of the corporations to facilitate the trickling down of corporate profits to the end consumers and workers abroad. Klein, however, contends that globalization rarely benefit the workers in the developing countries.…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays