Anthropological Theory
Anthropology and gender
Introduction: anthropology and its theories
Before tackling subareas and intersections of the field such as anthropology and gender, it is necessary to question what Anthropology is. The common knowledge about this discipline is most of the time permeated with misconceptions and myths, which La Fontaine tries to refute in his book “What is Social Anthropology” (1985). Firs of all, the author starts from exposing what anthropology is not: it is not the study of exotic and primitive societies (no good or bad savage) with emphasis on the progressive social evolution, and it is not sociology in what concerns its theoretical and practical approaches. Most of theses assumptions contains a kernel of truth and are related to the fact that it has been usual to regard anthropology 's traditional focus on small-scale non-industrial societies as one of its distinctive characteristic. However, changes in the world and in the discipline itself made such features no longer an accurate description. In fact, practically any social system can be studied anthropologically and contemporary anthropological research displays an enormous range, empirically as well as thematically.
Beyond what anthropology is not, it is necessary to have a positive concept of the discipline, one that is able to understand what it is, how to do it and its practical use. However, “construct a single perspective that encompasses the variety of anthropological viewpoints is impossible” (Peacock,1986:ix) so here a very general, rough and concise one will be explored. It is in its widest sense, anthropology would be the study of cultural diversity, the search for cultural universals, the unlocking of social structure, the interpretation of symbolism, and numerous related problems.
Anthropology is an intellectually challenging, theoretically ambitious subject which tries to achieve an understanding of culture, society and humanity through detailed studies of local life, supplemented
Introduction: anthropology and its theories
Before tackling subareas and intersections of the field such as anthropology and gender, it is necessary to question what Anthropology is. The common knowledge about this discipline is most of the time permeated with misconceptions and myths, which La Fontaine tries to refute in his book “What is Social Anthropology” (1985). Firs of all, the author starts from exposing what anthropology is not: it is not the study of exotic and primitive societies (no good or bad savage) with emphasis on the progressive social evolution, and it is not sociology in what concerns its theoretical and practical approaches. Most of theses assumptions contains a kernel of truth and are related to the fact that it has been usual to regard anthropology 's traditional focus on small-scale non-industrial societies as one of its distinctive characteristic. However, changes in the world and in the discipline itself made such features no longer an accurate description. In fact, practically any social system can be studied anthropologically and contemporary anthropological research displays an enormous range, empirically as well as thematically.
Beyond what anthropology is not, it is necessary to have a positive concept of the discipline, one that is able to understand what it is, how to do it and its practical use. However, “construct a single perspective that encompasses the variety of anthropological viewpoints is impossible” (Peacock,1986:ix) so here a very general, rough and concise one will be explored. It is in its widest sense, anthropology would be the study of cultural diversity, the search for cultural universals, the unlocking of social structure, the interpretation of symbolism, and numerous related problems.
Anthropology is an intellectually challenging, theoretically ambitious subject which tries to achieve an understanding of culture, society and humanity through detailed studies of local life, supplemented
References: Barnard, A. (2000). History and theory in anthropology / Alan Barnard. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2000. Benedict, R. (1947). The chrysanthemum and the sword : patterns of Japanese culture / by Ruth Benedict. London : Secker & Warburg, 1947 Bloch, M Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble : feminism and the subversion of identity / Judith Butler. New York : Routledge, c1999. Cllifford, James and Marcus, George (2011)Writing culture : the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, Calif : University of California Press. Engels, F., & Untermann, E. (2010). The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State [electronic resource] / Friedrich Engels; translated by Ernest Untermann. Project Gutenberg, 2010. Eriksen, T. (2004). What is anthropology? / Thomas Hylland Eriksen. London ; Ann Arbor, MI : Pluto, 2004. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1969). The Nuer : a description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic people / by E.E Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality / Michel Foucault ; translated from the French by Robert Hurley Freud, S. (1950). Totem and taboo : some points of agreement between the mental lives of savages and neurotics / by Sigmund Freud ; authorized translation by James Strachey. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1950 Geertz, C Kuper, A., & Kuper, J. (1996). The social science encyclopedia / edited by Adam Kuper and Jessica Kuper. London ; New York : Routledge, 1996. La Fontaine, J. S. (1985). What is social anthropology? / Jean La Fontaine. London ; Baltimore, Md. : E. Arnold, 1985. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology. / Translated from the French by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf. New York : Basic Books, [c1963-76]. Lyons, A. P., & Lyons, H. (2004). Irregular connections : a history of anthropology and sexuality / Andrew P. Lyons and Harriet D. Lyons. Lincoln : University of Nebraska Press, c2004. Malinowski, B. (2001). Sex and repression in savage society [electronic resource] / Bronislaw Malinowski. London ; New York : Routledge, 2001. Millett, K. (1972). Sexual politics / Kate Millett. London : Abacus, published by Sphere Books, 1972, c1970. Ortner, S. B., & Whitehead, H. (1981). Sexual meanings : the cultural construction of gender and sexuality / edited by Sherry B. Ortner and Harriet Whitehead. Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 1981. Peacock, J. L. (1986). The anthropological lens : harsh light, soft focus / James L. Peacock. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire] ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 1986. Rubin, Gayle “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” Toward an Anthropology of Women. Ed. Rayna R. Reiter (New York: Monthly Review, 1975) Schneider, David