Antecedents to Temporary Employee’s Turnover Intentions
Antecedents to Temporary Employee’s Turnover Intentions
Jeffrey P. Slattery*
Northeastern State University-Broken Arrow
3100 East New Orleans
Broken Arrow, OK 74014
918.449.6000 Ext. 6558
Email: slattery@nsuok.edu
T.T. Rajan Selvarajan
University of Houston-Victoria
School of Business
14000 Univeristy Blvd.
Sugar Land, TX 77479
281.275.3381
Email: selvaragant@uhv.edu
* Address all correspondence to Jeffrey P. Slattery
Running Head: Attecedents to Temporary Employee’s Turnover Intentions
Submitted for possible inclusion in the program for the Organizational Behavior and Organizational Theory track at the March 31-April 2, 2005 Midwest Academy of Management’s Annual Meeting.
Abstract Examining the associations between job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention among temporary employees was the purpose of this study. Since temporary employees are employed by temporary agencies but perform their work in client organizations to which they are assigned, this study examines temporary employee attitudes in relation to turnover intentions for both the temporary agencies and the client organizations. Based on the extant literature on work attitudes, we proposed a structural model depicting hypothesized associations between job satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnover intention for both the temporary agency and client organization. Data was collected from temporary employees who work for a large temporary agency that has franchises throughout the United States. The response rate was 8.6% (n = 1,262). The results, based on structural equation modeling, provide support for nearly all of the hypothesized associations in the model. Concerning the client organization, we found positive associations between job satisfaction and organization commitment and negative associations between job satisfaction and turnover intention and organizational commitment and turnover intention. Similar
Jeffrey P. Slattery*
Northeastern State University-Broken Arrow
3100 East New Orleans
Broken Arrow, OK 74014
918.449.6000 Ext. 6558
Email: slattery@nsuok.edu
T.T. Rajan Selvarajan
University of Houston-Victoria
School of Business
14000 Univeristy Blvd.
Sugar Land, TX 77479
281.275.3381
Email: selvaragant@uhv.edu
* Address all correspondence to Jeffrey P. Slattery
Running Head: Attecedents to Temporary Employee’s Turnover Intentions
Submitted for possible inclusion in the program for the Organizational Behavior and Organizational Theory track at the March 31-April 2, 2005 Midwest Academy of Management’s Annual Meeting.
Abstract Examining the associations between job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention among temporary employees was the purpose of this study. Since temporary employees are employed by temporary agencies but perform their work in client organizations to which they are assigned, this study examines temporary employee attitudes in relation to turnover intentions for both the temporary agencies and the client organizations. Based on the extant literature on work attitudes, we proposed a structural model depicting hypothesized associations between job satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnover intention for both the temporary agency and client organization. Data was collected from temporary employees who work for a large temporary agency that has franchises throughout the United States. The response rate was 8.6% (n = 1,262). The results, based on structural equation modeling, provide support for nearly all of the hypothesized associations in the model. Concerning the client organization, we found positive associations between job satisfaction and organization commitment and negative associations between job satisfaction and turnover intention and organizational commitment and turnover intention. Similar
References: Allen, P. and Seinko, S. (1997). A comparison of contingent and core workers ' perceptions of their jobs ' characteristics and motivational properties. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, Summer 1997; 62, 3, 4-12. Bureau of Labor statistics (2001). Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley. Burr, M. (1997). Permanent temps. Government Executive, 29, 40-45. Currivan D.B. (1999). The causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in models of employee turnover. Human Resource Management Review, 10534822, Winter 99, Vol. 9, Issue 4. Estavo, M. and Latch, S. (1999). Measuring temporary labor outsourcing. NBER Working Paper 7424). National Bureau of Economic Research. Frazee, V. (1996). Employers worry over using temps. Personnel Journal, 75, 28. Horn, P.W and Griffeth, R.W. (1995). Employee turnover. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Kahn, R.L., Wolfe, D.M., Quinn, R.P., Snoek, J.D., & Rosenthal, R.A Koetz, G. (1996). U.S. labor gets flexible, Business Week, 3458, 22. Koys, D. (2001). The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit-level, longitudinal study, Personnel Psychology, 54(1), Spr 2001, 101-114. Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M, D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297-1349). Chicago: Rand-McNally Lincoln, J Mowday, R.T., Koberg, C.S., & McArthur, A.W. (1984). The psychology of the withdrawal process: A cross-validation test of Mobley=s intermediate linkages model of turnover in two samples. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 79-94. Mueller, C.W., Boyer, E.M., Price, J.L., and Iverson, R.D. (1994). Employee attachment and noncoercive conditions of work: The case of dental hygienists. Work and Occupations, 21, 179-212. Neuman, and Reed, D. (2002). Employment Relationships in the New Economy. NBER Working Paper 8910). National Bureau of Economic Research. Price, J. L. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. Rizzo, J.R., House, R.J., and Lirtzman, S.I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150-163. Vandenberg, R. J. and Scarpello, V. (1994). A longitudinal assessment of the determinant relationship between employee commitments to the occupation and the organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 535-547. von Hippel, C., Mangum, S.L., Greenberger, D.B., Skoglind, J.D. and Heneman, R.L. (1997). Temporary employment: Can organizations and employees both win? Academy of Management Executive, 11, 93-104. Williams, L. J. and Hazer, J. T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A re-analysis using latent variable structural equations models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 219-231.