Preview

Anselm Ontological Argument Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
118 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anselm Ontological Argument Analysis
Anselm is not trying to say that whatever one can think of exist because, everyone can think of something that does not exist. Neither is he trying to saying believing in something without any doubt makes it exist. Finally Anselm might believe in God, he is not trying to convince us that God exist but rather he is trying to show us that once one understands or grasp the concept of who or what God, then based on logic it follows that God has to exist. Anselm ontological argument follows that if one makes an assumption and can show things that follow from that assumption lead to contradiction, then the initial assumption is rejected and conclude the opposite
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    • Explain Anselm's Ontological Argument (25 Marks)
    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    • Explain Anselm's Ontological Argument (25 Marks)

    Anselm put forward his ideas about the existence of God through his book, the Proslogion. He started by simply giving the word ‘God’ a definition, and then explaining that to not believe in God was absurd. The Proslogion consisted of two main parts. In Proslogion 1, Anselm explained God as being…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument

    explanation that God necessarily exists. Anselm's goal is to prove to the "fool" that God has to…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Teleological Argument Analysis
    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Teleological Argument Analysis

    There is one prevailing question we ask ourselves consistently, “Does God exist?” Every human answer’s that question in their own unique way, which is contingent upon their beliefs, experiences, and influences. The existence of God was significantly debated among philosophers during the 18th and 19th centuries and each esteemed philosopher had a distinct argument explaining their rationale, while criticizing another’s. In this paper, I will analyze William Paley’s argument, “The Teleological Argument,” and how it is disparaged by David Hume and his argument for apparent…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Modern Versions Of The Ontological Argument
    • 2339 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Summary: Modern Versions Of The Ontological Argument

    One influential attempt to ground the ontological argument in the notion of God as an unlimited being. As Malcolm describes this idea:…

    • 2339 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmological Argument From Evil Essay
    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cosmological Argument From Evil Essay

    In Saint Anselm and Gaunilo’s “The Ontological Argument”, Anselm believes that God is the greatest of all conceivable things and nothing else can be ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Analyse The Reasoning Of The Ontological Argument As Presented By Anselm
    • 1305 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analyse The Reasoning Of The Ontological Argument As Presented By Anselm

    Anselm’s argument here can be described as reductio ad absurdum. Essentially his argument takes something in his head, in this case a being that than which nothing greater can be conceived, then he makes a further assertion about existing in reality being better than existing in the understanding alone. Therefore if God is a being that than which nothing greater can be conceived, and to exist in reality is greater to exist in the understanding alone, God must by definition exist in reality. That is the logic behind Anselm’s first argument.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anselm Vs Kant's Empiricism
    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anselm Vs Kant's Empiricism

    Out of the two arguments presented by Anselm and Aquinas the one that makes the most sense to me is Aquinas. I think this because, unlike Anselm, Aquinas believes that people will never be able to fully grasp an understanding of “God’s nature” through reason alone. In my opinion Anselm is a mix between Locke's Empiricism and Kant's Structuralism. On the other hand Aquinas is more along the lines of someone who practices Plato's Dualism, and Descartes' Rationalism.…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Teleological Argumentative Analysis
    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Teleological Argumentative Analysis

    Throughout the course of time, many philosophers, dogmatic religions and even individual human beings themselves have tried to prove the existence of God. The recurrent question that constantly arises is whether or not you can prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking alone. To that, the answer is no. It is not possible to prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking as you also need to incorporate aspects of faith, but rational thinking helps solidify your beliefs pertaining to God and leaves the answers we cannot conceive rationally up to faith. You cannot understand something outside of your existence rationally because you cannot experience it or see it; you can only theorize, believe and trust in it. You will never be able to reason what you have no knowledge of. In this essay, I will argue that in…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anslem: Intro to Philosophy
    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anslem: Intro to Philosophy

    Anselm’s ontological argument focuses on the notion that God exists. He defines God as being one “that than which no greater can be conceived.” If God is defined as the greatest being, he emphasizes nothing can be imagined greater than God. Anselm believes that if an individual understands the definition of God, than God exists in the understanding of that person. It is greater to exist in reality than in the mind alone. Anselm illustrates this point with the image of a painter. He questions whether a picture someone has thought about painting is greater than one they have actually painted. If God exists only as an idea in the mind, than it’s possible to imagine something that is greater than God. Anselm believes that would be contradicting the definition of God. Anselm states that anyone who understands and accepts the definition of God can come to conclusion that God exists both in the mind and in actual reality. From Anslem’s reasoning, one then could conclude that God does exist.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ontological And Cosmological Argument
    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page

    Ontological And Cosmological Argument

    The ontological, cosmological, and teleological arguments collectively strive to prove one point, the existence of God. Ontological arguments lean on reasoning to prove its point of an a priori being or existence. Cosmological arguments focus on the idea that because there is this vast universe with an infinite amount of galaxies, God or a higher being, must have had a hand in creating the world and universe we live in. Teleological arguments emphasize on the idea that the universe was created solely to carry out the purpose or end result that it was designed for by…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ontological Argument
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Ontological Argument

    Anselm defines God as a being “that than which no greater can be conceived.” He argues that, whatever can be understood exists in the mind and that the concept of God can be understood, so God exists in the mind. Anselm then tries to prove that God also exists in reality and not only in the mind. The first premises states “assume that God only exists in the mind and not in reality.” The second premises positions “but then a greater being than God can be thought.” Finally, we can conclude “but God was defined as a being that than which nothing greater can be conceived; so, no greater than God can be thought.” The second and last premises that “a greater being than God can be thought” and “no greater than God can be thought” are contradictions. Therefore, our original assumption that God only exists in reality must be false. Anselm implies that only a fool would deny God’s existence. He questions, “Why, then, has the fool said in his heart, there is no God (Psalms XIV. 1), since it is so evident, to a rational mind, that you do exist in the highest degree of all? Why, except that he is…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Ontological Argument Analysis

    Is there a God? This is a question that crosses the minds of everyone in the world, at least once. While this question is highly controversial, the world must come to the realization that there is not one definite answer. This may seem confusing to most people, and the concept will probably never be fully grasped. But there are five particular philosophers who have formed strong opinions and arguments to address the question at hand and seem to have it all figured out. Philosophy and religion do indeed have an unsettled relationship, but this relationship only challenges minds, inspires people to think, and allows others to obtain a deeper and more detailed perspective.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ontological Argument
    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ontological Argument

    The ontological argument is an attempt to refute skepticism of God and prove His existence through reason alone. The philosopher, Saint Anselm, presented his work on the ontological argument, or argument from reason, in his text the Proslogium. The argument, on the surface, is very logically convincing and attempts to allure even the skeptic of God. Anselm tries to show the proposition of God exists based on analytic necessary truth – which will be discussed later in further detail. This paper will explain and assess the deductive and a priori nature of the argument, address the objections…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    NA Argumentative Analysis
    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NA Argumentative Analysis

    The topic of gun control is hotly debated today. 50 % of the population are for it, believing that having a gun provides them with protection. Because of various reasons the government aren’t able to protect us, which is why people look for other ways to stay safe. However a gun is still a weapon. Despite the fact that people want to have to be on the safe side there were many accidents were an innocent people end up hurt unintentionally. Since Obama took office in 2008 there’s been about 23 mass shootings (Grider, 2015), 62 shootings at schools, 12,223 people killed in gun incidents and 24, 722 people injured(Gunter, 2015). There’s been shootings in Washington D.C, North Carolina, California, etc.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anselmian Theism Research Paper
    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anselmian Theism Research Paper

    Anselmian theism is a set of beliefs having to do with the existence of God according to St. Anselm. The existence of God as explained by Anselmian theism: God exists in every possible world and thus in every possible situation. This definition of Anselmian theism relates very heavily with Anselm's definition of God which states, "That than which nothing greater can be conceived". Anselmian theism expresses that God is ever present and exists in every situation in every world.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics