Ankle Injury Essay
Intro to Athletic Training
Ankle injuries are very common among athletes in every sport. Many people believe that different ways help you heal from an ankle injury. This article, A Systematic Review on the Treatment of Acute Ankle Sprain: Braces versus Other Functional Treatment Types, explains its results in testing these methods.
Their methods were to take a large number of people with an acute ankle sprain and see if there was a difference between a brace and other functional methods. This study showed that between the methods of treatment there was “no evidence” classified for a reoccurrence for an ankle sprain or injury. Also measured in this study were residual complaints associated with ankle injuries. Those three areas were pain, swelling, and stability. In all three areas, each of the five studies proved a “no evidence” for the effect of an …show more content…
Three high-quality studies were used for the sports section. Out of the three groups that tested the ankle braces versus Tubigrip, only one had found significant percent of people that used an ankle brace returned to playing sports a lot sooner than the ones that used the Tubigrip. Even though one group found results for that test, the other two did not find any significant evidence to prove that an ankle brace was better than Tubigrip. This lead to the conclusion of "no evidence" in this study. As for the results of returning to work, six studies or groups were used to determine which is better. Only two out of the six groups found that an ankle brace returned the injured to work on average of four days sooner than elastic bandage. Since only two out of six came up with significant results, it is less than fifty percent which resulted in a "no evidence" classification. The test of returning to daily activities resulted in a "no evidence" classification also even though only one group did the
Ankle injuries are very common among athletes in every sport. Many people believe that different ways help you heal from an ankle injury. This article, A Systematic Review on the Treatment of Acute Ankle Sprain: Braces versus Other Functional Treatment Types, explains its results in testing these methods.
Their methods were to take a large number of people with an acute ankle sprain and see if there was a difference between a brace and other functional methods. This study showed that between the methods of treatment there was “no evidence” classified for a reoccurrence for an ankle sprain or injury. Also measured in this study were residual complaints associated with ankle injuries. Those three areas were pain, swelling, and stability. In all three areas, each of the five studies proved a “no evidence” for the effect of an …show more content…
Three high-quality studies were used for the sports section. Out of the three groups that tested the ankle braces versus Tubigrip, only one had found significant percent of people that used an ankle brace returned to playing sports a lot sooner than the ones that used the Tubigrip. Even though one group found results for that test, the other two did not find any significant evidence to prove that an ankle brace was better than Tubigrip. This lead to the conclusion of "no evidence" in this study. As for the results of returning to work, six studies or groups were used to determine which is better. Only two out of the six groups found that an ankle brace returned the injured to work on average of four days sooner than elastic bandage. Since only two out of six came up with significant results, it is less than fifty percent which resulted in a "no evidence" classification. The test of returning to daily activities resulted in a "no evidence" classification also even though only one group did the