Preview

Animal Testing Methods

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1201 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Testing Methods
Over the past few centuries scientists have tried to solve the mysteries of disease through a plethora of different testing methods. The most popular method that is in effect presently is animal based tests. While these tests are the most commonly used, are they the best in terms of morality and accuracy? Animal tests inflict forms of torture upon defenseless creatures in order to discover the solution to medical problems. Testing animals provide, for the most part, inaccurate results, while cheaper and more moral alternatives exist. If the scientific community funded research on alternative testing methods instead of animal tests, we could do away with the inhumane animal tests and move on to more accurate testing methods that do not …show more content…
If you compare the DNA of humans to the DNA of chimpanzees, you will notice that they are ninety-nine percent similar. Why would scientists pursue alternative methods when test subjects that are very genetically similar are available. Chimpanzees’ bodies react to medical drugs and treatments similarly to humans’ bodies because of these genetic similarities. With that being said, it is reasonable for scientists to think that animals with similar DNA strands will yield accurate results. Scientists use chimpanzees to test drugs because the areas of the body affected are similar to those of human’s. If cosmetics are being tested, other animals are used as test subjects. For instance, rabbits are used to test the effects certain products have on the eyes. This is because rabbit eyes respond similarly to chemicals that irritate the eyes as human eyes do. By using animals with body parts that are similar to the human version of that body part, scientists are able to achieve accurate …show more content…
Animal testing is not essential for us to test new drugs. There is no definitive proof that animal testing was required to discover some of its finest breakthroughs. For instance, we could test the effects of drugs on human cells in petri dishes instead, and possibly get more accurate results. This method may yield more accurate results than animal tests, simply because it utilizes human cells. Another testing method we have is virtual computer models of human body parts. They are able to predict the possible outcomes a drug could have on a human without endangering an animal to see how it could possibly affect a human. Both of these methods are more cost efficient than animal tests and show great promise. While these are the two best alternatives we have at this moment in time, the future holds great potential in drug testing for mankind. Science is on its way to discovering how to create synthetic organs. Once this is achieved animals will no longer be needed to test drugs. Artificial organs would show scientists exactly how certain drugs affect the human body and if they are safe for people to use. The use of these organs would revolutionize how we test medicines and leave very little, if any room for unreliable

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in U.S. labs every year.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing - 18

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Regulatory agencies across the globe make it mandatory for companies to get their 'products' tested for toxicity before making them available in the market. These 'products', which range from prescription drugs to cosmetics, are tested on animals to check for the degree of skin irritation, skin penetration, eye irritation, carcinogenicity, etc. On the basis of these tests, it is determined whether the said product is fit for human use or not.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Inaccurate

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It might not be efficient at testing medicine because you will want to see how it affects human organs but you can also grow cells which is a lot more expensive but you can selectively choose what cells you want to grow like liver or muscle cells of anything. With this possibility the only reason to keep animal testing would be because of greed. “skin corrosivity and irritation can be easily measured using three-dimensional human skin equivalent systems such as EpiDerm and SkinEthic. Additional alternatives include EpiSkin (a model of reconstructed human epithelium) and a variety of sophisticated, computer-based Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) models that predict skin corrosivity and irritation by means of correlating a new drug or chemical with its likely activity, properties, and effects with classification accuracy between 90 and 95 percent”(NEAVS,…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is rarely successful since animals have different physiologies than humans. There has been many studies that have shown inaccuracy and unsuccess in animal testing. Studies show, “90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in clinical trials” (Stop Animal Testing) and also, “Animal-tested drugs have killed, disabled or harmed millions of people and lead to costly delays as well” (Stop Animal Testing). It is evident that animal testing lacks accuracy and has dangerous consequences, therefore it should no longer be…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that animals are the next best thing to a “whole-body” system, but animals have no say in what happens to them, thus making them the best thing to a whole-body system. Humans have a whole-body system as well, but no tests are done on them, because they have a say so. However, what people in the society do not know, is that animals are not the same as humans which then leads to inaccurate test data and false information. “94 percent of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials.” (Animal Testing) This quote clearly states that testing on animals is innacurate, giving humans false information and proving that it is completely pointless and inhumane. There are many different ways to perform tests without using animals. Scientists are using bacteria and petri dishes and comparing and contrasting and finding out more information than they ever have by harming the…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the topic of animal testing, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether it helps researchers to find new drugs and treatments suitable for humans. Whereas some are convinced that it does help researchers find new drugs and treatments, others maintain that some drugs tested on animals may never actually be useful or even safe for human consumption. In my own view the results of animals testing are unreliable because animals and humans are not genetically or anatomically alike to one another.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Animal Testing Essay

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In fact, nearly 50 non-animal tests have been validated for use for, cosmetics and animal testers can use computer models. There are many alternatives, so why don’t we use them? There probably less expensive too. Also cosmetics could use ingredients that are already known to be safe. Cosmetics could use those ingredients that probably would be more reliable than testing on innocent animals. Equally important Europe has led the way by banning all animal testing in cosmetic products. Europe has chosen a more human path, at least for cosmetics why don’t we join them? Clearly There is an…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Researchers need to test medicine using advanced technology not on animals. All researchers around the world need to find a safer more accurate way to test medication. If researchers keep using animals, their results will always be different for humans and they will never find a solution that will help people with their health. There are ways to test medication that are safer, faster, and cheaper than animal testing. If researchers use the technology animal testing will be eliminated from…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is it wrong to experiment on animals for our own benefit? Many may disagree and believe its immoral and shouldnt be done. Science and manufacturing need animal experimentation to prevent harm to humans because it helps to develope cures for disease and to save humans from experimentation.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pro Animal Testing

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One important factor to consider is the issue on morality. I do agree that sometimes, animal testing can be cruel. But wouldn't testing new drugs on people be even more cruel? Wouldn't it be more cruel for them to die of the tests because there isn't enough information about a drug? Also, are not millions of animals killed yearly for food and other merchandise? In my opinion, medical research is a more justifiable death than feeding stomachs or sustaining the fashion industry. With the issue of cruelty at hand, it should be known that scientists care about the welfare of the animals being tested on. The testing is done under strict supervision and the law protects the animals from cruelty and mistreatment, so animal testing doesn't really entail animal…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Approximately, more than 115 million animals worldwide are used in laboratory experiments every year (Humane Society International, 2010). Animals, from the fruit fly to the mouse, are widely used in scientific research. Research is critical for the advancement of medicine, leading to increased chances of survival from diseases and improved strategies to prevent them. Without animal experiments, transplants, diseases, cancer, and vaccines would not have been advanced. The use of animals can be inevitable, particularly in conditions that require first-hand understanding of biochemical processes in and outside the body. Therefore, animals should be used for scientific research.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The testing of cosmetics, household cleaners, and surprisingly, dog food, results in millions of animals suffering and dying from poisoning and burning every year, at the demand of cruel Corporations.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever thought what goes into making your makeup, shampoo, medicine and even your toothpaste? At some point in their development these products may have been applied to the eyes and skin of live animals. Animal testing has been used as a mechanism in the advancement of cosmetics, medicine, and many everyday products (Moxley). Animal testing is a highly controversial topic that has divided people into groups that are against it or support animal testing (Klazema).…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    American Animal Testing

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Economist article, “Be Nice to Mice… Animal Testing,” notes that only one in every ten drugs tested on animals actually works on humans. This is because they are fed a lot to keep their bodies warm since they are kept in cool conditions. The cool conditions are said to keeps their temper at bay. But eating as much as they do alters the way they metabolize the drug. There are many different factors that are involved that make animal testing results difficult to translate into a hypothesis for what human results would be. James-Enger, author of Vegetarian Times article “Beyond Animal Testing,” states that using animals to predict how humans will react to the same drug or medical treatment is not a good experiment due to the difference in anatomy between humans and animals. Even testing animals with similar DNA, like chimpanzees, is not a good test because they do not react the same way as humans. For example, chimps, being our closest relatives, still did not contract AIDS when introduced to the HIV virus (Kelly). Another faulty test occurred when testing a drug called fenphen. Animals showed no serious side effects, but when tested on humans it caused heart-valve defects and was taken off the market (Kelly). There are quite a few recalls due to the inaccuracy of animal experimentation. It has also been prevalent that many tests have been over tested for no…

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Each year in the United States, an estimated seventy million animals are hurt and killed in the name of science by private institutions, household products and cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and scientific centers. Animal testing is wrong and downright mean. Innocent animals should not be treated badly and caused pain for the sake of a human 's safety. Many people think animal testing is good while others think it is wrong. I think it is completely and absolutely wrong. Some people argue that humans are not necessarily superior to animals, so why should animals be experimented on and made to suffer to protect human beings? Do you know what animal testing is, what condition the animals live in, and what some alternatives to testing animals are?…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays