Preview

Animal Experimentation Is Wrong

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1063 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Experimentation Is Wrong
Everyone knows the difference between right and wrong , and some of the wrong brings good outcomes .Debating between getting new products that are beneficial for our health ,and fighting against the use of animals to get the products that everyone at the end will use. Animal experimentation is wrong because it has a lot of facts animals have rights no matter what kind of animal is ,in laboratories they’re treated badly and used more than once by different products. Scientist and studies have proved that animals live in constant distress and pain and that more than 1,000 thousand of animals died for each experiment . Many of the deaths caused by the experimentation were unnecessary.People think that a life of a person is more …show more content…
A 2006 study in JAMA [Journal of the American Medical Association] concluded that, "patients and physicians should remain cautious about extrapolating the findings of prominent animal research to the care of human disease," and that "even high-quality animal studies will replicate poorly in human clinical research."(Dvorsky George).This demonstrates that if they continue to do experiments on animals that they know the data would not be accurate, if scientists create new cells people will refuse to the use of the new technological research because not animal experimentation nor technological advancements will be enough and accurate to human well . Consequently, there will be a change in the data of research because people have always relied on animal experimentation this change would take years ,even though the U.S military , universities ,and private companies that are using virtual simulated human skin cell to increase the accuracy of technology. To implement the plan that William Russell and Rex Burch …show more content…
In both cases the animal usage is cruel and a horrible practice they should get rid of both. This might be consider as hypocrisy because we’re against it ,but we still know that we won’t stop using the products that the animals have suffered and died from , we still need them we can’t live without it.Satisfaction and ambition are what make us cruel ,we need accurate products for the human to feel healthy. If people feels great with a product ,they tend to buy more of it , and from it get economic resources to replace billions of dollars spent on healthcare and medical researches. If the government approves a law against animals experimentation and poultry , how are they going to bring more income if the people are use to the norms they have seen , since they got memory and knowing that people are conservatives

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Imagine a young girl, sitting in her dinning room with her loving family. She is about to partake in her mother’s famous lasagna, when suddenly, huge creatures burst into the room and grab the little girl and her family. The leering eyed creatures stuff the innocent family into cages, too small for their bodies, and shove them into vans. As the girl’s last days roll by she watches both herself and her family being treated like “tens of millions of animals hidden in laboratories on college campuses and research facilities being dissected, infected, injected, gassed, burned and blinded.” (“The truth about…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing Satire

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the first place, animals are being killed after testing, which is considered immoral in today’s society. We are killing innocent animals for our benefits when there are other alternatives, such as computer stimulations, to choose from. Moreover, these same animals can be in a lovable family instead of a deadly lab. We all know life is valuable. You only get one shot at it. If it is so valuable, then why take away the life of innocent animals? Don’t they deserve a chance at life, too? Animals being killed after testing isn’t the only reason this problem must be eradicated, but also because it…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal experimentation saves lives and makes vaccines for diseases. But, millions of animals die for experimentation and it doesn’t work every time, even people die because of false information. Animals are important in their habitats and kingdoms. If people take them, then they can't do their jobs. Animal experimentation is not needed for us because of how many animals die for it and how many false procedures there are that also kill people.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, everything about animal testing is very unethical and immoral. Many people are aware that animal testing goes on, but most people don't know the extremes that scientists will go to for research purposes. The sad truth is that if most people actually…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Ethics

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It is not morally acceptable for scientists to use live animals in research for medicine that can be used to cure humans. Today we continue to use animals in experiments to learn more about health problems that affect both humans and animals and to ensure the safety of new medical treatments. Now that we know the purpose of animal testing, is it really worth killing millions of innocent animals? This practice is morally wrong and inconsiderate of us for letting this happen. People should stop using animals as experiment subjects and utilize the advance technology that we have now. This is happening because we are letting it happen! We have to start by educating others on this issue because the lack of knowledge on animal testing is why people…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research shows that 26 million animals have been used for testing of all different kinds. 26 million animals have been put through wringer for the sake of a human. 26 million animals have had no say, defense, or chance to save themselves. Animals are used as human experiments to see if a certain product can work or not. Animal testing is wrong on many different levels. If humans are not willing to use, test and experiment on themselves, why should one be allowed to test on an animal who has no say in what happens.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Your lipstick is to die for. Literally. Right now, millions of mice, rabbits, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are locked inside cages across the country waiting for the next painful and terrifying experiment to be performed on them. Before we conduct another experiment, we need to consider our treatment of others, both humans and non-humans. Animal testing is a form of animal cruelty that is no longer necessary or acceptable. There are many alternatives to animal testing that still ensure that the product is safe for humans. In addition to this, different species react differently to the same substances, so the tests aren't always accurate.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to some national statistics, nearly two-thirds of all animal research has little or nothing to do with curing human diseases or advancing human medicine. Animals testing prolong the suffering of people waiting for effective cures by misleading experimenters in the wrong direction, and wasting resources that could have been spent on more relevant research. Humans and animals may have brains, hearts, lungs, arteries, kidneys, and so on; but animals bodies are made up differently. Dogs for example, they walk on all fours; humans do not use four legs to walk. So to do an experiment that deals with animals legs compared to human leg would be a wasteful matter, dogs legs are formatted different.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each year, more than 100 million animals are killed in lab for product testing. Now a days, scientists are using animals for their research and testings, and I disagree with the use of animals. It is unfair to animals because in the end it kills them, it may not actually work on humans, and the cost of it.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For centuries, animals have been used in medical research. Since 1875, animal experimentation has been an on going debate on whether experiments…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many of the new alternatives methods can range from using 3-D models of the human body or even using real life human subjects which can be donated for the use of science. A skin equivalent can be comparable to the natural skin of humans and therefore it is an alternative method to animal testing (Mertsching, Weimer, Kersen, & Brunner, 1/4). The Authors indicate that the skin equivalent is generated out of human keratinocytes on a collagen substrate containing human dermal fibroblast (Mertching et al., 2/4). For the alternative method, it allows for applications of testing of an array of drugs and products used for daily life without using animals and produce accurate results because of how close the resemblance is and the biological structure to humans. Some of the test they can do on the skin can be used for testing the various parts of the body and different symptoms. With animal testing coming under fire and criticism scientists try to find ways to not use animals. A different approach of animal testing was taken by Unilever in collaboration with Entelos Inc. Which is a computer based-mathematical model (Vandebriel, & Loveren 397). The use of a computer based models will help obtain the understandings of the tests the scientists do without using any animals. With computers they can create a model of the human body and use the info they gathered to construct a model that will be accurate when testing. They can also get info about the knowledge gap also they will be able to integrate the different ways using the alternative testing data. With the data they can put together the info they gathered with the other testing methods to make a model on the computer that will be more…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that people should stop testing products on animals. If they want to test new products they should test it on humans. Testing these products on animals can kill them. They need to find something else to test products on other than animals. Other people think that's its fine to test products on animals. People shouldn't test these products on animals. I disagree with Animal Experimentation. Millions of these animals suffer and die from this. Testing these products on animals can blind them. Testing these products on animals can affect the population of certain breeds. Why do they test products on animals? They test these products on animals so they don't have to test it on humans, but i think that it would be better if they tested it on humans who volunteered to test these products instead of some innocent animal.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Is Wrong

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Animal experimentation is not only cruel, but expensive as well. Thankfully, there are accurate, cheaper and quicker alternatives. First, there are the In vitro tests which are used to diagnose disease or health of patients using the patient's blood sample or body tissue. Another is microdosing, where humans are given low quantities of a product to test the effects on the body, without affecting the whole body system.There are also many computerized patient-drug databases, virtual drug trials, and stem cell and genetic testing methods. The United States alone spends about $16 billion dollars every year, coming from taxpayers, for animal experimentation. Just think about how much money the US could save if it abolished animal testing as a whole. The US has been in debt and in a depression for years, yet it continues to throw money down the toilet just to torture and kill animals. Animals are NOT the only way to test…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine being scared for your life everyday, not understanding why all day long needles are being stuck in you, or even being shoved into a small space with hundreds of other animals from the same species. People should not test on animals because animal tests are mortally wrong and inhumane, it can permanently injure, and ultimately animal testing can kill.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, while many see animal testing as a valuable way to spend taxpayer’s money due to it providing helpful information toward human health, it is simply not true. Animal experimentation has been proven to be economically deficient, too much for too little. For example, PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), emphasizes that every year, “The U.S, animal experimentation gobbles up billions of dollars”. This is essentially wasted money to find “new cures” for many diseases. With all the funds being used on medical research by animal experimentation, why is the US ranked 49th for life expectancy? With all the money being used to experiment, wouldn’t you think we would be ranked higher? Too much money is being spent on torturing…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays