A 2006 study in JAMA [Journal of the American Medical Association] concluded that, "patients and physicians should remain cautious about extrapolating the findings of prominent animal research to the care of human disease," and that "even high-quality animal studies will replicate poorly in human clinical research."(Dvorsky George).This demonstrates that if they continue to do experiments on animals that they know the data would not be accurate, if scientists create new cells people will refuse to the use of the new technological research because not animal experimentation nor technological advancements will be enough and accurate to human well . Consequently, there will be a change in the data of research because people have always relied on animal experimentation this change would take years ,even though the U.S military , universities ,and private companies that are using virtual simulated human skin cell to increase the accuracy of technology. To implement the plan that William Russell and Rex Burch …show more content…
In both cases the animal usage is cruel and a horrible practice they should get rid of both. This might be consider as hypocrisy because we’re against it ,but we still know that we won’t stop using the products that the animals have suffered and died from , we still need them we can’t live without it.Satisfaction and ambition are what make us cruel ,we need accurate products for the human to feel healthy. If people feels great with a product ,they tend to buy more of it , and from it get economic resources to replace billions of dollars spent on healthcare and medical researches. If the government approves a law against animals experimentation and poultry , how are they going to bring more income if the people are use to the norms they have seen , since they got memory and knowing that people are conservatives