Preview

Anheuser-Busch and Campbell Taggart

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1703 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anheuser-Busch and Campbell Taggart
I. INTRODUCTION Anheuser-Busch Company was in the verge of fulfilling their diversification strategy. They were negotiating for the acquisition of Campbell Taggart, opting to pay $570 million for the said company. The acquisition was pretty much successful until the Securities and Exchange Committee started an investigation regarding the unusual activity of the Campbell Taggart Stock. There is a speculation that there was Insider Trading of the Campbell Taggart stock. Evidences lead that Mr. Paul Thayer, an executive of Anheuser-Busch, has leaked information to his friends about the acquisition of Campbell Taggart.

The legal counsel of Anheuser-Busch is now facing the decision of filing a suit against one of its former executives.

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Anheuser-Busch Company acquired Campbell Taggart Incorporated to fulfill their diversification strategy. The merger was accomplished flawlessly, until the SEC informed Anheuser-Busch that they were investigating unusual activity of the Campbell Taggart stocks because they were speculating that Insider Trading have taken place.

Mr. Walter Suhre, Vice President and General Counsel of Anheuser-Busch Company was contemplating whether to file a suit against Mr. Paul Thayer, a company executive who allegedly leaked material information to his friends about the acquisition, or to opt for out-of-the-court settlement.

This study focuses on the financial impact of the alleged Insider Trading to the acquisition of Campbell Taggart.

This study have come up with the suggestion that Anheuser-Busch should file a suit against Mr. Paul Thayer.

III. COMPANY HISTORY Anheuser-Busch is the nation’s leading brewer of light, premium, and super-premium beers. Expensive European hops and beechwood-chip aging in eleven breweries across the country distinguish Anheuser-Busch beers such as Budweiser, Michelob, and Busch from much of their competition. Although principally a brewer, Anheuser-Busch has diversified, via

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Whole Foods

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Using the concepts of instrumental values and terminal values, explain John Mackey’s blogging behavior relative to the Wild Oats acquisition. Using the same concepts explain the reaction of the SEC, FTC, and interested observers to Mackey’s blogging behavior.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bear Stearns Case Summary

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    takeover activity. The firm was very adept at disguising takeovers until the last minute. Its ability…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On December 27, 2001, Martha Stewart made a decision that changed her life, and the decision jeopardized the livelihood of her stakeholders. Ms. Stewart received a call from her stockbroker’s assistant letting her know that Dr. Samuel Waksal was trying to sell his holdings in ImClone. Dr. Waksal was the chief executive officer and founder of ImClone, and he had just received notice from the Food and Drug Administration that the drug Erbitux did not receive approval to be used as a cancer drug. Stock in ImClone was at a high due to expectations of Erbitux getting approval, and once the news of it not getting it reached the public, Dr. Waksal knew that the price of its stock was going to decline. (Carroll & Buchholtz, 2009, p. 814) This is an example of insider trading. “Anytime a company executive or employee buys or sells stock in the company that person works for, an inside trade has occurred.” (Newkirk, 1998) In this essay I will explore who the ‘insiders’ were that knew that the stock was in danger, and the people who did not know. I will examine how Martha Stewart’s decision affected her company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia,…

    • 2450 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mebel Doran & Company

    • 801 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The CEO of Mebel Doran & Company, Harvey Hegarty found out the M&A group of his Company had consulted the arbitrage desk about few specifics of Knox Corporation. The M&A and the arbitrage group would consult each other at times in order to structure effective financial strategies for the client, however, when inquired with the arbitrage group, the CEO found out that the arbitrageurs within the Company used to be in touch with other arbitragers in the market for information on any deals happening in the market, had got an enquiry about the Power Tie Corporation deal, which wasn’t handled well by the…

    • 801 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A famous corporate blunder that came to mind was the joint venture between Anheuser-Busch a multinational organization formerly a U.S. own brewery that held 45 percent of the US beer market and Grupo Modelo a Mexican company that brews the popular beer Corona that held 50 percent of its home beer market and exported to 124 countries in the globe. Anheuser originally entered into the venture with Modelo with the thought that the partnership would yield them profit and the access to the distribution of a major imported beer the Corona which was experiencing exponential growth in the US beer market. Anheuser’s venture was a purchase of 17.7 percent stake into Grupo Modelo for $477 million in 1993 with a contracted option to increasing its share to 50.2 percent. Unfortunately for Anheuser, Modelo backed door them with a renewed deal for ten years with its existing US distributor slashing the hopes of Anheuser to gain the exclusive brand rights to distribute in the US.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This essay will explain the following four questions. First, would registration with the SEC be required for Dakota Gasworks securities? Second, Did Emerson violate Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5? Third what theory or theories might a court use to hold Wallace liable for insider trading? Finally, under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, who would be required to certify the accuracy of financial statements filed with the SEC?…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When assessing the economic damage to due to Paul Thayer and those that he tipped off about the acquisition of Campbell Taggart, it should be noted that some argue that this kind of insider trading circulates information and forces the stock to its “true value.” If we assume this argument to be flawed, then part of Anheuser-Busch stock dip after the announcement was due to the insider trading and the fact Anheuser-Busch probably paid more to acquire its target. Thayer and his friends trade the Campbell stock for nearly a month before any public announcement of the merger. On July 27 nearly half the volume was insider volume controlled by those individuals who were in violation of rule 14(e)-3 (See exhibit 2). The increased volume might have caused other investors to begin to look and make stock plays on Campbell. In theory if you keep buying a stock the price will eventually go up. That basic principle would apply here. According to Exhibit 5, Campbell Taggart had nearly 16 million issued shares. If you add up all the shares purchased by Thayer and co-defendants, listed in Exhibit 8, the insiders purchased over 113,200 shares inside of a month. Those purchases and increased volume could have caused a pre-mature spike in the stock price of the target company forcing Anheuser-Busch to pay more than it should have. In then month preceding the announcement, the target company’s stock price rose $2.63 per share. Multiply that by 15 million shares that Anheuser-Busch bought out right and there is a potentially nearly $40 million price difference that could have been attributed to insider trading.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LaThis article found in the Wall Street Journal applies to insider trading. Thomas Conradt and David Weishaus bought shares of SPSS Inc. after illegally discovering about their near future acquisition of IBM. They believe Conradt was informed by his roommate at the time in 2009. Conradt then informed Weishaus but asked him to keep quiet claiming “we gotta keep this in the family” and “I don’t want to go to jail”. The two men were arrested last Thursday, November 29, 2012. It is believed that Conradt, Weishaus and three other brokers made more than one million dollars from the information. They each face up to twenty years in prison.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Due to the choices that London made and lack of judgmental and unethical behavior, the firms that were compromised suffered the most. Sketchers and Herbalife not only lose their auditing firm due to London, but had to obtain a new firm and restate…

    • 1099 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individual Project Unit 5

    • 797 Words
    • 3 Pages

    McLean, B., & Elkind, P. (2004). Smartest Guy in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of Enron (2th ed.). Portfolio Trade.…

    • 797 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    JAMAICA WATER PROPERTIES

    • 2175 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This case focuses on David Sokol, an executive who has made a “name” for himself in recent years within the energy industries. After becoming recognized as a successful “turnaround” agent for troubled companies, Sokol was hired in 1992 to serve as the chief operating officer of JWP, Inc., a large, New York-based conglomerate. At the time, JWP had an impressive history of sustained profits and revenue growth that was being threatened by the company’s far-flung operations and unwieldy organizational structure. Unknown to Sokol, JWP’s impressive operating results over the prior few years had been embellished by the company’s CFO and several of his top subordinates. Because of Sokol’s reputation for being a “hands-on” executive who insisted on personally obtaining a thorough understanding of his employer’s financial affairs, the CFO attempted to conceal misrepresentations in JWP’s accounting records from Sokol.…

    • 2175 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mebel Doran and Company

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Moreover on the investigation, He found that arbitrageur contacted and used another securities firm to speculate the price of Power-Tie stock over the week after he had information about this merger and acquisition and before this issue is came up.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inside Trading

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this case number (2012-255) concerning Insider Trading Ring Investment Banker Illegal Tips on Impending Merger on Dec 5, 2012. The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged an investment banker who was primarily based in Charlotte, N.C., and nine others involved in an insider trading ring that garnered more than $11 million in illicit profits trading on confidential information about impending mergers (SEC, 2012). John W. Femenia misused his position at Wells Fargo Securities to obtain material, nonpublic information about four separate merger transactions involving firm clients (SEC, 2012). Upon learning inside information about an impending deal, Femenia’s first call to set the insider trading ring in motion was typically to his longtime friend Shawn C. Hegedus, who worked as a registered broker (SEC, 2012). Femenia and Hegedus illegally tipped other friends who in turn tipped more friends or family members in a ring that spread across five states (SEC, 2012). This case related to the one from text reading because he had confidential information that he used to make a profit for himself and if the stockholders as well as partner are not given this information it can’t be legally used. In an important legal case, U.S. vs. O’Hagen, the Supreme Court clarified insider trad- ing law (Lawrence, A.T. and Weber, J. 2011). The court ruled that someone who traded on the basis of inside information when he or she knew the information was supposed to remain confidential was guilty of misappropriation, whether or not the trader was directly connected to the company whose shares were purchased (Lawrence, A.T. and Weber, J. 2011).…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    homie

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The case discusses the accounting frauds committed by the leading US telecommunications giant, WorldCom during the 1990s that led to its eventual bankruptcy. The case provides a detailed description of the growth of WorldCom over the years through its policy of mergers and acquisitions. The case explains the nature of the US telecommunications market, highlighting the circumstances that put immense pressure on companies to project a healthy financial position at all times. The case provides an insight into the ways by which WorldCom manipulated its financial statements. The case also describes the events that led the company to file for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in 2002. The role of the company's top management in the scandal has also been discussed. Finally, the case explores the initiatives being taken by the company to change its management structure, improve its performance and restore investor confidence. She said she took her concerns to Scott Sullivan, WorldCom's finance chief at the time, who told her Ebbers did not want to lower Wall Street expectations. Asked how she chose which accounts to alter, Vinson testified, "I just really pulled some out of the air. I used some spreadsheets.” She said during trial that she hoped to avoid prison time. "Ms. Vinson was among the least culpable members of the conspiracy at WorldCom," Jones said. Still, she said, "Had Ms. Vinson refused to do what she was asked, it's possible this conspiracy might have been nipped in the bud." In MS. Vinson shoes would keep it to myself because they don’t care how long and what you did your still going to jail.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cadbury vs Kraft

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The biggest mergers&takeovers: financial background In our presentation we’re going to tell you about the takeover of 1 big confectionery company.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics