Preview

Angel Breard Case Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
512 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Angel Breard Case Summary
After doing research on the Governor Glimore and the Execution of Angel Breard case, the conflict is mainly based upon the American Federal government, states’ rights, and international law. In this paper, I am going to address how the Federal Government affected the Breard case, the positions of conservatives and liberals viewing of global politics, and explain how the debate of the Hamilton and Jeffersonian federalism affects U.S foreign policy. I will discuss the winners and losers of the Breard case and sum it all up by asking if the United States of America handled this particular case wisely and properly.
To start this off we need to know what exactly is a Westphalian System. A Westphalian System has three main points: “The principle of state sovereignty, equality of states, and non-intervention of one states international affairs of another.” (Safonova, Sasha) On April 14th, 1998 Angel Breard, a citizen of the Paraguayan government, is being prosecuted for attempted murder and rape against a Virginia woman. The arresting authorities did not tell Breard that he had the option to contact the Paraguayan Consulate. He was found guilty by the state of Virginia. Breard then filed for an appeal in the federal court system stating that “His conviction sentence should be overturned because of the alleged violations of the Vienna Convention when the arresting authorities failed to inform him that, as a foreign national, he had the right to contact the Paraguayan Consulate” (LII, Legal Information Institute). The Vienna Convention is a treaty that started in 1961 and was enforced by the United Nations in
…show more content…
Conservatives is defined as “holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, in relation to politics or religion.” (Oxford, Dictionary). Free market and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Altgeld Case Summary

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Altgeld considers it his responsibility to seat the health and well being of the city’s inhabitants, and after numerous unsuccessful attempts at negotiating with Pullman, he decides to intervene for the good of the city’s people.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the article “Death, Reason, and Judgment: The American Experience”, which was posted on the ‘Filosofia Politica’ website (1), Ronald J. Allen (2) argues in a high academic level on the meaning and nature of errors in the imposition of capital punishment. Ronald J. Allen is the John Henry Wigmore Professor of Law at Northwestern University in Chicago. This paper will analyse and discuss the theories of the article and address two issues raised by Allen: the utilitarian and normative components of capital punishment, and the costs of errors of capital punishment.…

    • 2408 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apush Chapter 23 Summary

    • 3860 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Conservatives: the political group who wanted to restore a strong family, traditional religious values, patriotism, and limited government…

    • 3860 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be deliberate on the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has matured over the years. I will describe the beginning of the Habeas Corpus and the position it takes part in the U.S. and what recent act is being used. The United States Constitution must be more effectively unified into the Guantanamo methods to give equal civil rights to inmates despite what their nationality maybe, but to also have more cordial ways of reviewing obstructive servicemen to absolutely verify if they really should be treated as extremists that we should fear.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conservatism is greatly associated with the need to preserve traditions, beliefs, way of life and customs. Conservatism is also contrasted with fast-paced changes. It is now formally defined as believing in values that have been long established and the traditional practices in politics and society, as according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary. The realm of conservative ideology is broad and it covers everything from the most fundamental and basic belief to the values and practices in everyday life. As for Michael Oakeshott, in his work “On Being Conservative” in the book How Conservatives Think, edited and introduced by Phillip Wallenstein Buck, his writing speaks on the physical practices and the nature of conservatism while arguing that…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this essay i have addressed the issue of whether more states should enforce the death penalty. I have i have concentrated on ornellas argument, which concludes that the death penalty should be enforced by more states. I have stated both of her premises, which she uses to support her conclusion, and how they suffer from fallacies. I have concluded that her premises are unsuccessful in supporting the conclusion; therefore, making her entire argument unsuccessful. Lastly, i have provided an objection on Ornellas part, and showed how that was unsuccessful as…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Conservatism as a political belief signifies an amalgamation of political ideologies including fiscal conservatism, free market or economic liberalism, social conservatism and religious conservatism, It also includes a support for a strong military, small government, and states ' rights. The tactics of conservatism vary widely by place and time. But the most central feature of conservatism is deference: a psychologically internalized attitude on the part of the common people that the aristocracies are better people than they are. Modern-day liberals often theorize that conservatives use "social issues" as a way to mask economic objectives, but this is almost backward: the true goal of conservatism is to establish an aristocracy, which is a social and psychological condition of inequality. Economic inequality and regressive taxation, while certainly welcomed by the aristocracy, are best understood as a means to their actual goal, which is simply to be aristocrats. More generally, it is crucial to conservatism that the people must literally love the order that dominates them.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 7 Assignment

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this essay, I will be exploring the differences between state and federal jurisdiction in criminal prosecutions of murder with respect to crimes against persons. In the United States, both the states and the federal government have authority to prosecute criminal offenses. The federal government and each state have its own, court system, criminal statutes, prosecutors, and police agencies. Even if a particular crime will be prosecuted by a state or by the federal government will depend several factors.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Furman V. Georgia

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The main argument in this article is that the Supreme Court has failed in their duties to regulate the death penalty. This purported failure is attributed to the Supreme Court not following their own terms and their high-profile involvement in overseeing state and federal death penalty practices (Steiker & Steiker, 1998). The authors argue that the Court’s high profile involvement is in fact creating a “False but powerful impression that the death penalty practices have, in fact, been meaningfully transformed” (Steiker & Steiker, 1998, para. 4).…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4. The War and the Writ Habeas corpus and security in an age of terrorism…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror have all played a role throughout history. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power in the absence of the rule of law. The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States since terrorists are apprehended and deprived of due process. Habeas corpus is considered to be one of the most fundamental guarantees of personal liberty that we cherished as a country since the inception of our Constitution. However, debates have arisen regarding the proper use of habeas corpus making the focus be brought back in the past decade. Since September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on the United States, many people have been detained by the U.S. government as part of its war on terror. Many of these detainees face indefinite detention and have not yet been charged with a crime. The right of Habeas corpus overrules man’s interpretation and allows those accused federal and state court representation before a judge, or jury. The accusers deemed innocent until proven guilty, they have the right to representation, and appear in person for the charges brought forth. The purpose of this paper is to show how Habeas corpus came about, and its suspension by the United States. Also, the war on terror will be addressed along with the Supreme Court’s interpretation. Learning the history of Habeas corpus and how it works, allows us to see just how these laws are supposed to be carried out from our Constitution and not to be reconciled with.…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    On the subject of religion, conservatives do believe in a deity, or something similar of that nature. A deity could exist because of religious faith or simply because they do not trust human nature. By acknowledging God as a higher power, conservatives believe that this allows man and government to hold Him accountable for their actions and mistakes. And in doing so, this places a supreme law that “rules society as well as conscience, forging an eternal chain of right and duty which links great and obscure, living and dead.” (Story and Laurie, 47) which prevent man and government from having free reign. When government tries to implement laws that are contradictory to divine law, conservatives seek to challenge the validity of those said laws.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The question addressed by David Bruch’s May 20, 1985 article “The Death Penalty” from The New Republic regards whether capital punishment is just or unjust. In this article, Bruck believes that capital punishment is wrong and that Edward Koch misuses the issue. The tools used by Bruck to address this issue are ineffective.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The national and state governments work together to keep America’s federal government running smoothly, but the two often are in conflict over who has the final authority to decide policy in various areas. One example is which government should have the final say in whether or not a crime is severe enough to use capital punishment, also called the death penalty, which is the execution of a convicted criminal by the state as punishment for crimes known as capital crimes or capital offences (Cochran n.p.). The decision to use capital punishment should be left up to the state governments unless a federal offense is committed.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Harry S. Truman, the 33rd President of the United States, deployed the atomic bomb on Japan to ensure the end of the Pacific War with minimal US casualties. Upon rejection of the Potsdam Declaration and calls for unconditional surrender by the Japanese, the US in direct retaliation deployed the atomic weapon ‘Little Boy’ on the city of Hiroshima in August 6, 1945 and continued by bombing Nagasaki with ‘Fat Man’ on August 9th. The Allies had concluded the European front by capturing Berlin and defeating the remainder of Axis forces in May 1945. The Pacific front however remained and was different from combat in Europe; the ferocity of the Japanese to defend their homeland resulted in a higher level of casualties suffered by the US. Truman “never had any doubts… had felt no qualms, about the atomic bombings because they forced an end to the war and saved American lives.”Thus in an effort to conclude the Pacific War, Truman deployed the Atomic Bomb in order to end the war that entrenched US resources and manpower for over 5 years and as a simple bonus to increase the bargaining capability of the US against the Soviet Union.…

    • 2152 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays