Andrew Wyeth Analysis
The exhibition Andrew Wyeth: Looking Out, Looking In, on display at the National Gallery of Art, provides people with the opportunity to observe the original paintings of Andrew Wyeth. Andrew Wyeth is an American artist, known for being able to ensure the distinct spirit of his formally realist (abstract) artwork. As pointed out in the exhibition room “Wyeth’s watercolor studies are quickly executed to capture a momentary impression” (Andrew Wyeth). Even though, throughout the course of his life, Wyeth did enjoy a considerable popularity, as an artist, it is only today that his paintings are beginning to hold value more to the extent that they truly do deserve. Along with representing a high artistic value, Wyeth’s work also reference as intellectually
…show more content…
This type of art does not assume that, in order to be able to appreciate a particular work of art, people must be thoroughly knowledgeable of what happened to be the relevant ‘theory of art’. After all, there certainly can be a few doubts, as to what the actual illustration is in Wyeth’s paintings regardless of what happened to the arranged approach, on the artist’s part, in every individual case. This cannot result in anything else, but in prompting potentially exposed spectators to consider the idea that true art is enjoyable rather naturally than logically, something I relate well with, in this respect. Therefore, there is indeed a good motivation in recommending people to attend this exhibition. Wyeth’s paintings represent a creative value in itself. His paintings continue to hold valuable by those art-lovers, who understand that the word ‘art’ is in fact, synonymous with the word ‘genius.’ This exhibition is one of which is definitely seen as such that indicates that. As time goes on, people will grow increasingly attracted to the specifically classical methodology of artistic expression, which in turn assumes the eventual decline of abstract
This type of art does not assume that, in order to be able to appreciate a particular work of art, people must be thoroughly knowledgeable of what happened to be the relevant ‘theory of art’. After all, there certainly can be a few doubts, as to what the actual illustration is in Wyeth’s paintings regardless of what happened to the arranged approach, on the artist’s part, in every individual case. This cannot result in anything else, but in prompting potentially exposed spectators to consider the idea that true art is enjoyable rather naturally than logically, something I relate well with, in this respect. Therefore, there is indeed a good motivation in recommending people to attend this exhibition. Wyeth’s paintings represent a creative value in itself. His paintings continue to hold valuable by those art-lovers, who understand that the word ‘art’ is in fact, synonymous with the word ‘genius.’ This exhibition is one of which is definitely seen as such that indicates that. As time goes on, people will grow increasingly attracted to the specifically classical methodology of artistic expression, which in turn assumes the eventual decline of abstract