Preview

Andrew Jackson's Influence On The American Political System

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1216 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Andrew Jackson's Influence On The American Political System
No one can argue that as a President, Jackson made mistakes. Despite some of his poor decisions such as the Indian Removal Act, Andrew Jackson influenced the American Political System in a positive way during his presidency majority of the time. Andrew Jackson influenced the political system by introducing the idea of the “corrupt bargain” to the national government, he vetoed a bill during The Bank War and he used his idea of Jacksonian Democracy with the rule of his people.
In consequence to the Indian Removal Act of 1832, human rights of Native Americans were violated. “They were not treated as human beings and even considered ‘subordinate’ to the United States by Andrew Jackson in his defense of the Removal Policy in 1832.” It was taking away
…show more content…
“Removal politics often left the relocated tribes more divided and violent then they had been than they had been before their move.” They later called the shift West the “Trail of Tears” due to all of the Indian devastation along the way. “The conditions of the journey were so brutal that more than 4,000 Cherokees died in temporary detention camps and in transit. The action, as well as the events leading up to it, clearly signaled that the Cherokee people, and Native Americans in general, had no real protection under the U.S. Constitution. Consequently, they had little opportunity or incentive to participate in the growing U.S. economy, despite having been successful trading partners of European merchants in the eighteenth century.” Andrew Jackson defended the Indian Removal Act by listing the advantages for Americans and Native Americans. Jackson believed that if the Native Americans moved west it would be a good economic opportunity for the American government. As you can see, the Indian Removal Act shows us that Andrew Jackson was not looking out for the best of the American

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. This act called for the government to make treaties that required Native Americans to relocate west. Jackson thought that this policy was “just and liberal.” He thought the Native Americans would be able to keep their way of life. He was wrong. The Indian Removal Act brought a lot of hardship to the Native Americans. It also forever changed the relationship between whites and Native Americans. Before Jackson passed this act, he gave the Native Americans two choices. The two choices were that they could take on white culture and become citizens of the United States, or they could move to the Western territories and keep their…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many opinions on Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Policy was an act of cruelty or a fair policy, but the policy did not benefit Native Americans.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Native Americans lived east of the Mississippi river, they didn’t want to follow the law and be part of U.S. government and wanted to govern their own people. Andrew Jackson being a president of United States didn’t want the group to ignore the government therefore, proposed to move them west of the Mississippi river. In order to justify and keep threats away from the U.S. settlers, the U.S. government promised them bigger land, money, pay for their needs and support for one year as said in the excerpt from Indian Removal Act 1830 (source 1). This act should be justified because it resolved the conflicts between the U.S. and the Indies were given comparable land and support. In Source 2 Andrew Jackson makes a speech about if the Indians movie it will benefit the U.S. and make Alabama and Mississippi stronger.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Jackson came to power in 1829 he promised much, advocating equality, democratic change, morality in government and true representation. However Jackson's success or failure as a president is shown by what he actually did. The thesis of this essay is that despite the variety of issues faced by Jackson he didn't actually bring about much change. This could be interpreted as failure but his legacy as a strong president, as a symbol of US democracy, and also the devotion of the people to him, does perhaps counter the failings. Failure might constitute not meeting one's promises but Jackson's ambiguity and inconsistency on many issues make it hard to judge his performance. I would not say he was completely successful or unsuccessful but rather advocate a mixture of both.…

    • 2244 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Age of Jackson Dbq

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, dictating that all Indians living in the Deep South had to move to Eastern Oklahoma, because the Indians had something everyone else wanted, land. Jackson says in his First Inaugural Address,“It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people.” Jackson is saying that It will be his genuine and continuous desire towards the Indian tribes, and we want to give them a fair and open policy, and give humane and kind attention to their rights and their wants which is the same with the habits of our government and the feelings of our people. He wants to give the Indian tribes a good policy. Later on, he removes the Indian tribes from their homes in the Deep South and makes them march on the trail of tears, where they relocate to Eastern Oklahoma.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Indian Removal act of 1830 was in short; an act made law by Andrew Jackson relocating many Native American tribes west of the Mississippi river to unsettled lands. This would open up safer territory for those looking to colonize further west than the original thirteen colonies. Here are four men’s messages regarding the act that gives further insight into it all.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout time changes have been made to our country’s government in hopes of improving it, and reducing the flaws it has. Andrew Jackson made changes to our country in hopes of increasing its chances of longevity; however his methods in doing so are to this day very controversial. While Andrew Jackson was known as “the people’s president” his methods for improving America were quite ambiguous, and the concept of Jacksonian democracy is highly criticized. Andrew Jackson made contributions to our country while holding office; however his tactics were anything but democratic.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson evicted all of the Native Americans out of their homes, the process was done forcefully and it was unconstitutional. A first hand account from Private John G. Burnett gave America a slight taste of how horrifying Jackson’s decisions were. From Burnett’s passage reading “I saw the helpless Cherokees arrested and dragged from their homes.and driven at the bayonet point into the stockades”(Doc G). This proved the point Jackson was beyond inconsiderate of anyone besides himself. Before Jackson even began the Indian Removal Act, he tried to get his idea passed. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of the Native Americans. Jackson made five of the Indian tribes march west because white settlers found gold in the North, where the Indians resided. Five of the Native American tribes were impacted; they were, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek, Seminole, and the Cherokee. The Cherokee tribe was the only tribe to fight the eviction. While marching, one our of every four Cherokees died on the Trail of Tears. Jackson made his name hated even more by the Native Americans by adopting a Creek Indian…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Jackson ordered Indian removal despite the Constitution, and this was very controversial between the Native Americans, general public, and law makers. Andrew Jackson most certainly did not have the right to order the removal of the Native Americans. Beside from ethics, his own government branch of the Supreme Court declared it illegal. John Marshall decided that the Cherokees had their own nation, and it would be wrong for the United States to claim the land of the Cherokee their own. Jackson's people, the people of the United States felt that they had the right to deal with the land however they pleased, but that was just opinion. Legally, he did not have the right to force Indian removal.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2.10 Historian

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I agree with the statement, “The removal of Native Americans from their lands by the Indian Removal Act of 1830 violated their political, legal, and human rights.” The United States’ government was selfish for themselves with the prospering of themselves; the Indians were very understanding to all the treaties the United States forced them to agree with, until the Indian Removal Act; and the spectators of everything that was happening made the Americans look like enemies.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I argue that Andrew Jackson changed the way that politicians run and campaign and they way they portray themselves to the public eye.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson also known as, ‘Old Hickory’ promoted many policies that impacted the young nation. Known for his authoritarian style during his presidency it was no surprise Jackson would be harsh with the Native Americans and treat the Indians with no mercy while doing so. “Like most white frontiersmen. Jackson viewed Indians as barbarians without rights…” (Shi & Tindall 2015 p. 330) this influenced his decision to request congress to approve the Indian Removal Act. By debating this request congress allowed the president to neglect all prior treaties/negotiations to protect the lands of the Native American’s forefathers where they were residing. This would fuel the fire between many Americans because they had divided opinions on this matter,…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Next, Jackson was not democratic for economic reasons. Jackson vetoed the bill to recharter the second bank of the united states of america. He said it was protecting the democracy from going corrupt. Jackson was hated when he destroyed the national bank for personal reasons saying "The Bank is trying to kill me but i will kill it." He soon later passed the Indian Removal Act. Which forced Indians off their land and to move West. Although Indians didnt want to go into unknown land they were forced to by Jackson. He argued that white settlers needed the land to help make the land more profitable as the Indians were not doing. Jackson was not democratic for these reasons.…

    • 345 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson signed and implemented the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The Indian Removal Act was where Cherokee indians were forced to move from their land and walk thousands of miles to relocate to present day Oklahoma. Over four thousand Cherokee indians died along the way because of the environment conditions that includes the snow, rain, ice, freezing temperatures, starvation, illnesses, etc. They experienced diseases, starvation and exhaustion on their heartbreaking journey. It is recorded as a time of despair for the indians that were sent away unfairly.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Presidency of Andrew Jackson constituted a significant change in American politics. Never before had a president claimed so much power, and never before had a president claimed to be a true representative of all classes of people. An accurate portrayal of this historical figure has been debated since 1857, when the first historical narrative of the Jacksonian era was published by George Tucker (Cave). There does not seem to be a time in the foreseeable future when the matter will be resolved. That being said, it is worth considering all the evidence which either suggests that the seventh President of the United States was a President of the Common Man or a dictatorial ruler.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays