Lets go back to a time when Rome and Athens fought over citizenship. Rome was on the sweet side while Athens were cruel and only cared about one thing.; war. Rome has a better system.Rome citizenship for non romans, rome censors and citizenship levels, and rome order and stability of senate are the reasons why rome has a better citizenship Rome had a better citizenship for 4 reasons.
Censors watched citizenship levels , Non romans became citizens {A}, and the senate was orderly and stable {Front}.
Rome was generous to let non romans in to there city. They allowed free native born adult males as long as their parents were married in certain areas of the
Roman Empire. They allowed free native-born adult females, but with limited rights. Female and male children were considered citizens as long as their parents were citizens {A}. Rome was more equal to there citizens but still may have problems.
Censors watched the citizenship levels for new citizens and many more.
However in Athens, they had election by lottery which means that that every person had an equal chance. This was better than Romes citizenship but, Rome did still have theres but Rome only needed three hundred to form the senate.
The senate was old and stable but still did a great job taking care of countries.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Roman and Greece empires governments were similar in ways but differed in others. While both Romans and Greeks started as mere city states they went off in different directions with there civilizations politically. They also both had democracies but in different forms. They each had there own way of government and had different military styles, largely because of their location, which is also why Rome was more centralized and Greece was more dispersed. However, geography did not stop both Rome and Greece from being patriarchal, and thriving.…
- 502 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Write a short essay that compares and contrasts your selected civilization on that topic of…
- 588 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In ancient Greece the city-states was in a constant state of war with one another. allies quickly became enemies, and enemies quickly became allies. As the Greek philosopher Plato said, " only the dead has seen the end of war".…
- 141 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Seeing as Rome had a new Democratic government, not one individual could rule. However, they still had votes on who to elect for government and for the contestants it was big competition. According to Document A “Life of Caesar” by Plutarch, even the competition for smaller, miserable-looking communities was tough. This is because there is always “jealous…
- 292 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Athens and Sparta sometimes had common enemies. In 490 BC, the Persians, led by King Darius, invaded Greece. Athens and Sparta joined with other city-states to fight the Persians. The Greeks won in a famous battle at Marathon, however this victory at Marathon was done without the aid of the Spartan army. In 481 BC, Persia attacked again, this time led by Xerxes, Darius’ son. Athens and Sparta again united and eventually defeated the resurgent Persians.…
- 76 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Athens and Sparta were two Greek poleis that coexisted between 750-c. 500 B.C.E. (Duiker 119). Even though these two city-states were similar in a few ways, they were different in many more ways, so they didn’t particularly get along very well. Almost every aspect of their lives was different, from their government systems, to their views on men and women, and finally to their lasting effects on Greek history and culture. Despite their differences, they both influenced Greece and the Mediterranean areas.…
- 551 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Athens and Sparta had lots of things in common, but Athens had and did stuff better than Sparta. Like Athens geography, they were able to develop a strong naval fleet because they were close to the Aegean sea, and geographic features helped influence the development of society. Also, it was easier for Athens to trade because they were close to the Aegean sea. They also had better cultural achievements. Athens had the Olympic games when people come and watch people fight and do tons of activities.…
- 227 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Imperial Rome’s political control was mainly based on social status. For instance wealthy men dominated over women, and poor men. They had a written code of law that offered plebeians (poorer class) protection from abuse. This gave the plebeians an opportunity to shape public policy. Romans took great pride in this, and believed they enjoyed greater freedom than most of their neighbors. They had a rule of law, the rights of citizens, the absences of pretension, upright moral behavior, and keeping ones word. This was later recognized as “the way of the ancestors.”…
- 424 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Describe daily life in Sparta. Be detailed in your descriptions (government; rules of citizenship; slavery; military aims/objectives/practices/philosophies; trade with other city-states; rights/roles of women and children)…
- 1223 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Constitutions and laws have made up the political and social organization of civilizations since the beginning of time. During the time of Ancient Greece two constitutions stuck out as prominent and created successful civilizations. The Constitution of Athens and the Constitution of the Lacedaemonians were grotesquely different in their ideas of social and economic classes, education, and fitness; whereas, the civilizations were the same in the idea of punishment for breaking the laws.…
- 1247 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
__________________________ set a precedent for treating its vanquished foes after forming the Roman Confederation by offering the most favored "allied" peoples full Roman citizenship, thus giving them a stake in successful Roman expansion.…
- 3331 Words
- 14 Pages
Good Essays -
In Ancient Greece, the two most essential cities were Sparta and Athens. The two cities had a diversity of cultures, lifestyle, and values, even though they lived in the same region. Sparta was established around 900 BCE. It is located in the Eurotoas valley of Laconia, southeast of Peloponnese (Sparta, Ancient History Encyclopedia). Ancient Sparta has a population of about 100,000 citizens. Spartans dedicate approximately all their time to military training, hunting, war tactics, and even war policies. These activities are what makes Sparta admire war and what makes other cities fear them. Athens has been around for about 3,000 years. Athens is the capital of Greece and it is also the largest city. It is also the intellectual center of Greece. Athens originated from as early as 5000 BCE. Athens began as a small, Mycenaean community and grew to become a city (Athens, Ancient History Encyclopedia). The Athenian King, who ruled the land, sought to name the city after a Greek God because he wanted the name to be divine. Athena was selected, hence, the name Athens. Athens was a city that exemplifies ancient Greece. Society, politics, and economy are what make cities diverse, but they can have a…
- 621 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
On balance, in the case of The People of Athens vs. Euphiletos of Oea the court should rule in the affirmative. On all three arguments (1.a, 1.b, 2.a) made in the case, the side of the defense has won. In the first argument, we can prove the Section 11 of the Law of Athens permits one to lawfully kill a seducer. In the second argument, the fact that one can lawfully kill a seducer will help to justify the death of Eratosthenes of Oea. In the final argument, the defense can prove that the Laws of Drako do not require a penalty to be imposed on Euphiletos to be imposed on him in killing Eratosthenes. As such, Euphiletos should not be punished for his lawful killing of Eratosthenes of Oea.…
- 1453 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The process of becoming a citizen in Rome did not require much from those who wanted to become a Roman citizen. This gives Roman citizens less restrictions and…
- 802 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman Republic got its start when the last Etruscan king was abolished along with the monarchy in 509 B.C. (T&E 262). Although most of the republic was controlled by rich, aristocratic leaders, Rome still prospered from it, rather than the monarchy. That includes both wealthy nobles, and commoners alike, but in the republic they had other social labels. The patricians, or wealthy aristocrats, were the individuals who elected the consuls. The plebeians, or common people, made up more of the population, but still didn’t make up as much of the senate as the patricians, and this caused social conflict. The senate consisted of aristocrats that had a vast knowledge of politics. The senate made most of the crucial decisions with acknowledgement over the consuls (T&E 262).…
- 802 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays