Analyzing Nicholas Carr's Article Summary
In the article, Carr stated that one of source he used to write is paper stated that, “It is clear that users are not reading online in the traditional sense”; meaning that the way we read now is what you would call ‘skimming’ or reading “horizontally through titles, contents pages and abstracts going for quick wins”. Individuals who Reads on the web, don't read the whole article. Another problem with reading on the web is that there is always a temptation to skip from page to page causing readers to lose their concentration while read on the web which cause people to lose focus when looking at physical reading. Nicholas Carr used this particular example because it is something him and the readers can relate too. This information that Carr gathered and used, helps his article because it supports what he has said
…show more content…
Another example of logos that Carr uses in his writing the use of text messaging. Carr said that text messaging and cell phones are giving us a whole new different type of reading experience than in the 1960’s and 70’s. Carr also said that this type of reading “may be weakening our capacity for the kind of deep reading”. I think his information is very useful because it points towards younger kids which can attract another type of readers. What this example illustrates is that Carr us attempting to 'construct some kind of connecting with is readers. In spite of the fact that this appears like a solid strategy to draw in alternate age based group of readers,, it could cause conflict between other readers that as of now have a set seen idea about these impacts. In another section of the article, Carr Contradicts himself by utilizing the data from James Olds, "an educator of neuroscience", when he expresses that the human mind is very malleable and has the ability to
Another example of logos that Carr uses in his writing the use of text messaging. Carr said that text messaging and cell phones are giving us a whole new different type of reading experience than in the 1960’s and 70’s. Carr also said that this type of reading “may be weakening our capacity for the kind of deep reading”. I think his information is very useful because it points towards younger kids which can attract another type of readers. What this example illustrates is that Carr us attempting to 'construct some kind of connecting with is readers. In spite of the fact that this appears like a solid strategy to draw in alternate age based group of readers,, it could cause conflict between other readers that as of now have a set seen idea about these impacts. In another section of the article, Carr Contradicts himself by utilizing the data from James Olds, "an educator of neuroscience", when he expresses that the human mind is very malleable and has the ability to