The United States is a democratic republic because the Constitution contains both democratic and republican elements. The democratic element is that everyone gets to vote. In the republican part, people elect someone to vote for them. This elected individual is called a representative. Everyone gets to vote for a representative. This is how the democratic and republican elements work together in the Constitution.…
Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…
Federalist and Anti-Federalist perspectives at first tend to appear to be polar opposites in nature. The Federalists supported and sought to ratify the Constitution of the United States of America. Whereas the Anti-Federalists were hesitant to do so, and feared that the powers allotted in the Constitution would result in the newly birthed United States descending into a monarchy. The very same form of government that had proved dissatisfactory to the colonists in the first place. Therefore it may appear to be a moot point when deciding whether both viewpoints would be in harmony or opposition in regards to the power held by the modern presidency. The Anti-Federalists believed that power should rest with the states. However the Federalists wanted a strong central government headed by one official. This was because the Articles of Confederation (which gave the majority of power to the states) had failed miserably. However, while the Federalists and Anti-Federalists held opposite viewpoints, they had the same goal in mind: To create a free and balanced society, “It is here taken for granted, that all agree in this, that whatever government we adopt, it ought to be a free one,” (Brutus, 25). However, due to the initial ambiguous measure the framers of the Constitution took with regards to the executive branch, there have historically been events of a United States President overstepping his boundaries and violating the merits of both U.S. and Constitutional doctrine. Therefore both the Federalists as well as the Anti-Federalists would agree that in light of decisions made during George W. Bush’s consecutive terms that the modern presidency must be restricted.…
Corroborating with the Constitution. Worried too a lot of democracy, so defend restricted famous voting of federal officers. In contradiction with the Constitution. Worried that the Constitution took to many power, far away from the people.…
With many different views on how to run the government, it was hard to depict which parties’ group would be the strongest and the best fit to control the country: the Federalists’ or the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists’ wanted a very strong government to bring together the bickering states. On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans pictured more independent state governments to rule the people. Although they didn’t agree on many things they did have one idea in common, such as, both parties wanted to follow the Constitution, but in different ways.…
the Federalists and Democratic differences were that they both had a different leader Federalists had Alexander Hamilton and Democratic Republicans leader was Thomas Jefferson. Federalists, lost interception of the constitution and they, and also the federal constitution. The Federalist was in charge to protect the Tarrifs. Federalist thought that it should be educated men who should own their own property and would also protect everyone's rights. The Democratic Republicans differences were that the they wanted the limit the government power.…
America’s government can be defined as a federal republic. Federal meaning that individual states have a certain degree of power, but centrally there is a national government that has authority over them. In a republic, the people have the power to elect leaders who will govern according to the set of laws in the U.S Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Even though we have a set of codes and guidelines to help us run the government, with the recent government shut down it is obvious that the national government is doing something wrong.…
American federalism offers a solution to fears that the people will only be ruled by majorities from different regions that contained different interests and values. In the past America was run by the Articles of Confederation but it was not strong enough to hold the nation together. Under the loose Articles of Confederation, the national and state government was unable to maintain order. After the Revolution, Americans mounted debt from purchasing goods from other countries. To solve this problem the states would tax their citizens and this caused many people to go into bankruptcy. When Shay’s Rebellion happened people started realizing that by having a less powerful national government, it created many problems within the states and it also demonstrated the importance to maintain domestic order. The framers of the constitution created a federal government that replaced the weak confederation with a more powerful national government.…
Federalists and Democratic-Republicans are very different in the way they think and act. Federalists had a strong federal government and were ruled by a wealthy class while the Democratic republicans had a strong state government and were ruled by people…
We Federalist’s believe that the government needs to be divided into three parts, with equal powers and balances and checks, for it to work effectively. Now the Anti-Federalist’s believe that we are trying to give all power to the larger states in the North and ignore the needs of our brethren the South states. We are not. We are just trying to create a fair government.…
Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalist had good reasoning for what they believed in, but the one side that stuck out to me was the Federalist side. The Federalists believed that America was headed in the wrong direction with the Articles of Confederation. It was believed by the Federalists that we needed a stronger national government because that would help protect individual rights. They also believed that we were in need of a new constitution or we just needed to change the constitution a bit. The Anti-Federalists believed that our national government shouldn’t be so strong or else it would turn into the British government, which was cruel, and harsh. But what would happen if our national government were to become weak all of the sudden,…
Our government is passed on federalism. Which means a government that shared its power between national, state and local governments. Our founding fathers wanted nothing to do with a centralized government and created the exact opposite, the federal government.…
We have 3 branches of government because we didn’t want monarchy. The U.S. Constitution stated that the U.S. should split the power. So we split it into 3 branches so 1 branch wouldn’t get all the power. The United States of America is a democracy (an indirect democracy or republic, to be specific). The citizens of the country can attend fair elections.…
Sovereignty, which is the authority to govern has three main categories, federalism, confederacy, and unitary system. Federalism limits the power of the government by dividing the national, and the state government. State and Federal power is then again divided into legislative, judiciary, and executive branches. This all keeps no one group maintaining all of the power, it is a constant check and balance. The power of the state is what the national government does not have, and also has to be deemed as legal. Both the state and federal government have denied powers, which are as you can guess powers that are denied to them. The history of federalism in the United states started off as a dual federalism in which the power of the federal government was limited to enumerated, which was an overall state centered form.…
Federalists argued, the new Constitution, with its strong federal government and its systems of checks and balances, would help provide “a republican remedy for the evils most incident to republican government”…