Intro to Fiction
Final Essay
Is what’s True, Really True? In order to validate whether or not something is true, even if it’s not, we would have to understand what it means to be real. When something is actually existing as a thing and not artificial/fake is the meaning of something being real and something being true. The way we perceive something is what makes something true or not. Everyone has their own sense of interpreting information, whether it’d be pictures, colors, words, advice, conversations etc. Can something be true, even if it isn’t? Yes, something can be true even if it isn’t. In the “Turn of the Screw” the governess was witnessing paranormal/supernatural occurrences. She would see clear images of two …show more content…
But Mrs. Grose and Flora cannot agree on something if they don’t see it. Even though the apparitions are not true to everyone else, they were very true to the governess. This makes the untrue, in fact true. “She isn’t there, little lady, and nobody’s there---and you never see nothing, my sweet! How can poor Miss Jessel---when poor Miss Jessel’s dead and buried? We know don’t we love?” “It’s all a mere mistake and a worry and a joke.” (p 71) Mrs. Grose assures the governess that what she is claiming to see is just in her head. It does not exist, and she just wants her to let up. What the governess sees and what Mrs. Grose doesn’t see are true factual instances. The governess could have the ability to witness the non living while Mrs. Grose does …show more content…
A test was used to distinguish the androids from humans. This test was called the Voigt-Kampff testing apparatus. Originally it would only take a few questions to be asked in order to determine whether or not it was an android. However, once the Nexus- 6 makers began to lose so many droids they felt it was necessary to prove the Voigt-Kampff test as a faulty test. The Rosen organization created these androids and gathered a group of them to be tested. One Android was tested and she passed as a human at first until Deckard asked a last question. Up until the very last question Rachel was real, she was true. She was able to function as a natural human being would be able to function. She was able to portray some types of emotions. Rachel was existent, if you touched her arm, it would feel like a human arm. Her identity would not have been discovered if it had not been for that