Preview

Analysis Of Thomas Hobbes: Are Humans Naturally Good Or Evil

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
444 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Thomas Hobbes: Are Humans Naturally Good Or Evil
Are humans naturally good or evil? I will mention two philosophers with two different thoughts on this. Hobbes believed we are all naturally evil and should be contained. Locke believed humans are reasonable and can rule themselves. I think humans are naturally evil, but Locke brings up some valid points as well. Hobbes states that without a government there would be nothing but chaos. Even though there are sizable amounts of good people, the bad would find ways to control, torture, or do other evil things before good could act. A single strong ruler like Hobbes believes is the way sounds like a way for evil to take power. A government that exists to bring order and peace would be ideal. A government that is guided by the people like Locke believes would be a good way to see if order is indeed being upheld. There are many reasons/examples as to why I think humans are naturally evil. The first human instinct is to survive. Greed is a thing humans are born with, based off this ancient survival instinct that has frequently taken to extremes. Humans are also quick to hate others for believing or preferring other things. I see all the time on the Internet, people hating on each other because they like/use/prefer other things, like the console wars, a constant argument between PlayStation fans …show more content…
Not everyone will be good all the time, they may do wrong out of greed, laziness, or other, but almost everyone has done some sort of wrong. But there are people that have done little wrong in their lives, who have become in control of primitive instincts of greed and other evils, at least mostly, not fully for most however. People have wronged each other for their own benefit, and still do, but they know they are doing wrong even if they wont admit it. Locke is only partly right about people being reasonable, some are, some aren’t, all do have potential to be reasonable, but because of evil desires not all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to Hobbes, a government is needed to create social order. Because humans are naturally self-persevering, they are always in a state of conflict with one another. There are fundamental laws that a government set is place to restrain natural human…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page

    Throughout history, people have debated about what government is, and what is the purpose of it. Should the government dictate people's lives and tell them what to do? Should the government be permissive and just allow the people take care of themselves and not step in? Should there be an in between? Two very influential philosophers from the 17th century Enlightenment, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, are preeminent influences on how people see what a government is and what role it should take. They both were renowned influences in many governments, even to this day. Locke took the side that people are naturally good, and that they should rule themselves. While on the other hand, Hobbes said that humans are naturally brutish and evil,…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nature vs. Nurture: Is mankind inherently good or bad? In my personal opinion, I think that people are naturally born pure and innocent. In Frankenstein, the creature just wanted to be a part of the community, and when Victor created him, he was eager to learn and he had no fault.…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 18

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Locke agrees with Hobbes that the purpose of government is to create order in society but contends that people are reasonable and would cooperate with each other and could rebel if ruler were tyrant. Ruler stays in power only as long as he has consent of those governed. He said people had natural rights, including right to life,…

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many philosophers, such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, have discussed over the years if he human race is naturally good or evil. People than choice their side of the argument, one side believing that humans have a basically good nature that is corrupted by society, while the other side believes that humans have a bad nature that is kept in check by society. As John Locke believes that the human race is good, it is reasonable to accept as true because we are born neutral, with free will, and fear of a higher power.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many beliefs on if man is born evil or if society is corrupts man. The belief that man is born evil is a monstrosity. The belief that man is born good and is corrupted by society though, is not. Two famous philosophers will agree. They are Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Locke. "Rousseau believed that through a society people become evil"(Mr. Hughes). "Locke believed that everyone was born with a blank slate and that what you experience determines [if] you're good or evil"(John Locke). Man is born good, with a clean slate and society is what corrupts man to evil, through the media, social groups, and peer pressure.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout human history, people have shown through many ways that they possess the ability to exude pure evil (or some form of it). There are a few exceptions to this vile display, however it is nearly impossible to deny that everyone possesses it. I believe that humans are bad because they attempt/commit acts of murder and violence (and in some severe cases genocide) and are obsessed with power and self-improvement.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Hobbes, government is needed so that society will not collapse into violence due to humanity’s selfish desires and self-interest. Hobbes believes that humanity’s natural state is motivated by self-interest and will do everything they can to succeed in their endeavors. People will do whatever it takes to fulfill what their idea of ‘good ’is. When everyone acts this way it quickly devolves into chaos, war, and violence.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that people are born neither inherently good nor evil, but are created as blank slates to be constructed by childhood impressions and other life experiences. In my opinion, the concepts of good and bad are impossible to be natural instinct. Rather, these ideas are mainly formed by the guidance and direction from one’s parents, and also by observation of the environment, and how others handle specific interactions.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In Two Treatise of Government,Locke argued that people formed governments to protect their natural rights.The best kind of government he said had limited power and was accepted by all citizens.”(Ellis and Esler 183)…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, in the case of nature vs. nurture, nurture is what makes humans do evil things. From boys living alone, trying to survive on an island, to grown men thrown into a psychological experiment, their environment is what causes their sadistic/evil behavior. Although it is true that people make the wrong decisions in life, it does not mean that they were born with a desire to do…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roots Of Evil

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If people are born good what makes them become evil? Evil is grown in people's hearts over time and the more someone gives into temptation, the more evil their heart becomes. People are inherently good, however, some people succumb to evil because of the lack of self-restraint against temptation.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scientists and psychologists have different opinions regarding this. Some scientists see that people are born evil while others believe that people are naturally good. The Christianity concept of the original sin states that people are born with a normal psychological condition which is the desire for doing bad things. On the other hand, according to Islam, people are born upon Fitra. There is much research in the scientific and psychology fields that support the both opinions. Nevertheless, it seems that there is more convincing evidence for the opinion that says people are born good. “Society corrupted man; however, people were born good at birth”. (Cameron, 2013). Being good is one’s nature before getting influenced by the outside sources. We are all born good. However, we might develop tendencies for being evil depending on the surrounding circumstances. We come pure in this life; nevertheless, we learn how to be bad. Throughout the life, we learn and acquire evil and violence. We learn all the amoral qualities. We learn greed, selfishness, Gossiping, hatred, lie, and stinginess. It is impossible to be born with these qualities. There is no way to carry such genes in our blood. Human being is pure. However, society and environment contaminates us…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are humans naturally good or bad? Humans are not evil “ it is human nature to think wisely and act foolishly” (Anatole France). Humans are naturally good because the people have acts of kindness, art & beauty and also heroism. Most people in the world show this characteristics and give the world knowledge and creative ideas to one another.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Augustine on Evil

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is impossible to deny the existence of evil in the world as human beings experience pain and suffering every day. It is generally accepted that there are two different types of evil: natural and moral. Moral evil is caused by human beings and occurs when humans inflict suffering on other people, animals or the environment. Natural evil is not caused by humans and occurs naturally in the world, such as earthquakes, droughts and cancer. It is apparent that not all evils can be easily separated into these categories as humans can contribute to natural evils such like cancer, although cancer is a naturally occurring disease, humans often do things which bring it about.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays