Preview

Analysis Of The Federalist Paper No. 51 By James Madison

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of The Federalist Paper No. 51 By James Madison
In the Federalist paper No. 51, James Madison argues that, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” Madison wanted a system of government where the powers would be divided. He just did not want a majority to choose policy. For this reason he divided Congress into the House of Representatives and the Senate to help separate the power. Madison as well as his fellow Framers felt that the non-wealthy majority would tyrannize the wealthy minority if given political power. He feared that the majority would get together and unite around one policy issue and they could oppress the minority. James Madison developed the principal architect to the American government which had sometimes been referred to as the Madisonian system. Madison proposed that as much control be placed beyond the control of the majority as possible. His plan placed only the House of Representatives within direct control of the votes of the majority. A small minority, not the people themselves, elected most government officials. With that being said, even if the majority seized control of the House of Representatives, they still could not proclaim policies without the agreement of the Senate and the president. Even with Madison proposal, the Electoral College has started to vote the way the popular majority in each state votes. …show more content…
Separation of powers is a feature of the Constitution that requires each of the three branches of government to be relatively independent of the others so that one cannot control the others. The constitution does not divide power absolutely but instead, it shares it among the government. James Madison, as well as the Founders, also came up with a federal system of government which divided the power between a national government and the individual states. They sought the federal system as an additional check on the national

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison begins his paper stating that he believes that each branch of the government should be independent from one another. If possible the branches would have as little agency with one another as possible. He believed that members from the different branches of the government should not be able to appoint each other or decide on other salaries. If these rules were followed the people would be in more control of the government by picking the best representative in each branch of the government. Madison and the Framers realized that every position couldn’t be elective because of political pressures and certain needed qualifications, such as in the judicial…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two documents that I chose were Federalist Papers No. 51 and Federalist Papers No. 10. I chose document No. 51 because it stood out to me the most since checks and balances are something that we hear about every day and the checks and balances are used to check other branches of government to make sure that they do not get out of line. I chose No. 10 because it was the one where factions are used and we have factions because we have unalienable rights and we have all of the rights to have freedom of… and others like that.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Madison, factions were caused by a few things. The first was the unequal distribution of property/wealth. Something else that caused factions was the fact that small groups were only for local issues/passions. Too many factions in a political party were dangerous, as each group believed a variety of different things. With many factions holding various opinions, this meant that no political party would have definite control of the government. This meant that the larger the faction, the more it could use its larger values and beliefs on others; merely because there are more people in a larger faction. Madison was against a majority rule. This is why Madison came to the conclusion that…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. What did Madison believe would prevent the “unjust majority” from taking control of the government? By adding a representative democracy, it would keep everything in “check” by having a representative speak for the people. 3.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    POLS Assignment 1

    • 868 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Federalist paper 10 Madison argues that if an extended republic was set up including a multiplicity of economic, geographic, social, religious, and sectional interests, these interests, by checking each other, would prevent American society from being divided into the clashing armies of the rich and the poor. Thus, if no interstate proletariat could become organized on purely economic lines, the property of the rich would be safe even though the mass of the people held political power. His solution for the class struggle was not to set up an absolute and irresponsible state to regiment society from above; he was never willing to sacrifice liberty to gain security. He wished to multiply the deposits of political power in the state itself sufficiently to break down the sole dualism of rich and poor and thus to guarantee both liberty and security.…

    • 868 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist 47- In this paper, Madison is responding to the issue of having a federal government. He argues against the assumption that this new government will be allotted too much power and control America as an empire. In response, Madison writes that the U.S Constitution balances the government well by using the system of separation of powers among the executive, judiciary, and legislature. Madison also stated that these powers would blend and intertwine; however that would not affect the factor of separation of power. To support his argument, Madison referred to the writings of Montesquieu. According to Montesquieu, tyranny results when one branch of government concurrently holds the powers of another branch. However, Madison argues that Montesquieu "did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other." He interprets this as a system that supports checks and balances. Overall, he responds by stating his views on separation of power and by stating checks and balances has been followed in individual state constitutions before, so it should be trusted now.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist #51 Analysis

    • 737 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The key solution to avoid the concentration of power in the hands of a single branch of government is to ensure that each branch remains independent from each other. The separation of powers within the government is designed to counter the opposing segments ambition. Madison makes this clear when he states, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.”…

    • 737 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison asserts factions are detrimental to the government because they tend to cause chaotic discourse between those involved, thus not accomplishing anything. Citizens that are concerned about their government do not want factions, and they are willing to lawfully combat against them. Madison also asserts that governments should be admired, but he acknowledges that it would be incorrect to say governments are absolutely flawless. He also acknowledges how people find it unfair that the majority tends to be favored over the minority. The majority is not always right because it…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve years after declaring independence, the American people were struggling to articulate their vision for government. They were acutely aware of the shortcomings of a weak central government under the Articles of Confederation, yet they still felt strongly that the individual states maintain their power. James Madison drafted the Virginia Plan in 1787, with a goal of stabilizing the budding nation by according more authority to a central government than before. These resolutions would ultimately become a new Constitution. It was in January 1788, after five states had ratified but eight were still skeptical, that Madison penned a letter to the Independent Journal, wherein he detailed his rationale for the larger federal government.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The separation of powers between the three branches of the federal is not a total separation. Each branch has control over the others to keep one from becoming more power than the remaining branches. This is known as a system of checks and balances. There is a second check in the division of power between the national and state governments known as federalism. When the Constitution was written, there was an attempt to create a national government with limited powers that allowed the states to retain most of their sovereign powers.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In James Madison’s The Federalist 10 and 51, he argues for more government power over the people. He explains that factions might come up and infringe on the rights of other citizens and giving the government more power will help these factions stay under control. He argues that factions or “men of factitious tempers…may by intrigue, by corruption, or by other means, first obtain the suffrages, and then betray the interests, of the people…” Madison believed greatly in the powers for the government and we see this where he says “But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature?” He doesn’t just say to give the government unlimited power but also says that “the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” He argued for more power to the government but also wanted the government to not be corrupt.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1700’s our founding fathers wrote many documents to control the government in their time and make it better for the future. One of the most influential groups of essays written are the Federalist Papers. Written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay these papers were made to promote the ratification of the Constitution of the United States. SInce the papers were written such a long time ago, some have become outdated and are no longer useful in today's society. Federalist Paper 51 is one of the most powerful and popular of the essays written. Written by Alexander Hamilton, the paper explains how the government should run including the necessity of checks and balances and exclusion of government…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison argues how checks and balances can not only advocate a separation of powers but also create an effective government. Madison writes to help his readers understand how a well structured government can lead to a successful country. One of his main arguments is that no branch should have too much power, therefore, different branches of government should exist. "Legislative, judiciary magistracies should be drawn from the same fountain of authority, the people, through canals having no communication whatever with one another." To assure greater independence, government is separated into the Legislative Branch, the House of the Representatives and the Senate. He states "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition." meaning the ambitions of legislators must be checked by the executive and judicial branch which is then checked by the ambitions of legislators and presidents. This separation of powers advocated the idea of compromise. Madison also asserts that the members of each branch should not be too dependent on the members of the other two branches. If a man is presented with too much power, it may rule over him. Madison states "If men were angels, no government would be necessary. " The government must control the people but control itself as well. While the will of the people is no doubt the primary control on the government, other controls are necessary.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Madisonian Dilemma

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Madisonian Dilemma has been apart of American politics since the beginning of its creation. Since the existence of factions this difficult problem had arisen. How does one set up a government "that preserves individual liberty without destroying the freedoms that make it possible?" Madison thought of two different ways to deal with this dilemma; one get rid of factions all together or two to control their effects. Being as getting rid of factions is near impossible; Madison chose the latter by saying that we need a republican form of government. The Madisonian Dilemma is encountered every day in American politics and there are many factors that impact it.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Separation of Powers is very important; it creates unique roles for each branch of government. There are three different branches, there’s the legislative branch, the judicial branch, and the executive branch. In the legislative branch, the laws are created, budgets are passed, and wars are declared. The judicial branch determines which laws apply to specific cases, reviews constitutionally of laws, and determines interpretations of laws. The executive branch enforces, or vetoes the laws that the legislative branch creates, declares state of emergency, and appoints federal judges, cabinet advisers, and others at the approval of the Senate. The purpose of the Separation of Powers is to ensure that no one party or belief can have more control over the government than another.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays