Analysis Of Marie Umutesi's Surviving The Slaughter
At first glance, one may agree that Marie Umutesi’s autobiography is a truthful testimony about the historical event known as the Rwandan Genocide and its aftermath, but further analysis proves that the terms “truthful” and “testimony” cannot accurately describe Surviving the Slaughter. Using Jacques Derrida’s Demeure and Umutesi’s Surviving the Slaughter, one is able to analyze the meanings of these terms to reveal that, in the context of Umutesi’s writing, they are not completely valid, and the autobiography can instead be described as a genuine attempt to share her memory of her experiences.
The word “truthful” seems straightforward from the outside, but when questioning the truthfulness of Surviving the Slaughter, one must examine the
The word “truthful” seems straightforward from the outside, but when questioning the truthfulness of Surviving the Slaughter, one must examine the