Preview

Analysis of Crito

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
454 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis of Crito
Analysis of Crito

The question is raised within the dialogue between Socrates and Crito concerning civil disobedience. Crito has the desire, the means, and many compelling reasons with which he tries to convince the condemned to acquiesce in the plan to avoid his imminent death. Though Crito's temptation is imposing, it is in accord with reason and fidelity that Socrates chooses to fulfill his obligation to the state, even to death. Before addressing Crito's claims which exhort Socrates to leave the state and avoid immanent death, the condemned lays a solid foundation upon which he asserts his obligation to abide by the laws. The foundation is composed of public opinion, doing wrong, and fulfillment of one's obligations. Addressing public opinion, Socrates boldly asserts that it is more important to follow the advice of the wise and live well than to abide by the indiscriminate and capricious public opinion and live poorly. Even when it is the public who may put one to death, their favor need not be sought, for it is better to live well than to submit to their opinion and live poorly. Next, wrongful doing is dispatched of. They both consent to the idea that, under no circumstances, may one do a wrong, even in retaliation, nor may one do an injury; doing the latter is the same as wrong doing. The last foundation to be questioned is the fulfillment of one's obligations. Both of the philosophers affirm that, provided that the conditions one consents to are legitimate, one is compelled to fulfill those covenants. These each are founded upon right reasoning and do provide a justifiable foundation to discredit any design of dissent. At line fifty, Socrates executes these foundations to destroy and make untenable the petition that he may rightfully dissent: Then consider the logical consequence. If we leave this place without first persuading the state to let us go, are we or are we not doing an injury, and doing it in a quarter where it is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Socrates argues in the Crito that he shouldn 't escape his death sentence because it isn 't just. Crito and friends can provide the ransom the warden demands. If not for himself, Socrates should escape for the sake of his friends, sons, and those who benefit from his teaching. Socrates and Crito 's argument proceeds from this point. There are many instances in Plato 's the Crito where Socrates gives reasons for himself to stay in Athens and face his death. Arguments range from that of him being too old to run, to the common response two wrongs don 't make a right. Socrates expresses that he is obligated to obey the laws of his city by living there, which means you should obey your parents and the morals in which you were raised. Socrates was very guided by reason.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chicken Range Free

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    | Suggests there should be a just or fair response to any situation, especially to a criminal or harmful act.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Probation and Parole

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A The severity of punishment should parallel the severity of the harm resulting from the crime.…

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Questions for Exam 3

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    9) when deviance is perceived to not cause injury or harm to anyone it is which technique of neutralization?…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia the assisted killing of a terminal patient is a controversial topic that medical professionals cannot avoid. Many health professionals face the ethical dilemma of whether or not they should end a patient’s misery. Patient’s rights are always the top priority, doctors are taught to find every possible way to treat and cure the patient, but the possibility of the patient being irremediable to what extent is the health care professionals willing to go to give the patient their wishes?…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Criminal Sentencing

    • 3708 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Retribution is the idea that someone should be punished based on what they did. Often described using the adage “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth”, retribution relies on the…

    • 3708 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philippa Foot, Emerita Professor of Philosophy at the University of California at Los Angeles, has been studying and writing about the moral implications of killing someone versus letting someone die for many years. She also explains to us the difference between the negative and positive rights of a person and how negative rights and duties are more stringent than positive rights and duties. I shall be looking at this theory and explaining how it applies to certain cases. Before we can discuss these rights and how they apply to these situations, though, we must know what they truly mean.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harm – “occurs in any crime, although not all harms are crimes.” (Schmalleger) Murder is an obvious example of a crime involving harm but there is debate regarding victimless crimes such as, prostitution, or gambling which may only harm the actor.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Code Of Hammurabi

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    consequence. You could not do wrong by someone and get away with it. You could not even be…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    History of Punishment

    • 2331 Words
    • 10 Pages

    vengeance a duty to be carried out by the person wronged or by a family…

    • 2331 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    attempts to accomplish is to allow a person to die with peace and dignity. In…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Croc Analysis

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the future, Crocs could grow, both by acquisition and by product extension. For product extension, they should use the Japanese product development map what it is called don’t remember any more (this development tree map can be seen below). Focus on the IP (formula) and reuse it on other products [This is a fragment connect it to previous senetence or make it a sentence. I don't understand what do you want to say by it]. This should give them a good map and guidance what product markets they can enter and extend the markets that they can work on.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The notion of ‘offence’ is ambiguous: whether or not something merely offends or causes harm is debatable and there is no value-neutral viewpoint from which we can decide where to draw the line between offence and harm.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Load 1

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    |Release: includes legal and ethical consideration, instituting a corrective plan of assistance, possible probation or termination. |…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Patel

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Golden rule: Don't do to others what you don't want other to do to you. Be fair.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays