Preview

Analysis Of Crime And Punishment By Fyodor Dostoevsky

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1090 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Crime And Punishment By Fyodor Dostoevsky
In Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky, Raskolnikov finds himself torn between the forces of good and evil and becomes unsure of his footing on such unstable ground. He believes that he can put good into the world by killing his evil pawnbroker, but he ends up having his world go spiralling out of control due to unforeseen circumstances. Raskolnikov believes that extraordinary men should be exempt from commonly perceived “wrongdoing” because they are more intelligent than the common masses. However, extraordinary entails the fulfillment of prerequisites that Raskolnikov has neither the will or the wherewithal to complete. Raskolnikov sees himself as an extraordinary man because he is willing to go to brutal ends to justify virtuous …show more content…
Furthermore, his thinking is constituted of poor explanations of why he is remorseful of his crimes, for he believes “Suffering and pain are always obligatory for a broad consciousness and a deep heart” (Dostoevsky 3.5.264) because he sees his feelings as pity that his victims were unfortunate enough to need to be killed, despite Alyona and Lizaveta’s perceived innocence. Raskolnikov is incapable of having the “broad consciousness” he so proudly boasted about due to him being an echochamber of his own radical nihilist ideals. If he were as aware as he believes himself to be, he would know that his murders were not justified. Alyona may not be a spotless victim, but her mentally challenged sister Lizaveta is. Lizaveta was caught in the crossfire of Raskolnikov’s dirty deed and thus her death should weigh on his conscious as a severe sin and not the compassion he wishes it represented. The collateral damage that Lizaveta’s death represents is reprehensible and should not be seen as a necessary casualty to protect the masses. If Raskolnikov was truly of high intellect, he would have never allowed such a casualty to happen in the first place. His work was hasty and sloppy, for “He was terribly hurried… It was not so much that his hands were trembling as that he …show more content…
His sociopathic remark reflects a disconnect from reality in that he finds the only fault in his actions being his failure to send his mission to completion. Raskolnikov’s mind is tied retrospectively to what he wishes would have happened, and he is unable to see reality in an authentic light, for his fixation is that he nearly got away with murder because he is too prideful to admit Lizaveta did not deserve death. This blunder is due to his misappropriation of worth in that the wealth Alyona represents far outweighs the sanctity of Lizaveta’s innocent stature; Raskolnikov’s self interest plays far too large of a role in his decision making because he consistently chooses to passively ignore his self imposed values for cheap gratification of evil. Again, sin gets the best of Raskolnikov seeing that he is unable to overcome his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Crime and Punishment

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov's guilt got the worst of him. After the murder, he was called to the police where he overheard conversations about the murder which caused him to faint. When he recovered, he blamed fainting on the paint and hurried home because his guilt made him think "there will be a search at once." (pg 109) Rodya fell ill which was because he had to face a great deal of tormenting guilt. The amount of guilt he had in his heart sparked the meaning of the novel which was a form of punishment for his crime.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rift between Raskolnikov and the rest of society is introduced when he first describes his “extraordinary man” theory. Raskolnikov develops his theory during a specific time when he has isolated himself in his room to contemplate solutions to his life problems. Raskolnikov studies how other “great” men in history have solved their problems. He points out “that the majority of those benefactors and guiding spirits of mankind were particularly fearsome bloodletters” (309). Napoleon is specifically referenced. Raskolnikov believes that some men, like Napoleon, are “extraordinary,” or above the moral rules that govern the rest of society. As a result, “great” men, similar to Napoleon, are entitled to do as they please. As Raskolnikov considers committing murder, he justifies this behavior saying, “One death to a hundred lives…the old woman is harmful. She’s wearing another person’s life out” (80-1). Raskolnikov believes that he fits in this “extraordinary” category, therefore making it acceptable for him to murder Alyona, the common pawnbroker. He believes himself to be a “great” man, acting for a higher purpose beyond conventional moral law. This theory proves to be inaccurate, thus creating the breach between Raskolnikov and society’s views of acceptable moral behavior.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Raskonikov is beginning to think he is going to be caught. When questioned by Porfiry Petrovich he gets denfensive and looks guilty. In his conversation with Sonia he says she will find out who killed her friend soon.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Study Guide Lesson 1

    • 5830 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Raskolnikov's name means “divided,” which is appropriate since his fundamental character trait is his alienation from human society. His pride and intellectualism lead him to disdain humanity. Raskolnikov is split between an emotion ego and a logic ego. The conflict between these two sides of his character drives him insane and causes him to sink into apathy until one personality wins out over the other.…

    • 5830 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rasconikov Duality

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rasconikov’s isolated, detached, sneaky and disconnected side is when most of his intellectual scheming goes on. There is never any spontaneous moves when in this state, but more so every action being premeditated. This side of his personality is where he strategizes his theories about crime and how to commit it. Raskolnikov believes that the “extraordinary” are able to be independent, and not influenced by others on the outside, but only being influenced by oneself, being self-sufficient without company or the hand of another, which explains why his intellectual side is very isolated.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both characters reject ordinary standards and morals; good and evil are ambiguous, and they are pressured both socially and emotionally. “ … I am eking out my days in my corner, taunting myself with the bitter and entirely useless consolation that an intelligent man cannot seriously become anything; that only a fool can become something.” as indicated in this quote, the underground man believes that “an intelligent man” is incapable of becoming prominent. “Yes, sir, an intelligent nineteenth century man must be, is morally bound to be, an essentially characterless creature; and a man of character, a man of action-an essentially limited creature.”, the quote is an elaboration on the character’s previous statement; he defines “an intelligent man” that is contrary to the norm. Correspondingly, “‘The old woman was only an illness.... I was in a hurry to overstep.... I didn't kill a human being, but a principle!’”, as stated in the novel, Raskolnikov has a different moral perspective on humans too. Being a killer, to justify his actions, Raskolnikov considers his victim as “an illness” and “principle”; she was merely a human to him. They both possess distinct views on humans, contrasting the standard…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Raskolnikov's Quest

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dostoevsky does not let the reader understand, until later on in the novel, that Raskolnikov had been thinking and planning out this evil for long period of time. Raskolnikov believes of himself be a sort of Napoleon figure in his community and that his action of murder will set people free from the suffering of their poor lives. But the opposite occurs, Raskolnikov does not become free from his suffering, he begins to face a fast descent into a psychotic break. Dostoevsky is trying to show the readers that you cannot combat suffering with sin and evil tendencies. Raskolnikov chose the easy way out; he chose to go against God and take matters into his own hands and ultimately suffers even more in his life because of…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Raskolnikov confesses to the murder of Alyona and Lizaveta, he is sentenced to eight-years in a prison camp in Siberia, where he is forced to perform hard labor. Despite his confession, he still has not repented for his actions and refuses to surrender his heart, body, and soul completely to God. Even now, he still believes he did not commit anything inherently wrong or sinful. At this point, nothing has really changed significantly other than his environment--simply, same old feelings, just a different place. Due to his pride, he is obsessed with the idea that he is superior and “extraordinary” (249).…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Raskolinikov is able to forgive himself easier once he has the time to reflect and serve his punishment. After committing the crime Raskolinikov eventually accepts that he must suffer the consequences, by law or by his own mental prowess; "If he has a conscience he will suffer for his mistake. That will be punishment - as well as the prison" (Dostoyevsky 230). The human brain dictates that all actions should have either a logical or emotional purpose, Raskolinikov struggles to find a good enough reason and his mind endures the penalty, until he is properly punished and serves out his sentence in Siberia with a quiet mind and a happy ending with Sonya to look forward…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fyodor Dostoevsky’s “Crime and Punishment” often alludes to the still-blossoming ideas of moral relativism, especially concerning a conversation that acts as a precursor to Raskolnikov's crime. Within this dispute between two men in a bar, they discuss a woman, Alyona Ivanovna, and her sister Lizaveta: one states that the world would be better off without Alyona, who continuously beats her sister and “wearing out the lives of others”, and the other states that there is a natural order to the world. The man against Alyona declares, “A hundred thousand good deeds could be done and helped, on that old woman’s money….kill her, take her money… would not one tiny crime be wiped out by thousands of good deeds?” (Dostoevsky, 67). In this, we see two sides to one’s moral compass: one harvests the idea that the killing of Alyona is completely justified due to the fact that she is greedy and spiteful towards others, especially her kind, gentle sister.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. Raskolnikov is ‘exposes’ Luzhin’s motives and yet he wouldn’t want anyone to expose that he murdered the pawnbroker.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Nobody, but he who has felt it, can conceive what a plaguing thing it is to have a man’s mind torn asunder by two projects of equal strength, both obstinately pulling in contrary direction at the time.” (Laurence Sterne) In Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment, it is this exact miscalculation that leads the protagonist Raskolnikov (Rodya) to his ultimate mental, physical and social demise. Similarly, the theme of the novel directly correlates to Sterne’s quote, as Dostoyevsky delves into the psychology of a criminal, centering the novel on a murder and its after-affects on the transgressor.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book “Crime and Punishment”, Dostoevsky explores the path of Raskolnikov who has faced many difficulties and obstacles throughout his life. He commits murder and is faced with the long and extremely painful journey of seeking redemption. Raskolnikov believes that by the law of nature, men have been divided into two groups of “ordinary” and “extraordinary”.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guilt

    • 295 Words
    • 1 Page

    When one suffers with a great deal of guilt, their physical health quickly deteriorates. Raskolnikov's physical suffering begins shortly after the murder with delusions and nonsense ravings while constantly drifting in and out of reality.…

    • 295 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although it’s hard to know what he was like before the novel started, it can be inferred that he wasn’t always insane. Poverty and anger drove a man who used to be a hardworking university student to commit a murder and lose his sanity. From the opening of the book, his paranoia is evident. Raskolnikov seemed to have no other objective besides worrying about the thoughts of others. This paranoia is part of what makes him so impulsive. In many parts of the book, he allows his insanity to think for him. Raskolnikov’s dreams and hallucinations come after the paranoia and impulsiveness. They truly show how alone he is. The real-life connection between sanity and interaction with people is evident in Crime and Punishment. As Raskolnikov begins to talk to people again, his mental state gets better. His mind is at its worst when he is alone. If Raskolnikov had friends to rely on from the beginning, Crime and Punishment might have been a very different…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays