Analysis Of An Argumentative Writer
Thank you for teaching me on how to become a better argumentative writer. Writing has always been easy for me, especially when it came to summaries, rhetorical, and synthesis essays. Honestly, I never would have admitted how much I struggled with grasping the strongest way to argument an opinion without being utterly biased or incompetent with providing efficient evidence to support my claims. Having the opportunity to develop my skills as a writer through the two argumentative research papers has been an amazing and reflective experience.
The most transitional flaw that I had to change was with distributing my opinion across the paper with enough evidence to support what I was trying to argue. My issue was that I did not always used the appropriate or strongest evidence to credit what I stated, hence making my arguments weak or incomplete. Particularly with our technology-related paper, I struggled with using unsupportive information to argue along with my ideas. It was not because I did not know what information to utilized, but rather I did not know how to identify what information was more appropriate to use. So when a specific quotation did not relate too to the thesis and topic of a paragraph, I made the decision to alter my thesis, paragraph, and evidence. Many revisions and peer readings that gave me …show more content…
Composition 2 has revolutionized my understanding of what it takes to make writing a powerful tool. The most amazing aspect of this course was for me to see the ways I grew in how I wrote, and what I wrote for, especially with the affirmative action paper. In practicality, I learned how to choose more supporting evidence from a vast collection of articles. Intellectually, I acquired the ability to understand what mattered to me, why it did, and how writing can bring forth a second opinion to many who may have opposed
The most transitional flaw that I had to change was with distributing my opinion across the paper with enough evidence to support what I was trying to argue. My issue was that I did not always used the appropriate or strongest evidence to credit what I stated, hence making my arguments weak or incomplete. Particularly with our technology-related paper, I struggled with using unsupportive information to argue along with my ideas. It was not because I did not know what information to utilized, but rather I did not know how to identify what information was more appropriate to use. So when a specific quotation did not relate too to the thesis and topic of a paragraph, I made the decision to alter my thesis, paragraph, and evidence. Many revisions and peer readings that gave me …show more content…
Composition 2 has revolutionized my understanding of what it takes to make writing a powerful tool. The most amazing aspect of this course was for me to see the ways I grew in how I wrote, and what I wrote for, especially with the affirmative action paper. In practicality, I learned how to choose more supporting evidence from a vast collection of articles. Intellectually, I acquired the ability to understand what mattered to me, why it did, and how writing can bring forth a second opinion to many who may have opposed