Preview

Analysis: Justice Delayed Is Justice Buried

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1037 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis: Justice Delayed Is Justice Buried
JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED BUT IS JUSTICE HURRIED IS JUSTICE BURIED?
The two judicial phrases written above are in contradiction to each other but when they are brought to strict interpretation they highlight out the infirmities present in the legal system of our country. If we follow the first phrase ‘Justice Delayed is Justice Denied’ we will ensure speedy trial and quick relief delivery to the victim in a case, the other phrase ‘Justice Hurried is Justice Buried’ when followed will make the judicial system to do things which ensure that every corner of the case has been looked into so that a decision is taken in the best spirit of equity, justice and good consciousness as we all know and expect from the judiciary.
A lot is expected
…show more content…
There, are many factors which makes this phrase a truth these are, (i) Strength of Judges are inadequate as per the number of cases, (ii) the infrastructure is poor, (iii) the incompetency of other staff in the courts, (iv) delay done by the investigative agencies, (v) corrupt practices going on in the courts. If these points of backwardness are not being addressed properly there will be many short comes which will be faced by the system in the near future and they will be add-ons in the already existing problems of the judicial …show more content…
Commissioner of Consolidation & Ors. [76 (1993) CLT 161] we can see the usage of this phrase. Therefore, it is the duty of the judiciary to look into every matter in a manner which establishes and satisfies all the aspects of the applicable laws avoiding setting up of a bad precedent. This phrase is a catch for judiciary and also ensures that the main objective which is ‘hundreds of guilty should be left but not one innocent should be sentenced’ and therefore, following this phrase is the best what the judiciary can do to achieve its

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Individuals overlook the importance of legal history because the central emphasis is on the current state of law. It is vital to recognize that today’s equitable judicial system was not formed through one rapid notion but rather many unconventional propositions extending over a period of…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary objection against the Judges’ Case model of appointments is that it finds no basis in constitutional text and is the product of a frenetic Court. Secondly, it places a potent CJP at the center of the judicial system, which severely compromises independence within the judiciary. The primacy accorded to his opinion further facilitated the judiciary’s transformation into a self-perpetuating institution. It also served to politicize the judiciary, which eroded the judiciary’s institutional impression in the public eye. Moreover, the lack of clarity surrounding the application of the seniority principle allowed room for maneuvering, making an already opaque procedure more indefinite and obscure. All of these observations confirm that…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When an individual becomes a victim of crime, it may lead to serious triggers and consequences after the fact. In fact, after victimization most victims may feel lost and have a difficult time when it comes to treatment and recovering from their victimization experience. In some cases, individuals do not report their incidents to the police, let alone, seek help and treatment. The main reason this may happen is because they are not quite sure where to search for guidance or the appropriate alternative methods that are essential to take after becoming a victim of crime. This becomes more problematic and challenging for the victim because they are…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is one of the major effects of mandatory minimum sentencing in that it limits judicial discretion of the most serious crimes in the criminal justice system. What is problematic in this instance is that without variation the role of judges, their highly respected reasoning in balancing competing values, and understanding of the law is compromised because of these restrictions in sentencing. Has this discretion completely vanished? Athar Malik explains that as a result, “what little discretion remains in the hands of the judge, now gives the Crown an inordinate amount of power.” Mandatory minimum sentencing may also increase the pressure to plead guilty, whereby the discretion wielded by the Crown is “hidden from public view” which in turn may reduce accountability and allow systemic discrimination to be perpetuated. Hence, mandatory minimums distort the role of the prosecutor, turning him from an advocate into a quasi-judge and this is neither desirable nor appropriate in our judicial system. This is problematic as this limits taking into account varying aggravating and mitigating factors unique to each case. Consequently, with the imposition of mandatory minimum sentencing, judges have become accustomed to imposing prison terms as the norm and with the passage of time there will be fewer judges who will adopt a…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The existence of conflicting perspectives in society is inevitable as there are an infinite amount of truths that are developed by an individual’s understanding of an idea. It is important to note that truth is constructed, not found and is entirely subjective as different perceptions of truth are influenced by culture, religion, lifestyle, interest and the sort. Geoffrey Robertson’s nonfiction text, The Justice Game and David Braithwaite’s feature article “Chaser Comic Convoy beats summit security” highlights the expected conflicts in perspectives through the issues of corruption of the law and obscenity accompanied by the overarching theme of “truths”. They explore the manipulation of how truths can mislead and warp meaning, thus creating perspectives that generate diverse and provocative insights.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Report

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    McBarnet’s discussion of the criminal court system focuses around the idea that the higher courts such as the District and the Supreme courts are for public consumption in which the ideology of justice is played up by the more elaborate court rooms, dress, and rigid rules of ceremony. On the other hand the lower courts focus on control. The local courts handle the vast bulk of cases with only a small proportion of criminal cases coming before the higher courts. For example the National division of cases between the lower and higher courts in 2003-2004 were 97% finalised in the lower courts while only 3% were heard in higher courts.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The outline of this essay will be discussing these fundamental issues (i) The importance of the courts also conversing about guilty pleas of defendants (ii) the adversarial and inquisitorial theories of criminal justice (iii) the procedure of convicts moving from court to conviction. This paper will conclude that the complexity of the criminal justice system is effective but ignoring its full potential, a system that strongly avoids trial may not be a completely effective way of criminal justice. The courts have an invaluable role in the justice system.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What if you Were Boss

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The judicial courts is one of the most difficult undertaking out of all the judicial system. Even though law enforcement officers apprehend offenders, it is still up to the prosecutors to retrieve and analyze all evidence from the scene of the crime that the officers collected, so that they can compile a case against the defendant. Then there is the defense also gathering information to make a case to prove the defendant is innocent. Now if I was the boss for the day I would make some changes to help make both sides more successful.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I learned many new things from this video. I learned that many people died in the black’s non-violent revolution for freedom and rights. I also learned that most African Americans were paid an average of only about $700. African Americans were denied education at all white schools, and were only allowed a less than average education at black schools. Under the Supreme Court ruling in Brown vs. Board of Education, a number of African American Honors students integrated Little Rock Central High School in 1957. Every day they had to endure abuse from a huge angry mob that protested integration and wanted segregation. I feel that I would not have been able to put up with all that abuse. Those nine students that integrated Central High had great determination and never gave up hope. I also learned that it was a very long and hard struggle for all blacks during the Civil Rights Movement. The KKK terrorized blacks and killed them. Many African Americans were killed before they won the rights that they deserve. I was very proud of all the African Americans that participated in things like the Montgomery bus boycott because it showed that they weren’t afraid of standing up for themselves. I felt joyful that they always had the courage to stay non-violent, because if they turned to violence, the situation would not have turned out the same way. Now I will do anything that I can to eliminate discrimination of anyone because it is a very serious and destructive…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Americans have a choice whether they want to stand up for others or to stay neutral, we are not required to fight the battle of others but in my opinion we should help others in need. If you don’t stand up for justice of all people you are technically letting it happen but it doesn’t mean you support injustice or propose it upon others. If you see injustice happening what do you do? Do you step in or do you let it go? I think it depends on the situation, if it is someone that can’t fend for themselves then yes I believe you should step in, if someone is harming another to better themselves someone should step in.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cherokee Indian Removal

    • 4670 Words
    • 19 Pages

    If it be true that wrongs have been inflicted, and that still greater are to be apprehended, this is not the tribunal which can redress the past or prevent the future. #6…

    • 4670 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    inescapable. Mahatma Gandhi once said that, "There is a higher court than courts of justice and…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due process perspective, believe that the justice system should be dedicated to providing fair and equitable treatment to those accused of crime. This means providing impartial hearings, competent legal counsel, evenhanded treatment, and reasonable sanctions to ensure that no one suffers from racial, religious, or ethnic discrimination and that their basic constitutional rights are respected…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin Partington, when writing about the Criminal cases Review Commission, declared that “One of the most serious challenges facing the criminal justice system is ensuring that miscarriages of justice do not occur”, (Partington, Introduction to the English Legal System, Oxford University Press, 2012/13 (7th ed.) at page 135.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justice is a concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law, natural law, religion, equity and fairness.…

    • 3367 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics