Preview

Analysis Alternative Dispute Resolution

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1955 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Alternative Dispute Resolution
Discuss the processes available in alternative dispute resolution and explain its advantages and disadvantages.

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) involves dispute resolution processes and techniques that fall outside of the government judicial process. There has been moves against ADR in the past by entities of many political parties and their associates, despite this, ADR has gained inclusive acceptance among both the broad community and the legal profession in past years. In fact, many courts now entail some parties to remedy to ADR of some type, usually mediation, before allowing the parties ' cases to be tried. The increasing attractiveness of ADR can be clarified by the increasing caseload of traditional courts, the perception that ADR imposes fewer costs than litigation, a preference for confidentiality, and the desire of some parties to obtain larger control over the selection of the individual or individuals who will decide their dispute.
ADR holds an extensive, easily influenced and diverging choice of processes for finding solutions for disputes which are personified by structured negotiation and consensus. It is regarded that arbitration is a familiar ADR technique, however, it is a more of a official adjudicative and adversary technique – initially a confidential litigation process – which has more commonality to litigation than the more original consensual processes which symbolise ADR. As simplified by Angyal (Alternative Dispute Resolution, 1987, p. 11):
"The key difference between ADR and those traditional techniques of litigation and arbitration is that ADR techniques are used to produce a resolution to dispute through a negotiated agreement while litigation and arbitration are processes by which a result is imposed on the parties."
We can say that many issues arise with terms. A past Chief Justice of Supreme Court of New South Wales and one of Australia 's powerful proponents of ADR, named Sir Laurence Street, has commented that:
"

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bus Law 531 Week 1

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) over the years has grown in popularity with over 90% of all cases resolved through some form of ADR. The advantages of ADR over trial include such things, as it is less formal and less intimidating. ADR has a more rapid resolution and is less expensive and is normally heard by an arbitrator or mediator. ADR enables parties to address underlying issues and interests. It permits more creative and flexible solutions. Trial by comparison is a more formal process. Traditional litigation requires that a complaint is filed in the court and the plaintiff most respond. This is followed by a pre-trial and a trial in which each party is allowed to present their case and it is settled either by jury or a judge. Trials are also a slower process and require a higher amount of time, more expensive, and as well as stress and emotional disarray. In traditional litigation businesses may get certain documents, testimony, and other evidence, which may not apply to ADR…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law/531 Adr Analysis

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For many years, litigation has been the one thing in reference to the law that traditionally resolves lawsuits and disputes. There are many facts that need to be considered when one compares or contrasts traditional litigation methods to the nontraditional litigation methods (Alternate Dispute Resolution). Handled outside of litigation in court, ADR is a unique resolution. ADR’s types include “arbitration, collaborative law, mediation and negotiation. Conciliation is sometimes included as a fifth category” (Alternate Dispute Resolution Law, 2011).…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jennings, M. (2006). Managing Disputes: Alternative Dispute Resolution and Litigation Strategies. Business: Its Legal, Ethical, and Global Environment. p111-118, p130.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arbitration is a relatively fast way to arrive upon a decision when two parties are in a dispute. Arbitration has definite benefits such as being flexible and not as formal as a traditional courthouse. Usually, arbitration can be scheduled quicker and with less working parts than a trial. In rare instances, if all parties involved come to an agreement, arbitrators can sometimes create rulings that judges are not allowed to decide. In arbitration, both sides present all evidence to an arbitrator in efforts to prove each side’s case. The arbitrator reaches a final verdict and decides whom the winners and losers are. An arbitrator does the job that a traditional judge or jury would normally do in court if the matter escalated to that point (Hill…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") refers to any means of settling disputes outside of the courtroom. ADR typically includes early neutral evaluation, negotiation, conciliation, mediation, and arbitration. As burgeoning court queues, rising costs of litigation, and time delays continue to plague litigants, more states have begun experimenting with ADR programs. Some of these programs are voluntary; others are mandatory.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most common forms of ADR which are available are – Negotiation (It is a simple procedure in which parties involved in dispute discuss with each other to reach a voluntary settlement.),Mediation (In this method, the parties use a mediator to propose a settlement of their dispute), Arbitration ( In it, the parties chooses a third party to hear evidence and testimony and then decide the dispute), Mini-trial (In it, lawyers from both parties present their case to representatives of each party so that parties can know strengths and weaknesses of their cases.), Fact-finding(the parties employs a neutral third party who act as fact-finder for the investigation of case and the information investigated by Fact-finder can be used in negotiating settlement.), Using a Judicial Referee (With the parties agreement, the court may appoint a judicial referee to conduct a private trial and give a judgment and their decisions stand as judgments of the court). (Cheeseman,…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While courts provide an essential service to our society, there are times when taking an issue before a court is not the best option. Litigation can be costly and time consuming; which is why Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has become a valued form of handling legal matters, as it can help resolve a case more quickly and economically (Alford & Kaufman, 1999). Understanding ADR involves recognizing its purpose, looking to see how it can be applied in a situation, and supporting and understanding the provisions for which an ADR can effectively take place.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There will be two ways of facilitating an ADR in the event of a dispute…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ADR includes processes and techniques that act as a means for disagreeing parties to come to an agreement. Despite historic resistance to ADR, it has gained widespread acceptance among both the general public and the legal profession in recent years. The most common form of ADR is arbitration. Other forms of ADR are negotiation, mediation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding, and using a judicial referee (Cheesman, 2010). The most effective method that will suit the needs of our learning team is the mediation method. If an agreement cannot be reached during the mediation process, then the arbitration method will be utilized.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Litigation vs. Mediation

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander is involved in a dispute related to his business. Alexander is considering legal action. Why may it be financially advantageous to Alexander’s business to avoid litigation and mediate the case? The expense of time and money associated with Alexander’s business decision to consider legal action can be avoided through mediation per our text book Business Law which suggest that litigation is often an inefficient way to resolve business-related disputes . According to our book, three basic methods that can be implemented are negotiation, mediation, and arbitration (Business Law 3rd Edition,2010, p62-63).…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, having laws in place facilitates the discussion and resolutions of disputes. In business these resolutions can become very costly to the business, but through methods of dispute resolutions such as alternative dispute resolution (ADR) businesses may remedy the dispute without going through legal battles in a court system. The same applies for disputes in society, as disputes arise, having a guide and understanding of the law allows separate parties to come to a mutual agreement through…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is an important aspect of the court’s structure in that it allows disputes to be resolved without the need for litigation. The different types of this key alternative will be discussed along with a pros and cons of each alternative type. A personal perspective of how ADR has worked for me in the past will be included as well as what type was used.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ENV320Final

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Briefly describe two alternatives to civil litigation indicating how they are used (one sentence for each alternative). Mediation allows two parties in to utilize a neutral third party to resolve their dispute. Arbitration is a little like court and mediation because again a neutral third party is used, but this time the third party makes a ruling on the case that is upheld by the court.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    J. Braithwaite writes, "Court-annexed ADR (alternative dispute resolution) and restorative justice could not be philosophically further apart", because the former seeks to address only legally relevant issues and to protect both parties' rights, whereas restorative justice seeks "expanding the issues beyond those that are legally relevant, especially into underlying relationships."[8]…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Solving disputes in the legal realm can be a very complicated and costly endeavor, and it is important to recognize the most effective method to reach a reasonable solution. Traditional litigation and ADR are both effective means of solving such a dispute. When comparing and contrasting the best way to solve a civil dispute, it is very important to first determine which would be more beneficial, traditional litigation or ADR. Both have many benefits and both have drawbacks, however it is the civil dispute that should determine which is the most beneficial.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays