Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Analyse the Role of the Female Character in an Inspector Calls

Good Essays
935 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyse the Role of the Female Character in an Inspector Calls
Analyse the role of the female characters in An Inspector Calls

Priestley includes a range of female characters in An Inspector Calls from an upper class snob, through a vain daughter to an oppressed factory worker. Throughout this play, the selfishness and moral hypocrisy of upper middle-class capitalist society is revealed. The vulnerability of women evokes sympathy, which supports Priestley’s belief in gender equality and community as “one body”.

At the beginning of the play, Sybil Birling is physically distant from her husband as they sit at each end of the dinner table. This symbolizes the tension between them, which is a result of a power struggle: Mrs Birling feels socially superior due to her higher class to him; but as a woman, is required to submit to him. Thus she tells Mr Birling he is “ not supposed to say such things-“ and he more or less disregards her. This form of snobbery gradually develops to a point later in the play when she calls Eva a “girl of that sort.” She represents the ignorant older capitalist generation that Priestley implies was responsible for the inequality of the society at that time and which led to the younger generation suffering in “ fire and blood and anguish.”

Like her mother, Sheila represents a female stereotype of 1912: she is frivolous, vain and proud, “Very pleased with life.” She is more concerned with the ring than the actual engagement: “I think it’s perfect. Now I really feel engaged.” This demonstrates her superficiality. From the beginning of the play Sheila is seen as an oblivious, self-satisfied lady, unaware of her surroundings. As the inspector’s interrogation begins the audience feels the change taken place in Sheila, from asking “pretty?” to arguing “ But these girls aren’t cheap labour-they’re people.” She therefore progressively shows compassion for Eva. Priestley uses Sheila as an example of the people who exploit their high status to put people down. Despite all of these, Sheila confesses her moral crime, “enters, looks as if she’s been crying.” She feels remorseful, “It was my own fault.” Which seems immoral in her parent’s eyes. As this splits the family; it also shows the split between capitalism and socialism. As the inspector leaves, the audience no longer perceives a shallow, materialistic girl, but more of a mature, independent, post-war woman. “If you want to know it’s you two who are being childish-trying not to face the facts.” She has grown out of the immature spoilt girl that she appeared to be at the beginning of the play.” Don't interfere, please father. Gerald knows what I mean, and you apparently don't.” As throughout the pay Priestley shows hints that there is hope in the younger generation as they are more aware of their responsibilities and are willing to learn. Sheila was to reflect on women’s independence. She mocks her parent’s stupidity with a sarcastic attitude as she says bitterly “ I suppose we’re all nice people now.” The progression from capitalism to socialism is less important to Sheila but more of the progression of women from seen and not heard, to heard and seen as much as or more than men which Priestley strongly believed in gender equality. (Sheila’s own personal attitude was probably what a lot of young women’s attitude and behavior was like
The ordinariness of the name “Eva” could possibly refer to the first woman created by God - Eve or the archetypal woman. The most common surname of Smith may represent every woman of the working class and womankind. The fact that she never appears on stage makes her the driving force of the play. Eva Smith was in a terrible position back when the society did not value women and women were not given the rights to vote. As a working class, a job was crucial, there was no social security at that time and without a job meant no financial income. Prostitution was one of the few choices that a woman could turn to. The attitude towards Eva was the attitude given to women of the working class at that period of time. The audience may not have undergone the harshness of Eva’s Life, but we see a small glimpse as we hear the stories of her numerous sufferings. The audience is invited to reside on Eva’s vulnerability and sufferings as she goes through an exploitative employer, two men sexually abusing her, her powerlessness caused by her gender, class and poverty. The contrast between Eva Smith and Sheila Birling created by Priestley is significant. Both characters are around the same age, both female, but came from opposite backgrounds. Sheila has a higher social status while Eva is from the lowest class. Priestley made the audience feel more sympathetic towards Eva without the need to meet her character. The contrast itself makes the Birling’s actions towards Eva even more unjustified. For Sheila had a nicer lifestyle and more advantages while Eva had the complete opposite.

It is therefore clear that, the role of the three different women is very different. It does however have similarities. Women at this time were not equal to men; and this can be seen through each character’s role. Mrs. Birling is interrupted and put down by her husband, Sheila is told to calm down and immoral men harassed Eva Smith. This is plainly depicted with each character and her role, this enforces the belief at that time that women were not equal to men, no matter the class.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mrs Birling Analysis

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The general form and structure of the play enhances Mrs. Birling’s character to an extent. By placing her second last in the line of enquiry, the impact of her actions is greater on the victim than other characters. She enters amidst a dramatic pause, when Sheila is trying to examine the Inspector, ‘…I don’t understand about you...’ to which the Inspector says, ‘There’s no reason why you should’. This adds on to the audience’s curiosity making them think what’s to come.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As soon as they meet in act one, Birling attempts to show his social superiority to the Inspector, boasting about his contacts in the police force, this shows Birlings character and the type of person he is, big headed and boastfull. Within the play Mr and Mrs Birling seems to be the only characters that are unable to accept the fact that they helped in the death of eva smith. In contrast to Mr and Mrs Birling Sheila has total opposite views and realises what she did was wrong, and wishes that she could go back and never get Eva sacked-…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Mr Birling, the next character the Inspector questions is Sheila. Although Sheila is a young girl, she is of a high class, so she does therefore have some power. She too abuses her power and orders to have Eva Smith fired from her job when shopping because Sheila thought Eva was laughing at her. She says ‘If she was a pathetic looking…

    • 759 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    J.B Priestley was born in Bradford, Yorkshire on 13th September 1894. He firm believer of socialism which is a political theory or system in which the means of production and distribution are controlled by the people therefore he disagrees firmly with capitalism. Priestley set his play in 1912 because the date symbolized an period when all was very unusual from the time he was writing. In 1912, inflexible class and gender restrictions seemed to guarantee that nothing would change. However by 1945 the majority of class and gender divisions had been infringed. Priestley wanted to make the most of these changes. The Inspector wants to teach the Birling Family to care about other and not only themselves and he wants to show that social status and wealth are not significant factors. One of Priestley’s major concerns was that even that the war has ended people were living in poverty and living depressed lives. I think that J.B Priestley is trying to tell people that they shouldn’t rejoice after the war because several people have been killed. Priestley shows that there shouldn’t be a division between people of different class. In 1912 the Birling family lead a comfortable life Birling is a prime example of a capitalist, J.B Priestley is keen to highlight the selfishness of him in the play. J.B Priestley wanted to highlight what was right and wrong in society as it is a morality play .In this essay I am going to investigate how J.B Priestley uses dramatic devices to intrigue the audience.…

    • 820 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    J.B. Priestley wrote ‘An Inspector calls’ at the height of his powers as a playwright. The plays purpose it to deliver a pro-socialist message to the audience. The writer does this by using dramatic devices to convey his concerns and ideas to members of the audience. It is a political drama, aimed at the upper and middle classes, since they were the most likely to see the play.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The playwright of “An Inspector Calls,” J.B. Priestley, was a dedicated supporter of socialism, and by writing this play, he vents his own opinions and attitudes through his characters. The play is set in 1912, two years prior to the First World War, in the home of a prosperous manufacturer, Arthur Birling. It is perceptible to the reader that a prevailing aspect of the play is Capitalism versus socialism. This theme centres on Arthur Birling, a Capitalist.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    'An Inspector Calls' is a play which explores social inequality in postwar Britain. Priestley uses many dramatic devices such as stage directions, dramatic irony, lighting and setting to expose what he perceives to be the ills of excessive Capitalism. Eva Smith personifies the victimisation of the British working class and women.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book An Inspector Calls the character Sheila has more of an impact and changes her views on things. The writer, Priestley, uses Sheila as someone who helps the audience follow the play by what she says.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Priestley’s portrays Mrs Birling as a snobbish, cold-hearted and unsympathetic woman but she pretends to be sympathetic towards Eva Smiths’ death. Yet she was the one who worked in the women’s charity organisation and refused to help her in the first place - highlighting her harsh and uncaring nature. Also, Mrs Birling feigns to be oblivious towards her son’s drinking and pretends that she is an eloquent, sophisticated and well-mannered woman.nevertheless; the way she behaves to inspector Goole is one of rudeness, disrespect and impertinence.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Birlings are a family of wealth and power, who take pride in their high social position. Mr. Birling is a successful businessman, and the family inhabits a nice home with a maid (and likely other servants). The play begins with the family celebrating and feeling generally pleased with themselves and their fortunate circumstance. Throughout the Inspector’s investigation, however, it comes out that several of the Birlings have used their power and influence immorally, in disempowering and worsening the position of a girl from a lower class: Mr. Birling used his high professional position to force Eva Smith out of his factory when she led a faction of workers in demanding a raise; Sheila, in a bad temper, used her social status and her family’s…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr birling later voices his happiness at the fact he will gain great wealth from his daughters marriage, despite the fact that marriages at that time were for wealth rather than love Sheila still resents the fact that he shows no interest in her feelings, whereas a modern father would always put his daughter’s happiness first without fail. “For lower costs and higher prices” makes clear Mr birling’s intentions clear. “Neither do I. All wrong” shows Sheila's continuous presentation of respect for her parents, no matter what she really feels. Priestley continues to show the façade that the upper class present, as well as the lack of love shown in Edwardian families where as far as a parent is concerned money is the most important thing in their life.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sheila Birling Changes

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At the end of the play, it is clear that Sheila has matured and take more authority from away from her parents. When the family learns that the Inspector wasn’t isn’t real Sheila says to her parents ‘You knew it them. You began to learn something. And now you’ve stopped.’ Priestley’s use of tripling highlights Sheila’s strong desire for change and her determination to persuade her parents to change their ideologies and spread the Inspector’s views. Furthermore, the use of the personal pronoun ‘you’ demonstrates how Sheila evidently distances herself away from her parents, insinuating her desire for a lack of association with them. She realises she doesn’t want to be influenced by their views as she knows they are wrong, therefore highlighting the contrast between Sheila and her parent’s attitudes as well as Priestley’s desire for the younger generation to understand what is wrong and actively change to make it…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though they were upper class they only had a few more rights than the working class, only because they’re women, so gender does play an important part in the play ‘An Inspector Calls’. The theme of gender is just as important as social class and age as well because Sheila was upper class too just like Mr.Birling, Gerald and Eric but she was a lot more mature and open minded than all of this in terms of accepting responsibility for her actions, and also her attitude towards gender. Unlike the rest of the family Sheila doesn’t separate lower class women from herself and her family as she says, “But…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Priestley uses the setting time and the time he actually wrote the play to highlight the themes of responsibility between the two eras. Pre-1912, people were very harsh when it came to helping and this was a time when Capitalism was rampant. There was a very large gap between the rich and poor, and Priestley used this to emphasize how bad things were back in 1912 and how change would be better. As in 1945, people were becoming more of a community and people helped one another, the idea of Capitalism and not caring about anyone dwindled as Socialism became more and more accepted.…

    • 846 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off Sheila can be self centered. One reason she is self centered is she talks about herself often. When Sheila and the boy are moving down the river she talks and talks about herself, and the boy never has much of a chance to talk to her about himself. She can also be considered self centered, because she did not want to get in the canoe with the boy. This quote helps explain this, “ ‘Look,’ she said. ‘I can get Dad’s car.’ ‘It’s faster this way,’ I lied. ‘Parking’s tense up there. Hey, it’s safe. I won’t tip it or anything.’ She let herself down reluctantly into the bow” (Wetherall 2). This demonstrates that she is looking for a way to travel how she wants, because she “reluctantly” (Wetherell 2) lets herself down into the boat. Another time she is self centered is the way she acts. While she is on a float she has several body positions, and each one means a certain thing. These positions are, “If she lay flat on the diving board with her had training idly in the water… that her various suitors found the courage to come near” (Wetherell 1). This shows that she is self centered by acting, only some of you can come near me, or do not disturb me. Sheila can also be considered rude. At one point in the story she claims that “fishing’s dumb,’ she said making a face. ‘I mean, it’s boring and all. Definitely dumb’ “ (Wetherell 3). She acts rude when not considering others feelings who might enjoy the activity. Another time she acts rude is when she goes into the canoe. In the canoe there are two paddles, and the boy had one. The other paddle was lying in the boat and Sheila did not pick it up and help paddle. Instead she sat in the canoe as if paddling was not good enough of a task for her to do. The last rude action Sheila performs is at the end of the story when she leaves the show and goes home with someone else. This is the quote, “all I really…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays