Preview

Analyse the Limitations on the Powers of the Prime Minister.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
770 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyse the Limitations on the Powers of the Prime Minister.
Analyse the limitations on the powers of the prime minister.

There are limitations to the prime ministers powers, despite the prime minister role being the highest in UK politics. The prime minister still maintains many powers but one main limitation that there is, is the prime ministers’ party.
Ministerial appointments require some recognition of the need for political balance and administrative competence. There is pressure from colleagues or the media to appoint certain people- all Prime Ministers at least listen to advice from senior colleagues before making appointments. The Prime Ministers ability to control the flow of business is restricted. Apart from drawing up the party manifesto, most Prime Ministers do not initiate policy- they have a small staff and most expertise and detailed information is located in individual departments

If the prime minister loses support of their party, he also indirectly loses the ability to pass bills. A good example of a party turning against their leader was when Thatcher was governing the country. A knock on effect of this would be the country will lose confidence in this party and its leader because citizens will start to believe that the lack of harmony in the party will start to reflect on the nation.

Another factor that limits a Prime Minister's power is the fact that he is seen to be publicly responsible for any major mishap that occurs during his time in power. The American President, Richard Nixon had a plaque on his desk which stated "the buck stops here". As the Prime Minister is the person in charge, the buck stops with him. When things go well, the Prime Minister can bath in the glory but the opposite is also true. As the most known member of the government, it is he that the public hold to be accountable when things go wrong. Anthony Eden was held responsible for the Suez episode in 1956; Edward Heath was seen as the person responsible for the 1974 miners’ strike when a three-day working week was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Assess the view that, in practice, presidential power is restricted to issues relating to foreign policy.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Summary

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12: The Presidency I. Presidents and prime ministers A. Characteristics of parliaments 1. Parliamentary system twice as common 2. Chief executive chosen by legislature 3. Cabinet ministers chosen from among members of parliament 4. Prime minister remains in power as long as his or her party or coalition maintains a majority in the legislature B. Differences 5. Presidents are often outsiders; prime ministers are always insiders, chosen by party members in parliament 6. Presidents choose their cabinet from outside Congress; prime ministers choose members of parliament 7. Presidents have no guaranteed majority in the legislature; prime ministers…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another argument for is that because there is a coalition government, this leads to parliament being split, leading to no overall majority. This then means that disagreement could occur, which could have been avoided in the first place if only one party was involved. If the Prime Minister had complete power, then the decision would have been easier and they could have decided the outcome with their party. However the Prime Minister now has to consider the other parties views, and has to share his/ her powers with other…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article II of the United States Constitution gives the president the role of ‘Commander-in-Chief’ of the US’s Armed Forces, and this role provides the basis for rapid and effective decision-making, whilst maintaining the credibility of the USA’s foreign policy on the world stage. However, there are certain constraints on the President’s role as Commander-in-Chief’. One constraint on this power is that only Congress has the power to declare war. Congress can also authorise the president to deploy his country’s armed forces. Since the Constitution was created, Congress has only declared war a total of five times (in both World Wars, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, and the Spanish-American War), and this power has not been used since 1941. These authorisations are ordered by the President however, showing just how interlinked the powers of the president and Congress really are. One example of when the timing of a congressional authorisation can be crucial is the vote on action against Iraq, a few months before the 2002 midterm elections. This congressional authorisation was manipulated by George W Bush, and shows that the president can take advantage of this and make a decision with a Congress that has a majority of his party as members, rather than waiting until after a midterm when he might not be so sure as to have a key decision go his way. The relationship between Congress and the president was confirmed by the War Powers Act of 1973, passed in the aftermath of the Vietnam War.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is logical to assume that a Prime Minister’s degree of power will be very dependent on the size of majority his party enjoys in the House of Commons. In the case of Blair, he enjoyed a very large one, with 63.4% of the seats filled by Labour MPs. Since the party won the right to govern, the Prime Minister carries all the elective authority with him. Also, with little opposition, it allows the Prime Minister to exercise his powers more efficiently, which would undoubtedly be very helpful when wanting to pass new laws. Cameron in turn, should expect to enjoy less power as he had to form a coalition government with the Liberal Democrats, in order to achieve a majority. This would mean that the likes of the Prime Minister would in many situations have to be compromised.…

    • 664 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the federal election of October 1925, King-Byng affair occurred between Governor General Julian Byng and Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King, when Liberals won 101 seats and Conservatives won 116 in the election. Therefore, King decided to call a re-election before he lost support of Progressives. However, when he asked Lord Byng to dissolve the Parliament, Byng refused; believing King should have resigned before (canadianautonomy.webnode.com, 2014). Subsequently, King and his government resigned leaving Canada without a Prime minister. “The Governor General proceeded as quickly as possible to ask Arthur Meighan, the leader of the Conservative party, and the party with majority of seats in the parliament, but the Meighans government lasted only three day before the non-confidence votes defeated it” (www.thewhig.com, 2014). After observing the situation and taking the advice of Meighan, Byng decided to dissolve parliament and call election, in which King had won. This event was significantly important to independence of Canada because it was one of the events which led to Canada’s autonomy. William Lyon Mackenzie King had stood up to British officials, stating that Byng didn’t act in Canada’s best interest, and a Canadian not a British official should represent Canada (http://prezi.com/, 2012). This was the last time in Canadian history that a Governor General disregarded the advice of a Prime Ministers. (ww.cbc.ca, 2014). This event led to the Balfour Declaration, which was also a step towards the independence of Canada.…

    • 314 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sir John a MacDonald was the first prime minister of Canada and was the dominant representative of the Canadian confederation. He was born on the 11th January 1815 and passed on 6th June. His term in office was 18 years long which places him to the second longest serving prime minister in Canada. He is the only one to ever win six majority governments (Hennessy 12). As for Sir Wilfrid Laurier, he was the seventh prime minister, Born on 20th November 1841 and passed on on the 17th February 1919. He was the first francophone prime minister and was considered one of the countries superb statesmen. As compared to his counter part John a MacDonald, sir Wilfrid was also in the list of the longest serving prime ministers in Canada although him coming in as position four. Sir Wilfrid also contributed to the expanding of the confederation. Sir John MacDonald was born in Glasgow Scotland was the third in a family of five while Sir Wilfrid laurier was born in Saint-lin Canada East and was the 7th generation of his family. MacDonald’s parents decided that he should become a lawyer after his completion of schooling. It was a great choice for a boy who seemed to really admire studying and beside that he had an urgent to start earning cash in order to support his family since his fathers business ventures were failing. As compared to Macdonald Lauriers’ father was well up and by the age of eleven he was sent to study in new Glasgow. Macdonald had a rather sorrowful and tragedous private life.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, their relationship is influenced by the whips, who attempt to place the loyal MPs on key committees and have to remove…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prime Minister is the most important person in British politics. The Prime Minister appoints his cabinet and makes the final decisions on major issues. The Prime Minister cannot become a President as the UK system would not allow it but in the recent years, people have criticised that our Prime Ministers have increasingly become more of a presidential figure in Parliament. Some of the ministers that have been referred to as presidential include Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair etc. Now in this essay, I will be analysing the factors that shows the growth of power of PM.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two perspectives on Presidential power are power as persuasion and unilateral power. Since Presidents’ power is to persuade, they have far less formal power than the necessary to meet the large expectations over them. Presidents take to office their goals and expectations for public policy, but to accomplish these, they must work with the Congress. Congress and the presidency were created to avoid one single institution from having control over policymaking. Presidents’ power involves the bargaining that derives from their position, reputation, prestige and reputation (Howell). They make their personal impact on the choices of what should be said or done, how and when.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canadian Prime Minister

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Several factors make the Canadian Parliament less suited to provide institutional checks to the Office of the Prime Minister. First, the staffs in the Office of the Prime Minister are accountable to the office holder and not to Parliament. Therefore, parliament has no control over them and cannot hold them responsible for their actions. Political party leaders in Canada are elected through a rigorous process akin to the one used in the USA. The high rate of turnover after each election means fewer MPs consolidate power enough…

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The President of the United States of America has many powers. However, through congress and the Supreme Court the powers of the President are checked. This is to make the US a more fair and democratic country and to ensure one person does not hold all the power. This essay will access the effectiveness of Congress and the Supreme Court in checking the powers of the president.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    conscription crisis

    • 392 Words
    • 1 Page

    Determining how popular and successful a Canadian Prime Minister is helps us understand our stance as Canadians on politics and the type of leadership we believe in. Prime Minister R.B. Bennett does deserve his bad reputation as he had a conceited attitude, and he did not know how to solve the depression. Firstly, he was perceived as conceited as he was a smart man who thought he knew what to do at all times and did not need advice or other people's opinions (“Canadian Politics in the 1930's and 1930's”, April 14th, 2014). This is made clear when he allowed the relief camps to continue to exist even after learning that they had serious problems and were not being helpful in any way because he thought that he could make a few changes to his original plan and make things work (“Canadian Prime Ministers in the 1920s and 1930s”, April 10th, 2014). Secondly, he did not understand the depression from the perspective of his people as he was detached from them, and therefore, was unable to solve it. This is evident when he raised tariffs on international goods to protect Canadian businesses thinking that it would create more jobs for the works but ended up causing major issues for industries that depended on exports, resulting in a standstill in foreign trade and worsening the effects of the depression (p. 164). Additionally, he never visited the relief camps in person so he was not aware of the poor conditions that existed within them which ultimately caused the Regina Riot (“Canadian Politics in the 1930's and 1930's”, April 14th, 2014). Some may say that he had a good plan, “The New Deal”, to solve the depression but he was voted out of power and just did not get a chance to implement it. However, he only proposed this new idea out of selfishness to gain some public support and votes as the elections were nearing, not to better serve the public interest (p. 165). In conclusion, Prime Minister Bennett…

    • 392 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In theory, the Parliament is the most important institution in the Canadian government and all members of the parliament are equal. The Prime Minister is supposed to be primus inter pares, meaning first among equals. But over the years, the cabinet has become more institutionalized and less departmentalized. Hence the Prime Minister’s power has increased over the years. Canada is the one of the most decentralized federations in the World. Power is swung away from the parliament and is more concentrated in the executive branch (Courtney, 1984: p. 241). The Prime Ministers is not too powerful in a global scale but it has substantial power within Canada. However the power of the Prime Minister can also be affected by many different factors. .…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * The leader of the party with majority in the Assembly would become the Prime Minister and select a cabinet…

    • 3466 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays