Preview

An Outline of Thomas Hobbes' Social Contract

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1405 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Outline of Thomas Hobbes' Social Contract
Outline Hobbes' theory on the social contract giving details on what he believed was needed to maintain it.

I will attempt to answer this question by initially explaining what Hobbes' view on humanity was, since these views were what caused him to write his theory on the social contract, quote part of what he wrote regarding the subject and what it means in layman's terms

What Hobbes believed:

Thomas Hobbes, a 17th century British philosopher, had a rather pessimistic (but, in my opinion, not untrue) view on humanity. In a nutshell, he believed that humanity was born evil and needed society and law to keep it in order. Hobbes wrote that "during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called war; and such a war as is of every man against every man". In this state any person has a natural right to do anything to preserve his own liberty or safety, and life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." He believed that in the international arena, states behave as individuals do in a state of nature.

Within the state of nature, according to Hobbes, there is no injustice, since there is no law, excepting certain natural precepts, the first of which is "that every man ought to endeavour peace, as far as he has hope of obtaining it"; and the second is "that a man be willing, when others are so too, as far forth as for peace and defence of himself he shall think it necessary, to lay down this right to all things; and be contented with so much liberty against other men as he would allow other men against himself". From this, Hobbes develops the way out of the state of nature into civil government by mutual contract.

Hobbes coins a Latin phrase, Bellum omnium contra omnes, meaning "the war of all against all", and this is the description that he gives to human existence in the state of nature thought experiment that he conducts in De Cive (1642) and Leviathan (1651). To prove that this state of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The argument presented by Thomas Hobbes in chapter 13 of Leviathan, is that the state of nature is a state of war of all against all. Such a view had previously been discussed- earlier versions of the argument appear in other significant works- however it is Hobbes account of a state in “continuall feare of danger and violent death”1 upon which I will focus on and critique in this essay. There are many reasons why many seem to regard Hobbes argument as the most accurate portrayal of a pre-civilised society, many believe it to be so straightforward and seemingly correct that to object it would be to ignore a necessary truth. Secondly, those who accept Hobbes’ view of a human nature that is so egotistical and unforgiving, would seemingly too agree to the assumption of a gloomy, unbearable state of nature. In this essay I shall argue that such opinions are not logically justified as Hobbes’s argument holds its foundations solidly in assumption alone, an assumption that was heavily moulded on his surroundings of a savage Civil War. Hobbes’s argument lies solely on the grounds that human beings are intrinsically wicked and self-centred beings an argument that cannot be completely validated and therefore cannot be a ‘necessary truth’. Yet despite holding such a bleak outlook on the human condition and its simple invalidity the work of Thomas Hobbes still shapes the political word today2 and it continues to impact our understanding of human nature and interactions. In order to justify my critique of Hobbes I will begin by presenting both his original argument and a brief view of some modern interpretations before cross examining their conclusions against that of other social contract theorist such as Locke and Rousseau as well as rational logic to present the argument that the state of nature is most certainly not a state of war of all against all.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After analyzing how Locke and Hobbes understand the state of nature it is evident that they share many ideas but they also show essential differences in their ideas. Hobbes regards the state of nature as a state of war, in which natural law is established only after a process of reasoning. This process leads men to the conclusion that they must somehow find…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes believed in a social contract, an implicit understanding between government and governed. His ideal government would be an absolute monarchy that holds power like a leviathan, a sea monster. John Locke, also an English philosopher, believed that people…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Leviathan, Hobbes attempts to explain how civil government came to be established. He begins his argument at the most logical place; the fundamental basis of mankind, and makes several key steps in the development of human nature to reach the implementation of a sovereign ruler. Hobbes believes the foundation of mankind is motion. Man is in constant motion and the instability that forms from the collisions that ensue from the constant motion form the state of nature. The state of nature is an inherently dangerous lifestyle, where all members live in a state of constant fear. This fear drives man to consent to a social contract, which establishes a peaceful existence. The social contract is ultimately enforced by the sovereign ruler who uses fear of punishment to ensure man follows the laws created. Man essentially gives up one type of fear for another in an attempt to better human life.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 103 Final

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1D. The state of nature is Hobbes’ description of what human beings lived like prior to the existence of a state or civilized society. In this existence, all humans were equal in that they all wanted to achieve their ultimate end and they all had the right to do what they thought necessary for survival…

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    not necessary for a covenant that would restrict the opinions of people, since people only reason in terms of morals, and moral tend to be the values of the individuals of society. Hobbes believes that the only way to ensure order in society is for the covenant to be established, and only through the covenant can there be order. The covenant for Hobbes is justice and order, since it was a transfer of rights that ended the constant war between individuals, by having them transfer some of their rights in return for security of one’s life. The transfer of rights included things like having a power dictate the laws, and the individual has no say in this, and cannot question it in any fashion.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is a brutish and violent nature. In the absence of culture, arts, science, reading or writing, humans, possibly, are more related to animals, since animals also live in the state of nature, and who always fight for domination. This rather negative view is Hobbe’s main reason why there should be a government. There should be an authority to establish peace. In peace, numerous achievements can be obtained. In peace does humanity progress. It might be argued that Hobbes demands a despot, an autocracy. Still, is not that better than the state of nature? There might be many opposing arguments especially that of the anarchists, yet Hobbe’s examples might not be conquered because they are succinct and feasible. They are plausibly impregnable because they are factual, not idealist. Leviathan does convincingly argue, and this monster in the state of nature does devour…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes believed that humans were naturally selfish, in which he believed that lead people to greed and the ugly human nature of jealousy.“The condition of man . . . is a condition of war of everyone against everyone”.(Thomas Hobbes , https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/10122.Thomas_Hobbes) Also in following the greed, he believed that if there were to be no government, there were aslo to be no peace within the people, athough there were no peace with the neighboring countries.“Whatsoever therefore is consequent to a time of war, where every man is enemy to every man, the same consequent to the time wherein men live without other security than what their own strength and their own invention shall furnish them withal. In such condition there is no place for industry... no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”(Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan) The social contract was the agreement by in which the people define and limit their individual right;creating an organized society. The social contract was based on an absolute monarchy in which the people would later disagree to and make their revolution. The claim made by Thomas Hobbes, had a major influence on the American Democracy and the French Revolution because of the fears that the people had during this time of…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas & Locke

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The one great similarity between Thomas Hobbes’ state of nature and John Locke’s state of nature is that they both discuss how dangerous a state of nature can actually be. Both suggest that men are equals in this state with Hobbes stating “Nature hath made men so equal, in the faculties of body and mind, as that though there be found one man sometimes manifestly stronger in body, or of quicker mind than another; yet when all is reckoned together, the difference between man and man is not so considerable.” Likewise, Locke describes this nature as a “state of perfect equality, where naturally there is no superiority or jurisdiction of one over another.” Despite thinking alike in this way, however, Locke and Hobbes warn of the risk of the state of nature. Hobbes so states, “if any two men cannot enjoy the same thing, they become enemies and in the way to their end…endeavor to destroy or subdue one another.” Similarly, Locke points out these risks, saying that without the “law of nature,” man may make decisions that lead to a state of war.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke Synthesis

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The natural state of humanity promotes personal freedom and rights with the demand of peace. They are born inherently good and in a “state of perfect freedom.”1 The law of nature is the primitive law of life that creates personal rights. The law of nature protects people’s freedoms and keeps them under a code. While individuals are born inherently good, moderate greed is included in the law of nature as a way for “[man] to preserve himself” and to “preserve the rest of mankind.”2 The individual is put before all of mankind because mankind cannot survive without the individual. While the individual is the most important there are restrictions to protect each man’s freedom. The law of nature Hobbes creates a state of nature where each man fights and survives for himself. In Hobbes’s state of nature there is no way for each man to thrive. Locke believes that not all men are evil and sets the law of nature to be livable for all individuals. Locke does not follow Hobbes’s brutal state of nature by not allowing men to violate the rights of other individuals.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Bossuet

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Consequently, Hobbes then introduces common wealth and power, which he argues, is both logical and necessary to save man from their destructive qualities. This can be achieved through the means of a covenant, which allows men to willingly submit to one man who will advocate unity and be the voice of the commonwealth to bring peace. To reach peace and unity Hobbes states that men must, “confer all their power and strength upon one Man […] reduce all their Wills, by plurality of voices, unto one Will” (7). Hobbes theory continues to state that common wealth can only be created through force or voluntary…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historical backdrop Social contract theory raises the chances that necessitate for social order and certain inbuilt constraints might offer us with a natural basis for ethics. It is one of the propositions of political science that the society and state is based on contract. While it might seem that there is well-built impulse for social anarchy without an outside purpose source of morality, according to some philosophers like Thomas Hobbes, the incentive is built into the social system by the very nature of our existing among each other. Question arises what if there is no contract in life? In order to fulfil some factors that cannot be exist without this contract in society as described by Hobbes are: equality in needs, Scarcity, Equality of human power, Limited altruism.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with Hobbes point of view because I believe human nature is naturally “evil”, he states “Civil society is the application of force by the state to uphold contracts and so forth.” He’s saying, without the social contract that people are morally obligated to withhold, we would follow our human nature to simply do as we please.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leviathan Human Nature

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Thomas Hobbes’ most iconic work, Leviathan, in chapter thirteen to sixteen he begins his argument for how human beings should live in society. According to Hobbes, human nature is inherently violent and filled with fear. Hobbes argues that human beings are never satisfied with any amount of power which causes a constant power struggle between human beings. For as long as modern human beings have been around, our species has almost always been at war or some kind of struggle with ne another. Human beings often strive for the same end result, whether it be food or shelter, which puts human beings in a constant struggle and in completion with each other. Throughout Leviathan, Hobbes view of human nature is pretty pessimistic and I have to agree…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays