An Evaluation of the Circle of Friends Intervention Utilisied with Year 5 Pupils in the Uk
AN EVALUATION OF ‘CIRCLE OF FRIENDS’ INTERVENTION UTILISED WITH YEAR 5 PUPILS
A dissertation submitted in part fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
MSc in Educational Psychology in the Faculty of Humanities.
2006
Philip Stock
The University of Manchester
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Circle of Friends intervention on year five (9-10 years old) pupils. The Circle of Friends approach is a recent development that aims to promote children 's social inclusion and acceptance that centrally involves the classroom peer group. Pupils from the target population volunteer to be part of the Circle of Friends, a group of eight is then selected and meet once a week (for five weeks) to discuss difficulties, problem solve and take part in a range of activities. Three experimental groups and one control group were selected from four schools in the central Manchester area. Four girls and four boys were selected from each year 5 class to form a Circle of Friends group (plus one control group). Goodman’s (2001) Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was utilised to collect pre and post intervention data for both the control and experimental groups (both teacher & pupil completed) to evaluate the effectiveness of the approach. A sociogram was also administered to help assess the effectiveness of the intervention. It was hypothesised that for the pupils participating in the Circle of Friends (experimental groups) their mean difference between pre and post ‘total difficulties’ score (SDQ) would significantly decrease and their ‘prosocial’ score (SDQ) would significantly increase when compared to the control group. This differed from the majority of research in the area as each group had two focus children (usually the intervention was based on one focus child) and the research aimed to assess the effectiveness of the approach for all pupils involved and not just the focus children. The results from the
A dissertation submitted in part fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
MSc in Educational Psychology in the Faculty of Humanities.
2006
Philip Stock
The University of Manchester
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Circle of Friends intervention on year five (9-10 years old) pupils. The Circle of Friends approach is a recent development that aims to promote children 's social inclusion and acceptance that centrally involves the classroom peer group. Pupils from the target population volunteer to be part of the Circle of Friends, a group of eight is then selected and meet once a week (for five weeks) to discuss difficulties, problem solve and take part in a range of activities. Three experimental groups and one control group were selected from four schools in the central Manchester area. Four girls and four boys were selected from each year 5 class to form a Circle of Friends group (plus one control group). Goodman’s (2001) Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was utilised to collect pre and post intervention data for both the control and experimental groups (both teacher & pupil completed) to evaluate the effectiveness of the approach. A sociogram was also administered to help assess the effectiveness of the intervention. It was hypothesised that for the pupils participating in the Circle of Friends (experimental groups) their mean difference between pre and post ‘total difficulties’ score (SDQ) would significantly decrease and their ‘prosocial’ score (SDQ) would significantly increase when compared to the control group. This differed from the majority of research in the area as each group had two focus children (usually the intervention was based on one focus child) and the research aimed to assess the effectiveness of the approach for all pupils involved and not just the focus children. The results from the
References: Asher, S.R. and Coie, J.D. (1990) Peer Rejection in Childhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bagwell, C.L., Newcomb, A.F. and Bukowski, W.M. (1998) Preadolescent friendship and peer rejection as predictors of adult adjustment. Child Development, 69 (1), 140-153. Barrett, W., & Randall, L. (2004) Investigating the Circle of Friends Approach: Adaptations and Implications for Practice. Educational Psychology in Practice. Vol 20(4) Dec 2004, 353-368 Baxter, J., & Frederickson, N Buckinghamshire County Council. (2002) Educational Psychology Service. Circle of Friends: A Resource Booklet. Cassidy, J. and Asher, S. (1992) Loneliness and peer relations in young children. Child Development, 63, 350-365. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2000) Research Methods in Education (5th edition). London: Routledge/ Falmer. Cowie, H., Smith, P., Boulton, M. and Laver, R. (1994) Co-operation in the Multi-ethnic Classroom. London: David Fulton Publishers. Dacey, J.S. and Travers, J.F. (1996) Human Development Across the Lifespan. London: Brown and Benchmark. Dodge, K.A. and Feldman, E. (1990) Issues in social cognition and sociometric status. Forest, M., & Lusthaus, E. (1989) Promoting educational equality for all students: Circles and maps. In S. Stainback, W. Stainback, & M. Forest (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education (pp. 43-57). Baltimore: Brookes. Frederickson, N. (1991) Children can be so cruel - Helping the rejected child. In G. Lindsay & A. Miller (Eds.), Psychological services for primary schools. Harlow, Essex: Longman. Frederickson, N. & Turner, J. (2002) Utilizing the classroom peer group to address children 's social needs: An evaluation of the Circle of Friends intervention approach. Journal of Special Education. Vol 36(4) Win 2002, 234-245. Fredrickson, N. (2002) Evidence-based practice and educational psychology. Educational and Child Psychology, Vol.19, No.3, 96-111. Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586. Goodman, R., Melttzer, H. & Bailey, V. (1998) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 7, pp. 125-130. Goodman R (2001) Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337-1345. Goodman, R., Melttzer, H. & Bailey, V. (2003) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. International Review of Psychiatry, 15, 173–177 Hartup, W Hobbs, C., Taylor, J., and Todd, L. (2000) Consulting with children and young people: Enabling educational psychologists to work collaboratively. Educational and Child Psychology. 17(4), 107-115. Hudson, P. and Miller, C. (1997) The treasure hunt: strategies for obtaining maximum response to a postal survey. Evaluation and Research in Education, 11 (2), 102-12. Hymel, S., Wagner, E. and Butler, L.J. (1990) Reputational bias: View from the peer group. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Morison, P. and Masten, A. (1991).Peer reputation in middle childhood as a predictor of adaptation in adolescence: A seven year follow up. Child Development, 62, 991-1007. Muris P, Meesters C, van den Berg F (2003) ‘The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents.’ European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 12, 1-8. Newton, C., Taylor, G., & Wilson, D. (1996) Circles of Friends: An inclusive approach to meeting emotional and behavioural needs. Educational Psychology in Practice, 11, 41-48. Newton, C. and Wilson, D. (2005) Creating Circles of Friends: A Peer Support and Inclusion Workbook. UK: Inclusive Solutions Parker, J Pearpoint, J., Forest, M. and Snow, J. (1993) “The Inclusion Papers – Strategies to Make Inclusion Work”. Inclusion Press, Toronto. Perske, R. (1988) Circles of Friends. Nashville, Tenessee: Abington Press. Robson, C. (1993) Real World Research. Oxford: Blackwell. Roller, J. (1998) Facilitating Pupil Involvement in Assessment, Planning and Review Processes. Educational Psychology in Practice. Vol.13, No.4, 266-273. Rubin, K.H. and Mills, R.S.L. (1988) The many faces of social isolation in childhood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56 (6), p.916-924. Schroeder, A. (1996) Socially Speaking. London: LDA Shotton, G Snow, J., & Forest, M. (1987) Circles. In M. Forest (Ed.), More education integration (pp. 169-176). Downsview, Ontario, Canada: G. Allan Roeher Institute. Stainbeck, S., and Stanbeck, W. (1992) ‘Introduction’ in J.Pearpoint, M.Forest & J.Snow. The Inclusion Papers. Toronto: Inclusion Press. Wagner, P. (2000) Consultation: Developing a comprehensive approach to service delivery. Educational Psychology in Practice. 16(1), 9-18.