An assesment of the ethical dimensions
EJBO Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies
Vol. 11, No. 1 (2006)
An assessment of the ethical dimensions of corruption
By: Geetanee Napal
VNAPAL@UOM.AC.MU
Abstract
This paper addresses the ethical dimensions of corruption. Corruption in the form of bribery is widespread in the developing world and this includes Mauritius. Corruption assessed in absolute terms is unethical. However, if one were to use relativistic views, one would make allowances for ‘mild’ forms of corruption like seeking favours to obtain unwarranted advantages or paying bribes in the form of ‘speedup gratuities’. Our study shows that in many contexts, acts of corruption are accepted and justified either on the basis of the gains they bring to the individual who offered the bribe or undertake to seek the particular favour. It depends on the values prevailing in particular societies, hence notions of relativism. Another determinant of unethical conduct is the risk involved. As some of the literature emphasises, often the decision-maker may choose not to embark onto unethical conduct not because it is wrong in absolute terms, but because s/he is afraid of getting caught. This paper presents the assessment of specific acts of corruption, as made by our participants who were all from the business sector. Respondents rated scenarios representing instances of bribery, using the multi-dimensional ethics scale developed by Reidenbach and Robin (1988) as measurement device.
Keywords
Ethics, corruption, bribery
5
Introduction
Literature
Corruption is common to the Mauritian culture (National Integrity Systems,
Transparency International Country
Study Report, Mauritius, 2004, Unpublished). Different segments of the population get involved in corruption, the focus being on various trivial immediate benefits. At times of elections, efforts and resources are directed to the distribution of gifts, to ensure the vote of the
Vol. 11, No. 1 (2006)
An assessment of the ethical dimensions of corruption
By: Geetanee Napal
VNAPAL@UOM.AC.MU
Abstract
This paper addresses the ethical dimensions of corruption. Corruption in the form of bribery is widespread in the developing world and this includes Mauritius. Corruption assessed in absolute terms is unethical. However, if one were to use relativistic views, one would make allowances for ‘mild’ forms of corruption like seeking favours to obtain unwarranted advantages or paying bribes in the form of ‘speedup gratuities’. Our study shows that in many contexts, acts of corruption are accepted and justified either on the basis of the gains they bring to the individual who offered the bribe or undertake to seek the particular favour. It depends on the values prevailing in particular societies, hence notions of relativism. Another determinant of unethical conduct is the risk involved. As some of the literature emphasises, often the decision-maker may choose not to embark onto unethical conduct not because it is wrong in absolute terms, but because s/he is afraid of getting caught. This paper presents the assessment of specific acts of corruption, as made by our participants who were all from the business sector. Respondents rated scenarios representing instances of bribery, using the multi-dimensional ethics scale developed by Reidenbach and Robin (1988) as measurement device.
Keywords
Ethics, corruption, bribery
5
Introduction
Literature
Corruption is common to the Mauritian culture (National Integrity Systems,
Transparency International Country
Study Report, Mauritius, 2004, Unpublished). Different segments of the population get involved in corruption, the focus being on various trivial immediate benefits. At times of elections, efforts and resources are directed to the distribution of gifts, to ensure the vote of the
References: Adams, D. M. and Maine, E. W. 1998. Business Ethics for the 21st Century, Mayfield Publishing Company. Alatas, S. H. 1999. Corruption and the Destiny of Asia, Simon and Schuster. Argandona, A. 2002.‘Political Party Funding and Business Corruption’, Research Paper No Argandona, A. 2003.‘Private-to-Private Corruption’, Journal of Business Ethics, 47, 3: 253-267. Bradburn, R. 2001. Understanding Business Ethics, Continuum, London. Attorney General, 1998. Colombatto, E. 2003.‘Why is Corruption Tolerated?’, The Review of Austrian Economics, 16,4: 363-379. Crawford, G. 2000.‘Promoting Democratic Governance in the South’, The European Journal of Development Research, 12,1: 23-57. Damania, R., Fredriksson, P. G., and Muthukumara, M. 2004.‘The Persistence of Corruption and Regulatory Compliance Failures: Chakraborty, S. K. 1997.‘Business Ethics in India’, Journal of Business Ethics, 16,14: 1529-1538. Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J. and Ferrell, L. 2002.‘Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases’, Houghton Mifflin Company. Garcia J. 1990.‘The Primacy of the Virtuous’, Philosophia, 20: 69–91. Hancock G. 1989. Lords of Poverty, Macmillan, London. Vol. 11, No. 1 (2006) authorities to get a building permit Kujala, J. 2001.‘A Multi-Dimensional Approach to Finnish Managers’ Moral Decision-Making’, Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 3/4: 231254. Napal, G. 2001. Disclosing Corruption: a move towards transparency in Mauritius, Editions Le Printemps. Napal, G. 2005.‘Is Bribery a Culturally Acceptable Practice in Mauritius?’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 14, 3, 231-249. National Integrity Systems, Transparency International Country Study Report, Mauritius, 2004, Unpublished. Reidenbach, R. E. and Robin, D. P., 1988.‘Some Initial Steps Toward Improving the Measurement of Ethical Evaluations of Marketing Reidenbach, R. E., Robin, D. P., and Dawson, L. 1991.‘An Application and Extension of a Multidimensional Ethics Scale to Selected Report of the Select Committee on Fraud and Corruption, 2001. Robinson, M. 1998 ‘Corruption and Development’, The European Journal of Development Research, 10,1, 1-14. Rose-Ackerman, 1999. S. Corruption and Government - Cambridge University Press, New York. Rossouw G. J. 1998.‘Establishing Moral Business Culture in Newly Formed Democracies’, Journal of Business Ethics, 17,14: 1563-1571. Segal P. 1999.‘Dealing with the Devil, The Hell of Corruption’, International Finance Corporation Publications, World Bank Tanzi, V. 1998.‘Corruption Around the World, Causes, Consequences, Scope, and Cures’, IMF Staff Papers, 45,4: 559-594. National Integrity Study for Mauritius”, 2004.