American Popular Culture and Its Impact in a Globalized World
Americans, after all, did not invent fast food, amusement parks, or the movies. Before the Big Mac, there were British fish and chips. Before Disneyland, there was Copenhagen's Tivoli Gardens (which Walt Disney used as a prototype for his first theme park, in Anaheim, a model later re-exported to Tokyo and Paris). Richard Pells
1. Introduction
No matter what corner of the world, it is more than unlikely to walk up to an adoles-cent, mention the names Jennifer Lopez, Madonna, Eminem or Bruce Willis and be confronted with a questioning face of ignorance. Performers and actors such as these have become increasingly omnipresent in people's lives all around the globe. American popular culture with its above-mentioned icons and its lifestyle of fast food and consumer goods tends to be received by foreign societies in a variety of differing ways. Terms such as Americanization, Westernization and even globalization are only a few of many that have been employed to label the phenomenon of America's growing cultural dominance in the world. Decades of public discourse about this is-sue have shown that all these expressions are being used interchangeably by many. We will see below, however, that it is helpful and, in my view, even necessary to make correct use of the terminology in order to come to a thorough understanding and, finally, a critical evaluation of the problem to be discussed. Various nations have been complaining about a McDonaldization (yet another word for U.S. cultural power worldwide) of their domestic cultures. The present discussion tries to investigate whether American popular culture truly poses a threat to national and regional cul-tural traditions, values and tastes or whether America's popular commodities in fact bear the potential of cultural diversity in receiving cultures. In an attempt to come to a conclusion regarding this question we take a look at the American music business as well as American film and television shows
1. Introduction
No matter what corner of the world, it is more than unlikely to walk up to an adoles-cent, mention the names Jennifer Lopez, Madonna, Eminem or Bruce Willis and be confronted with a questioning face of ignorance. Performers and actors such as these have become increasingly omnipresent in people's lives all around the globe. American popular culture with its above-mentioned icons and its lifestyle of fast food and consumer goods tends to be received by foreign societies in a variety of differing ways. Terms such as Americanization, Westernization and even globalization are only a few of many that have been employed to label the phenomenon of America's growing cultural dominance in the world. Decades of public discourse about this is-sue have shown that all these expressions are being used interchangeably by many. We will see below, however, that it is helpful and, in my view, even necessary to make correct use of the terminology in order to come to a thorough understanding and, finally, a critical evaluation of the problem to be discussed. Various nations have been complaining about a McDonaldization (yet another word for U.S. cultural power worldwide) of their domestic cultures. The present discussion tries to investigate whether American popular culture truly poses a threat to national and regional cul-tural traditions, values and tastes or whether America's popular commodities in fact bear the potential of cultural diversity in receiving cultures. In an attempt to come to a conclusion regarding this question we take a look at the American music business as well as American film and television shows
Bibliography: Available:http://www.aworldconnected.org/article.php?id=486&print=1 (15 April 2003) Barber, Benjamin R Cantor, Paul A. 2001. Gilligan Unbound: Pop Culture in the Age of Globalization. Cowen, Tyler. 2002. Creative Destruction: How Globalization is Changing the World 's Cultures Danan, Martine. 1995. "Marketing the Hollywood Blockbuster in France" Journal of Popular Film & Television 23: 131-140. Available: http://www.ghi-dc.org/conpotweb/westernpapers/doering.pdf (9 May 2003) Eirich, Brad Available: http://www.angelfire.com/il3/globalculture/ (2 June 2003) Fluck, Winfrid nating the globe. Available: http://www.reason.com/0303/cr.cf.we.shtml (15 April 2003) Friedman, Thomas L. 2000. The Lexus and the Olive Tree. New York: Anchor Books. Available: http://www.theglobalist.com/DBWeb/printStoryId.aspx?StoryId=2268 (12 May 2003) Juluri, Vamsee K. unknown date. Why MTV Digs India? Available: http://www.indiastar.com/juluri.htm (2 June 2003) Available: http://www.wowessays.com/dbase/ab4/ios47.shtml (15 April 2003) Library of Congress Available: http://www.loc.gov/acq/devpol/colloverviews/amerpopcul.html (23 May 2003) Liebes, Tamar and Elihu Katz. 1993. The export of meaning: cross-cultural readings of Dallas Available: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A45677-2003Apr27?la- guage=printer (30 April 2003) Available: http://www.alternet.org/print.html?StoryID=14900 (6 May 2003) MTV Europe (12 May 2003) Pells, Richard Philio, Simon. unknown date. Getting Dumber and Dumber: MTV 's Global Footprint. Available: http://members.tripod.com/~warlight/PHILO.html (6 May 2003) Available: http://www.isop.ucla.edu/print.asp?parentid=2059 (3 June 2003) Qian, Jian Available: http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/u/juq101/globalization.htm (15 April 2003) Available: http://reason.com/0202/cr.ng.gilligan.shtml (12 February 2003) Rockwell, John