Preview

American Individualism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1881 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
American Individualism
Why do people struggle when it comes to our political system? Why is it so confusing to some and basically second nature to others? Why do some people feel strongly towards the government while others prefer a more individualistic approach? The dilemma of how we think about our political system is not a new problem. Individuals have been debating on what system is the right one, which beliefs should be the dominant ones and so on for generations. I presume this problem lies in our individualistic tendencies and the want for the colonists to have a government that is completely different from Great Britain. We place so much weight on individualism and doing things by ourselves, without the governments help, that we don’t realize how complex …show more content…
The way individualists thought and acted in the time of the Puritans would be completely different than, say, the libertarians would today. Back in ancient times, Indian tribes believed that the status of the individual was due to what had occurred in their past life. And with this status and current life, they believed the individual had a path laid out, but it was up to them whether or not they wanted to follow it. Socrates also displayed a type of individualism that he spoke constantly by saying “Know Yourself.” By this, he meant that nobody was able to tell an individual what he or she could or could not do, it was up to the individual to find out for themselves. And finally, a name we all know, Augustine of Hippo gives us yet another example of individualism. He exclaims that, in a matter of free will, man has a right to choose what they want and the direction they want to go. They are not totally dependent on God’s grace alone. Today, I would argue our thoughts of individualism are not anything like those. Today we are more focused on the individuals right to have a gun or the individuals right to get an abortion. I would argue that today’s world is more material and not as deep of a topic. The change, however, is interesting to look …show more content…
To characters like Hutchinson and Williams, this possibility for strong authority also came with a possibility of corruption or abuse of power. Not only did they believe in individualism when it came to government, but Hutchinson expressed her opinion on an individual response to religion. She displayed that one did not have to rely on the church to obtain grace, it was more about achieving a personal communion with God. Her counterpart who criticized the centralized government, Williams, displayed his belief of a separation of church and state in order to let the superior conscience of the individual take effect. I think both of these Puritans show us, early on in American history, the first real signs of individualistic tendencies in our young country. They both express extreme beliefs in the power of the individual and the ability to get the job done without the need of help. Especially for Hutchinson, she almost claims that the church is useless, in a sense, because one can be in a relationship with God without it. I think this part is fairly relatable in today’s world due to the bad reputation Christianity and the church is receiving. Many Christians are deciding against joining a church because of some of the things it involves itself in. They decide that they are most definitely followers of Christ but not members of a church. I

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Winthrop was a Puritan who believed in covenant theology, which means he believed that church and state should work together to govern. He was a leader of the MBC and governor of the colony for 12 terms. He was mainly an authoritarian leader who let his religious beliefs influence much of his governing duties. Roger Williams, on the other hand, believed the polar opposite of Winthrop. He Said, “God requireth not a uniformity of religion to be enacted and enforced in any civil state…” (Doc. F). Williams had believed in separation of church and state and was an important dissenter who found the MBC to be oppressive. He left eventually to create his own settlement of Providence where he allowed more religious freedom and separation of church and state. Both of these men show how Puritan beliefs affected politics in the New England Colonies at the time, and how religion was related to those…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The puritan’s view of the way things should be done in this century was that men and women had certain roles and for women to step outside of these boundaries, that is to act in a way that it is perceived that only men should act, is highly contestable. The puritans adhered to the bible very closely. Also, the puritan society of early Massachusetts was among the most critical that could be imagined. John Winthrop who was the prosecutor in the case against Anne Hutchinson was among the strictest puritan, along with the local government. One can clearly identify the puritan’s feelings of their superiority, not only in law, government, and church, but also in being a man as opposed…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socially, Puritan ideas on community and doing God’s bidding made a lasting impact on New England. Many of New England’s political views were greatly influenced by Puritan beliefs in what they deemed unlawful and sinful. As mentioned in Document C, “We bind ourselves to study the advancement of the gospel in all truth and peace; both in regard of those that are within or without [church membership]…” In this excerpt from The Salem Covenant, the authors discuss the idea that the Bible is law, stating all people, regardless whether or not they belong to the church or not should abide by the words of God. The laws of many communities were built off of what was sinful to the Puritans, thus making many of these things illegal. It was also believed that the religious believers should have power. In Document H, John Cotton speaks about the limitations of the government, “It is therefore fit for every man to be studious of the bounds the Lord hath set: and for the people, in whom fundamentally power lies, to give as much power as God in His word gives men…” He essentially is saying that the men with whom power is given…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    | Laws forbid the pricing of an item t more than 5% over its actual costs…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Puritans were passionate reformers seeking to bring the Church of England to a state of purity in comparison with Christianity at the time of Christ and decided to form their own religious colonies in America. They considered religion to be a complex and highly intellectual affair. Thus, leaders were highly trained scholars with authoritarian positions that developed a “built-in hierarchism” (http://xroads.virginia.edu/%7eCAP/PURITAN/purhist.html#pil, 3). Roger Williams and Anne Hutchinson believed and preached “Individualisme”…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Winthrop, the man who set this goal for the Puritans, used God as a way to form a close-knit society. Winthrop felt that closeness in a community was very important in order to work closely together. (Doc A) Since God was so influential in this situation, then it must have been important for Him to be a bigger part of their society: their government. This led to the development of a theocracy. The “closeness” that Winthrop spoke of was very true in the theocratic government, because ministers were protected, and the church members worked closely with each other. Together, they placed harsh requirements upon the people of Puritan New England. They had to attend church services, pay taxes to support the church, and were therefore bound to the church not just through religion, but also through the government. Their loyalty was also expected by the church. The people could in no form offend the church, they promised to study the gospels, spread their knowledge of Him to their children, and most importantly, acknowledged His power: “…and all this not by any strength of our own, but by the Lord Christ” (Doc C). Because it was assumed that any material success by the people…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every time in history when the government had too much power, corruption occurred. In Massachusetts Bay colony and other colonies, church and politics were greatly combined, causing problems with non-Puritans. The church influenced the conduct of politics and the affairs of society. These non-puritans were persecuted and were excluded from certain rights that the church attenders had, for example one had to be a church member to vote in colony elections. The rulings of the church were everywhere, including in laws, which were drawn from scriptures. At times like these when the church became too powerful and began to greatly intervene with peoples lives, there are always a few people who would bring this injustice to the surface. In the Massachusetts Bay colony during the 1630’s, a man by the name of Roger Williams was spreading word that the king of England had no right to take away Indian land for redistribution, and that church and state should be kept separate; from another point of view Anne Hutchinson came out with her theses that anyone could achieve salvation and she examined the roles of women in the society. These two posed a threat to the Puritan community, and thus were eliminated.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anne Hutchinson was well known for being an intelligent and powerful religious leader. However, her intellectual abilities in the colonies brought her many challenges and even caused her banishment from Massachusetts Bay. The article analysis the different ways Hutchinson was viewed. She was viewed as a victim of Puritan injustice, a threat to government, and a rebel.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authors thesis of the article is that Anne Hutchinson posed a threat to the power and authority of the Puritan leadership of New England because she is a woman and popular preacher, but mostly because of her religious beliefs: that the ministers were preaching to much about works instead of God’s gift of grace and that she, along with anyone, could communicate directly with God. Anne Hutchinson preached that every person had the capability to communicate with God. This posed a threat to the clerical hierarchy in Massachusetts which had based its power and authority on its role as the middleman between the congregation and God. The Governor John Winthrop did not like Hutchinson’s influence on the people. He sot to destroy her, “Winthrop saw his chance to block Anne's growing influence.”(pg 5). Winthrop supremacy was at jeopardy with another person having such effect on the people of Boston. Her impact could lead to disorder in Massachusetts Puritan society. Hutchinson also proclaim that she could hear god, "By the voice of His own spirit to my soul."(pg 7). This statement got her exiled to Rhode Island. The idea that anyone could speak with god, especially with women, was associated with “witchcraft”(pg 4). Hutchinson’s proclamation threatened the religious theory of Puritan New England and endangered the authority of the clergy, who had gain their power over its people as the “communicators of God”. If people could speak to God themselves they wouldn’t need the clergy anymore and the power and importance of the clergy would be diminished.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Puritan Culture

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    They had this idea of chosen country, which was given a providential mission and in order to fulfill this mission the community had remain faithful to this call by following the rules. I believe they had a great vision of great Christian civilization, but at the same time I believe this strong force fail, because they entered the fanaticism of religion. And of course, when something is imposed on people it starts to generate rebellion to express discontent. William Penn believed in “freedom of conscience to all who believed in God.” He offered a different perspective of what it meant to be a follower of God; he hoped for a peaceful and loving friendship with the Indians. In any case, it is very clear the impact the Puritans had in defining a good American Christian civilization, focused in a vision of a unique country, with a special…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    individualism is “a social theory favoring freedom of action for individuals over collective or state control”. what this means is that the individual has control over what goes on in the society rather than a government or any one force controlling what the individual does, individualism could be shown in many different forms. examples of different forms individualism could be shown is through the way you dress, your moral beliefs, or even your actions.Individualism is shown through romantic, revolutionary, and colonial text in Sinners in the hands of an angry god, speech to Virginia conviction, and self reliance…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because Bradbury illustrates such a humane individual in a pleasant view against his society and putting it in such a cold, harsh light it shows that he is a supporter of individualism. This cheerful character is…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Puritans strongly worshipped God and a structured way of life. They relied on making things themselves, for example making their own clothing and materials, practiced male supremacy, and cherished education. This was an important time in the development of our country as life expectancy went up, education strengthened and religion kept progressing. The literature displaying puritanism can range from sermons, poems and written pieces. US history.org claims “Church attendance was mandatory. Those that missed church regularly were subject to a fine. The sermon became a means of addressing town problems or concerns.” This quote shows how important church was to the puritans and how it helped paint a structured culture. Puritanism is a very crucial belief that paved our country’s future and diversity. Native Americans and puritans at this time created contrast and both were widely present, which brings me to my next point, rationalism in the colonial…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democratic egalitarianism and individualism and how hypocritical society is in regards to the two are the subject matter of this essay. Various notable philosophers and authors have dissected these terms and their meanings relative to human life and society many times in the past. It is obvious to most how democratic egalitarianism and individualism can contradictory in many ways. The complexity of the two is not readily abundant due to examining the values of an American society. In society, these values do not hold up to the true meanings of democratic egalitarianism and individualism.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of one for all, or all for one. Total monarchy or equal shares. Undeniable control or democracy. The ideas of Individualism and Communitarianism clearly contrast each other, but who's to say which belief is the right or wrong way? Is it the rights of many or the privileges of few that is meant to be held higher than the other? This essay will contain the beliefs of Utilitarianism and Individualism, and the similarities and differences that both of these beliefs hold in common.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays