Preview

Jefferson and Hamilton: Friendship and Conflict among the Founding Fathers

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
701 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jefferson and Hamilton: Friendship and Conflict among the Founding Fathers
Patriots Pen Draft One If you were to paint a portrait of the Founding Father 's from the average American 's mind, the final result would depict a group of heroic men marching into battle, defeating the dastardly British, and writing the Constitution all in one sitting. Everything would be tinted with rosy hues of red, white, and blue, and patriotic music sounds in the background…right? Wrong. In 1789, a passionate disagreement broke out between Jefferson and Hamilton over the French Revolution. Jefferson and his Republican supporters were in favor of joining the revolutionaries, while Hamilton and the Federalists called for a neutral stance in relation to the fighting. This lead to the bisection of a previously cooperative government into two warring parties. In 1804, Hamilton, who had a disagreement with Jefferson 's vice-president Aaron Burr, agreed to a duel in the outskirts of Weehawken, New Jersey. While Hamilton had reservations about actually firing, Burr did not. He drew his gun and promptly shot Hamilton in the abdomen. Hamilton died the next day. In 1808, the Founding Fathers supposedly ended the slave trade by passing legislation eradicating slavery in all the states north of the Potomac and prohibiting the expansion of slavery into the Northwest Territory. However, they turned a blind eye to the states south of the Potomac, where nine-tenths of the slaves resided. The bloody Civil War ultimately resulted, leading to the deaths of at least 618,000 young American men. There is endless evidence to be heaped upon the growing pile of failures. Of 21 Founding Fathers studied, 14 had owned slaves. This slaveholders included people such as Benjamin Franklin, Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington. Besides Hamilton, two other Founding Fathers were killed in duels. Countless petty arguments resulted in wide fissures of disagreement. In light of all this, what would I say? Thank you. The Founding Fathers were not perfect


Cited: "Casualties In The Civil War." Casualties In The Civil War. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "Did the Founding Fathers Screw Up?" The American Prospect. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "Essay Contest 2007-2008 - Hamilton vs. Jefferson: Whose Economic Vision Was Better? | The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis." Essay Contest 2007-2008 - Hamilton vs. Jefferson: Whose Economic Vision Was Better? | The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "The Founding Fathers and Slavery (Founding Fathers)." Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "The Founding Fathers Fallacy." Penn Political Review. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "Friendship and Conflict: The Relationship of the U.S. "Founding Fathers"" Student Pulse. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . " ." Our Founding Fathers Sacrificed for the United States of America. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "Political Battles." Political Battles. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. .
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Roger Jefferson Character Analysis
    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Roger Jefferson Character Analysis

    Which made their rivalry even more intense. Hamilton was an intense Federalist in favor of a very powerful federal government. Madison was a Democratic-Republican, so he was in favor of states rights. Burr was a little different, he mostly cared about how to gain power and once joined the other party to improve his chances of becoming president he stayed with Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans for most of his political career. The first rift between Hamilton and Jefferson started when they were selected to serve as cabinet members, Hamilton as Treasury secretary and Jefferson as Secretary of State. Since they had such wildly different viewpoints they often fought. Hamilton, a very egotistical person, sometimes even called a narcissist, attacked Jefferson’s character to demean him during cabinet meetings. Burr and Hamilton were both very well known public figures who were even friends until Burr ran for a Senate seat and beat out Hamilton's father in law. In the article Mr. Kennedy explains how he believes this wasn't a direct act of aggression to Hamilton, as some historians believe, showing just one claim of bias in this analysis. Burr and Jefferson's conflict started in the election of 1800. To make it brief, The voting process was different back then. Jefferson and Burr tied for the most votes and instead of stepping aside for Jefferson, Burr made an attempt at the Presidency. And in order to break the tie, Hamilton endorsed Jefferson, which made electors swing their vote to Jefferson, breaking the tie. This was just one reason Burr challenged Hamilton to duel. Hamilton saw Jefferson as the lesser of two evils, even going as far as saying Burr was a “mischievous enemy.” The 18th century equivalent of calling someone a liar and a fraud on television today. These three men disliked each other a great deal and showed it to the press, and to one…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Founding Brothers Summary
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Founding Brothers Summary

    “The Founding Brothers,” by Joseph J. Ellis, described many great conflicting events throughout the American Revolution and assessed other certain events in the decade following the Constitutional Convention in 1787. These conflicting events profoundly impacted the early development of the United States. Some of these events include ADD EVENTS.Significant figures such as John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, Aaron Burr, and Alexander Hamilton played huge roles in this book. As well as the idea of colonial independence from great revolutionaries stating that the separation was not only possible but also fated in the fact that it was bound to happen some point throughout history.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between The Founding Fathers And Great Britain
    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Similarities Between The Founding Fathers And Great Britain

    "Associate with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to be alone than in bad company" (George Washington). America wouldn't be what it is today if the Founding Fathers didn't feel the same as George Washington did. Britain was bad company and the Founding Fathers felt that America was better off alone, and as its own country. The Founding Fathers were completely just in the way that they separated themselves from Britain, and had every reason to do so.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Best Vision Of The Future: Jefferson Vs. Hamilton
    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Best Vision Of The Future: Jefferson Vs. Hamilton

    However Jefferson had supported the average man unlike Hamilton who excluded the poor in his plans for the government and economy. Another example would be that Hamilton’s plan could become corrupted from the chosen few to become greedy and lead into tyranny. Jefferson had instead believed in divided power and in a weaker central government as he feared for a strong central government to take away liberty. The people participating in the federal government could be tempted to serve themselves rather than the people. Jefferson believed in the common people, calling them the “chosen people of God” (8). However Hamilton trusted only the rich and educated to partake in the government which would result with where the “poor would become poorer”…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson vs. Alexander Hamilton
    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Jefferson vs. Alexander Hamilton

    Although Jefferson often showed a strong dislike for the Federalist laws and programs, when he took office he left many of the Federalist programs intact, and except for revoking the excise tax, the Hamiltonian system was mostly left as it was. However, this act of Jefferson’s went against many of the political beliefs held by his party and himself. Jefferson and Hamilton’s philosophies differed greatly in that Jefferson adhered to a weak central government, with most of the power in the hands of the states. He believed that the federal government’s power should be restrained and limited, so that it would not be able to become tyrannical or try and undermine the power of the states and the people.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Founding Fathers: The Revolutionary Generation
    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Founding Fathers: The Revolutionary Generation

    The book Founding Fathers: The Revolutionary Generation by Joseph J. Ellis demonstrated or portrayed the overview of the early American years to the post-revolutionary era. To emphasize, the book Founding Fathers mainly focuses on the main or background perspective of our true founding fathers. To add, the author Joseph J. Ellis does a great job pointing out the information that was never read or anyone knew about. The author shows the problems that our founding fathers faced and the way they are portrayed in our modern texts or readings.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hofstader Analysis
    • 688 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hofstader Analysis

    In The American Political Tradition by Richard Hofstadter, the article, “Founding Fathers: An Age of Reason,” talks about the founding fathers’ views of the American people. From what is printed in textbooks, people give the founding fathers too much esteem, when they really held none for the people. Hofstadter makes the point that the founding fathers had a very negative view of the common American citizen.…

    • 688 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Founding Fathers Book Review
    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Founding Fathers Book Review

    Does the term “Founding Fathers” ring a bell? Warren G. Harding was the first man on record to refer to the first statesmen of America as the “Founding Fathers;” over fifty years after the last American Revolutionary soldier had died (Bernstein pg. 4). How interesting that this common term that we associate George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, just to name a few, was not such a common term. R.B. Bernstein’s The Founding Fathers Reconsidered, gives us a different view of what we associate “Founding Fathers” to be. All of the founders showed an outstanding ability to adapt not only to unstable environments during the birth of a nation, but to their political environment as well. The author's primary argument was in fact that all the "Fathers" did not get along and share the same views.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Founding Fathers: The Founding Brothers
    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page

    Founding Fathers: The Founding Brothers

    The Founding Brothers reveal Ellis disagreement with contemporary historians on the role of politics in the shaping of the United States. Unlike many other people, Ellis regards the successes of the founding member of the United States as “god written destiny” rather than the struggle of the American Revolution. Unlike many other revolutions of its kind, the American Revolution was able to hold its infant nation together with little bloodshed despite failure of the Article of the Confederation and division of ideology within its founding member. These divisions would, however, ultimately end with the American Civil War. The founding of the United States and the very ideology behind it would continually be raised up to question when one began…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why The Founding Fathers Were Important To A Successful America?
    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why The Founding Fathers Were Important To A Successful America?

    "The Founding Fathers and Slavery (Founding Fathers)." Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 6 Jan. 2014. .…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Battle of Valley Forge
    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Battle of Valley Forge

    Raphael, Ray. Founding myths: stories that hide our patriotic past. New York: New Press :, 2004.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Benjamin Franklin
    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Benjamin Franklin

    Mapp, Alf J.. The faiths of our fathers: what America 's founders really believed. Lanham, Md.:…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Economic Interpretation Of The Constitution Charles Beard Analysis
    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page

    Economic Interpretation Of The Constitution Charles Beard Analysis

    Charles Beard was a historian and political scientist who wrote the book “An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution.” Beard argued that “to understand the Constitution we must understand the economic interests of the national elite, which included the writers of the Constitution.” (144). In this essay, I will discuss Charles Beard and his assertion about the Founding Fathers and the Constitution.…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Brother Jonsathon Analysis
    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Brother Jonsathon Analysis

    The founders had faults and the skills of each member were dramatically overstated and overdone. Washington was not a perfect person nor was he the greatest general, yet he is according to the writers the perfect human. Many leaders owned slaves but not viewed at the time of the Brothers Jonathon to be a very important detail worth relating, this being due to the attitudes of racism present in the writer’s selves. It is important to note that the writers, editors and illustrators represented the higher class white point of view. Just as the Founding Father would have. Not giving women, native Americans, blacks, and poor the right to vote was a conscious choice of theirs. Americans from every walk of life would have and still do view the founding fathers as gods, and all those who opposed them as devil. The black and white nature of this reasoning contributes to the effect overall. Causing an us versus them mentality and adding to the already present nationalism in the United States. This has been occurring since the inception. A process now addressed in present day and met with much resistance. A process that brings about more divide and more hate. The nationalism that was propagated in the 19th century is and may always will be a part of the United States, but historical analysis offers a look into the causes and truth of the past. Only then will the truth of the present be open to…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Founding Brothers
    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Founding Brothers

    In Joseph Ellis’s book, Founding Brothers, Ellis takes an extensive look at how the Founding Fathers established the American republic and how six instances demonstrate the most prominent issues that faced the new fragile nation. He poses the question, “How, then, did they do it?” [16] Ellis answers his question with four common themes that put all six events in relation to each other. The first one was that “the achievement of the revolutionary generation was a collective enterprise that succeeded because of the diversity of personalities and ideologies present in the mix.” [17] Second, all the politicians knew one another. Politics were face-to-face and the political leaders met with each other personally. [17] Third they took slavery, the most threatening issue off the agenda. [17] The fourth and final theme was that the politicians knew they were making history on which their reputation would rest. Knowing that people were watching them kept them on their best behavior. [18] Ellis ties his points together in a way that helps illustrate logic among the scattered principles that the Founding Brothers established for this young nation.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics